管理代码易于反向设计？ [英] How easy managed codes be reversed engineered?
问题描述
我是.net和掌上电脑开发的新手。
我的背景纯粹是C / C ++ / VC ++ 。已经在Mobile Java上开发了一年，并且感觉完全没有安全感，因为所有代码都可以轻松地实现
未编译。
And这就是我为智能手机和PocketPC设备试用.net的原因。
我只是好奇.net托管代码可以被反向设计？
和Java一样简单吗？或者像二进制C一样难吗？
感谢阅读。
Hi,
I am really new in .net and pocket PC development.
My background are purely C/C++/VC++. Have developed on Mobile Java for a
year and felt completely insecure with it because all codes can easily
uncompiled.
And it is why I am trying on .net for smartphone and PocketPC devices.
I am just curious on how easy .net managed codes can be reversed engineered?
As easy as Java? Or as hard as binary C?
Thanks for reading.
推荐答案
2005年7月14日星期四04:28:01 +0800，Canon EOS写道：
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 04:28:01 +0800, Canon EOS wrote:
我是.net和掌上电脑开发的新手。
我的背景纯粹是C / C ++ / VC ++。已经在移动Java上开发了一年，并且觉得它完全不安全，因为所有代码都可以轻松地进行编译。
这就是为什么我正在尝试.net用于智能手机和PocketPC设备。
我只是好奇.net托管代码可以被反向设计？
像Java一样简单吗？或者像二进制C一样难？
Hi,
I am really new in .net and pocket PC development.
My background are purely C/C++/VC++. Have developed on Mobile Java for a
year and felt completely insecure with it because all codes can easily
uncompiled.
And it is why I am trying on .net for smartphone and PocketPC devices.
I am just curious on how easy .net managed codes can be reversed engineered?
As easy as Java? Or as hard as binary C?
和Java一样简单。请参阅Lutz Roeder的免费.NET Reflector：
http ：//www.aisto.com/roeder/dotnet
感谢您的链接。我刚刚下载并尝试了它...
它仍然没那么糟，对吧？我无法查看任何私有内容。
因此.net托管代码比Java更安全，对吧？
任何人？
" Ross Presser" < RP ****** @ NOSPAMgmail.com.invalid>在留言中写道
新闻：1k ***************************** @ 40tude.net ...
Thanks for the links. I just downloaded and try it...
It is still not that bad, right? I cannot view anything that is "private".
So .net managed codes are far safer than Java, right?
Anyone?
"Ross Presser" <rp******@NOSPAMgmail.com.invalid> wrote in message
news:1k*****************************@40tude.net...
On Thu，2005年7月14日04:28:01 +0800，Canon EOS写道：
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 04:28:01 +0800, Canon EOS wrote:
我是在.net和掌上电脑开发方面真的很新。
我的背景纯粹是C / C ++ / VC ++。已经在移动Java上开发了一年，并且觉得它完全不安全，因为所有代码都可以轻松地进行编译。
这就是为什么我正在尝试.net用于智能手机和PocketPC设备。
我只是好奇.net托管代码可以如何轻松设计？
像Java一样简单吗？还是像二进制C一样难？
Hi,
I am really new in .net and pocket PC development.
My background are purely C/C++/VC++. Have developed on Mobile Java for a
year and felt completely insecure with it because all codes can easily
uncompiled.
And it is why I am trying on .net for smartphone and PocketPC devices.
I am just curious on how easy .net managed codes can be reversed
engineered?
As easy as Java? Or as hard as binary C?
就像Java一样简单。请参阅Lutz Roeder的免费.NET Reflector：
http ：//www.aisto.com/roeder/dotnet
Canon EOS< no **** @ nospam.org>写道：
Canon EOS <no****@nospam.org> wrote:
感谢您的链接。我刚刚下载并尝试了......
它仍然不是那么糟糕，对吧？我无法查看任何私人内容。
是的，你可以。你尝试了什么？
所以.net托管代码远比Java安全，对吗？
Thanks for the links. I just downloaded and try it...
It is still not that bad, right? I cannot view anything that is "private".
Yes you can. What did you try?
So .net managed codes are far safer than Java, right?
不，它基本上是和Java一样。
-
Jon Skeet - < sk *** @ pobox.com>
http://www.pobox.com/~skeet
如果回复小组，请不要给我发邮件
No, it''s basically the same as Java.
--
Jon Skeet - <sk***@pobox.com>
http://www.pobox.com/~skeet
If replying to the group, please do not mail me too
这篇关于管理代码易于反向设计？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
