我即将发布下一个postgresql RFD。想要评论。 [英] I'm about to release the next postgresql RFD. Comments wanted.

查看:93
本文介绍了我即将发布下一个postgresql RFD。想要评论。的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

显然,comp。*层次结构中不能有21个postgresql组。

21个中的许多都不经常使用,并且不太受欢迎

给那些关于usenet的人。


我检查了news.postgresql.org,看看哪些新闻组最受欢迎,另外还有哪些新闻组受欢迎相关的postgresql主题。在这四个

新闻组中代表了大多数
的postgresql主题和流量:


comp.databases.postgresql.admin < br $> b $ b comp.databases.postgresql.general

comp.databases.postgresql.hackers

comp.databases.postgresql.sql


这些是下一版RFD中的四个新闻组。

新闻组将被取消调制,但海报将被审核

在网关方面,订阅者将会看到他们的帖子

将其用于usenet和邮件列表。


考虑这一点的好方法是订阅是通过审核获得

的快捷方式。您可以选择不收到任何电子邮件。


对于那些不熟悉postgresql的news.groups,请加入

news.postgresql.org并查看组列表。您将看到制作

这四个群体中的8个正确成员将解决大部分

usenet问题,因为其他群体没有几乎相同的数量

流量。

Obviously, there cannot be 21 postgresql groups in the comp.* hierarchy.
Many of the 21 are not used that often, and would not be of much popularity
to those on usenet.

I did a check on news.postgresql.org to see which newsgroups are the most
popular and also the ones which cover the relevant postgresql topics. Most
of the postgresql topics and traffic are represented in these four
newsgroups:

comp.databases.postgresql.admin
comp.databases.postgresql.general
comp.databases.postgresql.hackers
comp.databases.postgresql.sql

These are the four newsgroups that will be in the next version of the RFD.
The newsgroups will be unmoderated, although the posters will be moderated
at the gateway side, with those who are subscribed will see their posts
make it to usenet and the mailing list.

A good way to think of this is that the subscription is a fast way to get
through moderation. You have the option of not getting any emails.

For those on the news.groups who are not familiar with postgresql, join
news.postgresql.org and see the groups list. You will see that making
these four groups proper members of the big 8 would solve most of the
usenet problems since the other groups do not have nearly the same amount
of traffic.

推荐答案

新提案应包含所有列表。令我惊讶的是,一个未知的闯入者试图决定哪些列表应该被投票。

我是一个由超过60个PostgreSql用户/开发者组成的网络,

我将通过电子邮件向每个人发送一张选票。如果您的下一个

提案不包含每一个列表,您可以预期

基本上所有这60个人都不会投票。如果你遗漏了一个

列表,我会激烈地反对你的提议。如果你真诚地想帮助这个名单做正确的事情

订阅者。


这是我发给news.groups的最后一篇文章。

The new proposal should have all of the lists. I am amazed that an
unknown interloper is trying to dictate which lists should be voted on.
I am affiliated with a network of over 60 PostgreSql users/developers,
and I will e-mail each one of those people a ballot. If your next
proposal does not contain every single one of the lists, you can expect
essentially all of those 60 people to vote no. I will campaign
passionately against your proposal if you leave out even one of the
lists. Do the right thing if you are sincerely trying to help the list
subscribers.

This is my last post to news.groups about this.




作为附注...如果/当CFV被调用时,那4个是

批准/拒绝,这将不会改变

news.postgresql.org上的内容,它只会改善那些特定群组的传播,以便更多的服务器世界带着它们......


2004年11月9日星期二,Mike Cox写道:

As a side note ... if/when the CFV is called and those 4 are
approved/rejected, that will not change what is available on
news.postgresql.org, it will only improve the propogation of those 4
specific groups so that more servers around the world carry them ...

On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, Mike Cox wrote:
显然,不能有21个postgresql组在comp。*层次结构中。
21个中的许多都不经常使用,并且对于那些使用网络的人来说不会太受欢迎。

我做了检查news.postgresql.org查看哪些新闻组最受欢迎,以及哪些新闻组涵盖了相关的postgresql主题。大多数postgresql主题和流量都在这四个新闻组中有所体现:

comp.databases.postgresql.admin
comp.databases.postgresql.general
comp.databases.postgresql.hackers
comp.databases.postgresql.sql

以下是将在下一版RFD中的四个新闻组。
新闻组虽然海报将在网关方面进行审核,但是订阅的人会看到他们的帖子
使其成为usenet和邮件列表。

A想到这一点的好方法是订阅是通过审核获得
的快捷方式。您可以选择不收到任何电子邮件。

对于那些不熟悉postgresql的新闻组,请加入
news.postgresql.org并查看组列表。您将看到,制作这四个组的正确成员将解决大多数的usenet问题,因为其他组没有几乎相同的流量。
---------------------------(播出结束)------------- --------------
提示7:别忘了增加免费空间地图设置
Obviously, there cannot be 21 postgresql groups in the comp.* hierarchy.
Many of the 21 are not used that often, and would not be of much popularity
to those on usenet.

I did a check on news.postgresql.org to see which newsgroups are the most
popular and also the ones which cover the relevant postgresql topics. Most
of the postgresql topics and traffic are represented in these four
newsgroups:

comp.databases.postgresql.admin
comp.databases.postgresql.general
comp.databases.postgresql.hackers
comp.databases.postgresql.sql

These are the four newsgroups that will be in the next version of the RFD.
The newsgroups will be unmoderated, although the posters will be moderated
at the gateway side, with those who are subscribed will see their posts
make it to usenet and the mailing list.

A good way to think of this is that the subscription is a fast way to get
through moderation. You have the option of not getting any emails.

For those on the news.groups who are not familiar with postgresql, join
news.postgresql.org and see the groups list. You will see that making
these four groups proper members of the big 8 would solve most of the
usenet problems since the other groups do not have nearly the same amount
of traffic.

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: don''t forget to increase your free space map settings




- ---

Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org网络服务( http:/ /www.hub.org

电子邮件: sc*****@hub.org Yahoo!:yscrappy ICQ:7615664


--------------------------- (播出结束)---------------------------

提示4:不要杀人-9''邮政局长



----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: sc*****@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don''t ''kill -9'' the postmaster


新提案应该包含所有列表。令我惊讶的是,一个未知的闯入者试图决定哪些列表应该被投票。

我是一个由超过60个PostgreSql用户/开发者组成的网络,

我将通过电子邮件向每个人发送一张选票。如果您的下一个

提案不包含每一个列表,您可以预期

基本上所有这60个人都不会投票。如果你遗漏了一个

列表,我会激烈地反对你的提议。如果你真诚地想帮助这个名单做正确的事情

订阅者。


这是我发给news.groups的最后一篇文章。

The new proposal should have all of the lists. I am amazed that an
unknown interloper is trying to dictate which lists should be voted on.
I am affiliated with a network of over 60 PostgreSql users/developers,
and I will e-mail each one of those people a ballot. If your next
proposal does not contain every single one of the lists, you can expect
essentially all of those 60 people to vote no. I will campaign
passionately against your proposal if you leave out even one of the
lists. Do the right thing if you are sincerely trying to help the list
subscribers.

This is my last post to news.groups about this.


这篇关于我即将发布下一个postgresql RFD。想要评论。的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆