令人讨厌的DHTML文字效果 [英] Obnoxious DHTML Text Effects
问题描述
自早期的
javascript以来，已经有了花哨的dhtml文字效果。彩虹文字效果是早期的效果之一。虽然
一些这样的效果可能在私人网页上很有趣，但它们很容易变得令人讨厌，尤其是在商业网站上。在很大程度上，dhtml
文字效果已经被flash所取代，可能因为闪光灯
效果往往对很多人来说更容易制作。
dhtml文本效果有多糟糕？你们中的许多人可能都知道一个
会让你感到烦恼，而且听到你们的b $ b讨厌名单上的一些内容会很有趣。我的效果和我能做的一样令人讨厌。您可以在 http：// www上看到它。
.cwdjr.net / text / DrunkHarlequinText.html 。你知道这个效果比这更糟吗？
There have been fancy dhtml text effects since the early days of
javascript. The rainbow text effect was one of the early ones. While
some such effects may be fun on private pages, they can easily become
obnoxious, especially on commercial sites. To a large extent, dhtml
text effects have been replaced by flash, likely because the flash
effects often are more easy to make for many people.
How bad can a dhtml text effect be? Many of you likely know of one that
irritates you, and it would be interesting to hear about some on your
hate list. I made an effect that is as obnoxious as I could make. You
can see it at http://www.cwdjr.net/text/DrunkHarlequinText.html . Do
you know of a worse effect than this?
推荐答案
cwdjrxyz上面说的以下1 / 17/2006 4:55 PM：
cwdjrxyz said the following on 1/17/2006 4:55 PM:
你知道效果比这更糟吗？
Do you know of a worse effect than this?
是的。
-
兰迪
comp.lang.javascript常见问题 - http://jibbering.com/faq &新闻组每周
Javascript最佳实践 - http：//www.JavascriptToolbox .com / bestpractices /
Yes.
--
Randy
comp.lang.javascript FAQ - http://jibbering.com/faq & newsgroup weekly
Javascript Best Practices - http://www.JavascriptToolbox.com/bestpractices/
Randy Webb写道：
Randy Webb wrote:
cwdjrxyz在1上说下面的内容/ 17/2006 4:55 PM：
cwdjrxyz said the following on 1/17/2006 4:55 PM:
你知道效果比这更糟吗？
Do you know of a worse effect than this?
是的。
Yes.
请不要逗我们兰迪:-)。描述或发布效果，如果你可以
，如果它没有太大的争议。我必须说我看过几部很多b / b
的闪光电影远远超过我用dhtml所做的任何事情。
Please don''t tease us Randy :-). Describe or post the effect if you can
and if it is not too controversial. I must say that I have seen several
flash movies that far exceed anything that I have seen done with dhtml.
cwdjrxyz写道：
cwdjrxyz wrote:
Randy Webb写道：
Randy Webb wrote:
cwdjrxyz在2006年1月17日下午4:55发表以下内容：
cwdjrxyz said the following on 1/17/2006 4:55 PM:
你知道吗？效果比这更差？
是的。
Do you know of a worse effect than this?
Yes.
请不要逗我们兰迪： - ）。
Please don''t tease us Randy :-).
你不应该把自己与一些''我们'混淆（精神分裂症不是b
）。兰迪不会取笑我，因为我不在乎。
如果可以，如果它不是太有争议，请描述或发布效果。我必须说我看过几部很多的flash电影远远超过了我用dhtml所做的任何事情。
You shouldn''t confuse yourself with some ''us'' (schizophrenia not
withstanding). Randy isn''t teasing me, because I could not care less.
Describe or post the effect if you can and if it is not
too controversial. I must say that I have seen several
flash movies that far exceed anything that I have seen done
with dhtml.
有什么意义？毫无疑问，事情可以（并且有时候是b $ b）完成得非常糟糕，但是对于一个坏事最坏的例子来说，一个任务的重点是什么？
Richard。
What is the point? There is no question that things can be (and
sometimes are) done incredibly badly, but what is the point of a quest
for the worst example of a bad thing?
Richard.
这篇关于令人讨厌的DHTML文字效果的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
