Windows 2000 Server和Acess 2000不断损坏 [英] Windows 2000 Server and Acess 2000 constant corruption
问题描述
我工作的公司已经在Windows NT
服务器上运行Access 2000，在服务器上关闭机会锁定功能，而且没有
问题近一年。我们刚刚切换到安装了Service Pack 3的Windows 2000文件
服务器，现在每天至少损失
2个损坏。 Windows 2000服务器上的机会锁定
的注册表设置在Windows 2000
我理解的服务包3应该照顾这个
问题。有没有人对如何进行任何建议？任何帮助
将不胜感激，因为这导致了非常不稳定的工作
环境。
问候，
马克C.
The company I work for has been running Access 2000 on a Windows NT
server with Opportunistic Locking turned off on the server without
issue for almost a year. We have just switched to a Windows 2000 file
server with service pack 3 installed and are now experiencing at least
2 corruptions a day. The registry setting for Opportunistic Locking
that was on the Windows NT server does not exist on the Windows 2000
server so we can not make the needed change to the new server. From
what I understand service pack 3 is supposed to take care of this
problem. Does anyone have any suggestions on how to procced? Any help
would be appreciated as this has caused a very unstable work
environment.
Regards,
Mark C.
推荐答案
他****** @ yahoo.com （Mark C.）写道：
he******@yahoo.com (Mark C.) wrote:
我工作的公司一直在Windows NT
服务器上运行Access 2000，机会锁定已转在服务器上关闭了近一年没有问题。我们刚刚切换到安装了Service Pack 3的Windows 2000文件服务器，现在每天至少会遇到2次损坏。 Windows 2000服务器上的机会锁定的注册表设置在Windows 2000服务器上不存在，因此我们无法对新服务器进行必要的更改。
根据知识库文章添加注册表设置在
Windows中配置机会锁定 http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=296264 并重新启动。
来自
我知道Service Pack 3应该解决这个问题。
The company I work for has been running Access 2000 on a Windows NT
server with Opportunistic Locking turned off on the server without
issue for almost a year. We have just switched to a Windows 2000 file
server with service pack 3 installed and are now experiencing at least
2 corruptions a day. The registry setting for Opportunistic Locking
that was on the Windows NT server does not exist on the Windows 2000
server so we can not make the needed change to the new server.
Add the registry setting as per the KB article Configuring Opportunistic Locking in
Windows http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=296264 and reboot.
From
what I understand service pack 3 is supposed to take care of this
problem.
但是Win 2000 SP3也必须安装在所有客户端系统上。
Tony
-
Tony Toews，Microsoft Access MVP
请仅回复新闻组，以便其他人可以阅读整个消息线程。
Microsoft Access Links，Hints，Tips&会计系统
http://www.granite.ab.ca /accsmstr.htm
Tony，
感谢您的帮助，但您提到的更改没有帮助。
注册表设置已在服务器端添加，所有客户端
机器已经有服务包3.我们总共有5个腐败'今天
在两个不同的数据库中。
我们有一个代表。今天来自微软的电话，他认为这不是问题所在的Ops Locks。他告诉我们，我们使用的MSJET DLL是旧的，但这是我们在Win NT服务器中使用的相同的DLL
环境，没有腐败。今天晚上我们使用
DLL进行了更改，只需要祈祷它有效。微软告诉我们首先尝试这个
，如果它无法回复它们。你认为他们知道他们在谈论什么？b $ b？如果有人对此类问题有任何见解
请务必帮助我们。我想如果所有其他方法都失败了我们可以回到
Win NT服务器我们没有腐败但最终我们必须
升级。
问候，
Mark
" Tony Toews" < TT **** @ telusplanet.net>在消息中写道
news：44 ******************************** @ 4ax.com ...
Tony,
Thanks for your help but the changes you mentioned did not help.
The registry setting was added on the server side and all the client
machines already have service pack 3. We had a total of 5 corruption''s today
in 2 different databases.
We had a rep. from Microsoft on the phone today and he thinks that it is not
Ops Locks that is the problem. He told us that the MSJET DLL that we are
using is old but this is the same DLL we used in the Win NT server
environment with no corruption''s. We made the change this evening with the
DLL and just have to pray that it works. Microsoft told us to try this
first and if it does not work to call them back. Do you think they know what
they are talking about? If anyone has any insight to this type of problem
please by all means help us out. I guess if all else fails we can go back to
the Win NT server were we had no corruption''s but eventually we have to
upgrade.
Regards,
Mark
"Tony Toews" <tt****@telusplanet.net> wrote in message
news:44********************************@4ax.com...
he******@yahoo.com （Mark C. ）写道：
he******@yahoo.com (Mark C.) wrote:
我工作的公司一直在Windows NT
服务器上运行Access 2000，机器人锁定在服务器上关闭，几乎没有
问题一年。我们刚刚切换到安装了Service Pack 3的Windows 2000文件服务器，现在每天至少会遇到2次损坏。 Windows 2000服务器上的机会锁定的注册表设置在Windows 2000服务器上不存在，因此我们无法对新服务器进行必要的更改。
添加注册表设置根据知识库文章配置机会
The company I work for has been running Access 2000 on a Windows NT
server with Opportunistic Locking turned off on the server without
issue for almost a year. We have just switched to a Windows 2000 file
server with service pack 3 installed and are now experiencing at least
2 corruptions a day. The registry setting for Opportunistic Locking
that was on the Windows NT server does not exist on the Windows 2000
server so we can not make the needed change to the new server.
Add the registry setting as per the KB article Configuring Opportunistic
在Windows中锁定 http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=296264 并重新启动。
Locking in Windows http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=296264 and reboot.
从
我理解的服务包3应该是处理这个
问题。
From
what I understand service pack 3 is supposed to take care of this
problem.
但是Win 2000 SP3也必须安装在所有客户端系统上。
Tony
-
Tony Toews，Microsoft Access MVP
请仅在新闻组中回复，以便其他人可以阅读整个消息主题。
Microsoft Access Links，Hints，Tips& ;会计系统
http://www.granite.ab.ca /accsmstr.htm
他** ****@yahoo.com （马克）写在
< ZO ******************** @ comcast .com>：
he******@yahoo.com (Mark) wrote in
<ZO********************@comcast.com>:
服务器端添加了注册表设置，所有
客户端机器已经有了service pack 3.我们共有5个
腐败现在在2个不同的数据库中。
我们有一个代表。今天来自微软的电话，他认为这不是Ops Locks的问题。他告诉我们，我们使用的MSJET
DLL已经过时了，但这与我们在Win NT服务器环境中使用的没有损坏的DLL相同。我们今晚用DLL修改了
，只需祈祷它就可以了。微软告诉我们首先尝试这个，如果它不起作用
给他们回电话。你觉得他们知道他们在说什么吗？如果有人对此类问题有任何见解，请通过
一切手段帮助我们。我想如果其他所有方法都失败了，我们可以回到Win NT服务器，如果我们没有腐败，但最终我们必须升级。
The registry setting was added on the server side and all the
client machines already have service pack 3. We had a total of 5
corruption''s today in 2 different databases.
We had a rep. from Microsoft on the phone today and he thinks that
it is not Ops Locks that is the problem. He told us that the MSJET
DLL that we are using is old but this is the same DLL we used in
the Win NT server environment with no corruption''s. We made the
change this evening with the DLL and just have to pray that it
works. Microsoft told us to try this first and if it does not work
to call them back. Do you think they know what they are talking
about? If anyone has any insight to this type of problem please by
all means help us out. I guess if all else fails we can go back to
the Win NT server were we had no corruption''s but eventually we
have to upgrade.
Access安装至少是SR1a +并且至少是Jet
4 Service Pack 6？如果没有，你将继续遭受腐败。
一旦你在100％的工作站中实现了这一点（即使是一个工作站中的一个，b $ 100的b $ b将导致腐败），您可以开始查看其他问题的来源。
我已经完成了几十次 - SR1a或更高版本加上Jet 4
SP6是Access 2000的最低安全安装。任何更少的
最终都会导致腐败。
并且不要''猜猜 - 检查每个工作站。在我的
最大的安装（大约40个工作站）我输入代码
日志访问版本和Jet版本在中央表格中
用户登录，这样我就可以随时查看谁在运行什么版本的
Access（是的，工作站还原时由
技术人员重建而不知道他们需要做什么才能完全重新安装
Access）。
-
David W. Fenton http://www.bway.net/~dfenton
bway dot net的dfenton http://www.bway.net/~dfassoc
Are the Access installations at least SR1a+ and at least Jet
4 Service Pack 6? If not, you''ll continue to experience corruption.
Once you have that in place in 100% of workstations (even one out
of 100 will cause corruption), the you can start looking at other
sources of problems.
I''ve been through this dozens of times -- SR1a or later plus Jet 4
SP6 is the minimum safe installation of Access 2000. Anything less
is going to cause corruption eventually.
And don''t just guess -- check every single workstation. At my
largest installation (about 40 workstations) I put in code that
logs Access version and Jet version in a central table when the
users log in so I can always check who is running what version of
Access (and, yes, workstations revert when they are rebuilt by
techs who don''t know what they need to do to fully re-install
Access).
--
David W. Fenton http://www.bway.net/~dfenton
dfenton at bway dot net http://www.bway.net/~dfassoc
这篇关于Windows 2000 Server和Acess 2000不断损坏的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
