雅各布尼尔森说：改变访问过的链接的颜色 [英] Jakob Nielsen says: Change the color of visited links

问题描述

Jakob Nielsen在他最近的Alertbox中

（ http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20040503.html ）告诉网络作者

更改访问过的链接的颜色。


我同意他的目的：帮助用户了解他们去过的地方。我同意后台：太多的网页作者保持统一的链接

颜色或他们的页面，从而使用户感到困惑。


我很难同意他的结论是网络作者

应该故意改变已经访问过的链接的颜色。


我不记得了看过一个基于GUI的浏览器，默认情况下不会改变访问链接的颜色（或至少是外观）。在

我正在使用的浏览器（IE6，Moz1.4，Opera7.2），访问链接的颜色/外观甚至可以由用户控制。


所以我的问题是：为什么我作为网络作者控制

访问过的链接的颜色，当大多数浏览器默认情况下这样做时以及用户在

大多数情况下都可以设置自己的喜好吗？


-

Jan Tuxen

删除如果您想直接向我发送电子邮件，请在我的地址中找到五三个。

Jakob Nielsen in his most recent Alertbox
(http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20040503.html) tells web authors to
change the color of visited links.

I agree to his purpose: Help users understand where they have been. I
also agree to the background: Too many web authors keep uniform link
colors or their pages, thereby confusing the users.

What I have a hard time agreeing to is his conclusion that web authors
should deliberately change the color of already visited links.

I do not recall having seen a GUI based browser that does not change
the color (or at least the appearance) of visited links by default. In
the browsers that I am currently using (IE6, Moz1.4, Opera7.2),
color/appearance of visited links can even be controlled by the user.

So my question is: Why should I as a web author control the color of
visited links when most browsers do so by default and when users in
most cases are allowed to set their own preferences?

--
Jan Tuxen
Remove five-three-o-o in my address if you want to
e-mail directly to me.

推荐答案

在星期二，2004年5月4日15:48:16 +0200，Jan Tuxen< ja ******* @ get2net.dk5300>

写道：

On Tue, 04 May 2004 15:48:16 +0200, Jan Tuxen <ja*******@get2net.dk5300>
wrote:

Jakob Nielsen在他最近的Alertbox中
（ http：// www .useit.com / alertbox / 20040503.html ）告诉网络作者
改变访问过的链接的颜色。
...
所以我的问题是：当大多数浏览器默认情况下以及大多数情况下允许用户设置自己的偏好时，为什么我作为网络作者控制访问链接的颜色？

Jakob Nielsen in his most recent Alertbox
(http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20040503.html) tells web authors to
change the color of visited links.
...
So my question is: Why should I as a web author control the color of
visited links when most browsers do so by default and when users in
most cases are allowed to set their own preferences?

你应该提出建议。一个很好的理由是如果你的背景颜色

不能为链接提供足够的对比度。


事实上，我可以覆盖你所做的每一个风格建议。那么为什么

呢？因为它们是建议，*大多数*用户都会使用它们。

You should make suggestions. One good reason is if your background color
would not provide sufficient contrast for the link.

Fact is, I can override every style suggestion you make. So why do
anything? Because they are suggestions, and *most* users will use them.

2004年5月4日星期二15:48:16 + 0200，Jan Tuxen写道：

On Tue, 04 May 2004 15:48:16 +0200, Jan Tuxen wrote:

所以我的问题是：当大多数浏览器默认情况下以及大多数情况下的用户被允许时，为什么我作为网络作者控制访问链接的颜色？设置自己的偏好？

So my question is: Why should I as a web author control the color of
visited links when most browsers do so by default and when users in
most cases are allowed to set their own preferences?

来说明少数。尽可能少留下

机会。


-

Andrew Thompson
http://www.PhySci.org/ 开源软件套件
http://www.PhySci.org/codes/ Web& IT帮助
http://www.1point1C.org/ Science&技术

To account for ''the few''. Leave as little
to chance as is practicable.

--
Andrew Thompson
http://www.PhySci.org/ Open-source software suite
http://www.PhySci.org/codes/ Web & IT Help
http://www.1point1C.org/ Science & Technology

Jan Tuxen写道：

Jan Tuxen wrote:

Jakob Nielsen在他最近的Alertbox中
（ http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20040503.html ）告诉网络作者
改变访问过的链接的颜色。

我同意他的目的：帮助用户了解他们去过的地方。我也同意背景：太多网页作者保持统一的链接颜色或页面，从而使用户感到困惑。

我很难同意的是他的结论是网络作者应该故意改变已经访问过的链接的颜色。


我可能误读了尼尔森，但我不认为他说故意说了什么，除了确保

颜色不同。如果网络作者单独留下颜色

，那么大多数浏览器会在访问过的
和未访问过的链接之间显示颜色差异。


我个人认为Nielsen的意思是说：确保你不要
使访问过的链接颜色等于非访问链接

颜色。

结果确实有意改变

访问链接的颜色如果你改变了任何链接的颜色，我想？

我不记得有看到一个基于GUI的浏览器，默认情况下不会改变访问过的链接的颜色（或至少是外观）。在我目前使用的浏览器（IE6，Moz1.4，Opera7.2）中，访问链接的颜色/外观甚至可以由用户控制。
所以我的问题是：当大多数浏览器默认情况下以及大多数情况下允许用户设置自己的偏好时，为什么我作为网络作者控制访问链接的颜色？ ？

Jakob Nielsen in his most recent Alertbox
(http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20040503.html) tells web authors to
change the color of visited links.

I agree to his purpose: Help users understand where they have been. I
also agree to the background: Too many web authors keep uniform link
colors or their pages, thereby confusing the users.

What I have a hard time agreeing to is his conclusion that web authors
should deliberately change the color of already visited links.
I might have misread Nielsen, but I don''t think he said
anything about deliberately, other than making sure the
colors are different. If web authors would leave the colours
alone, most browsers would show difference in colour between
visited and non-visited links.

Personally I think Nielsen meant to say: make sure you don''t
make the visited link colour equal to the non-visited link
colour.
Which results indeed, in deliberately changing the colour of
visited links if you changed the colour of any links, I suppose?
I do not recall having seen a GUI based browser that does not change
the color (or at least the appearance) of visited links by default. In
the browsers that I am currently using (IE6, Moz1.4, Opera7.2),
color/appearance of visited links can even be controlled by the user. So my question is: Why should I as a web author control the color of
visited links when most browsers do so by default and when users in
most cases are allowed to set their own preferences?

因为作者碰巧改变了

链接的默认颜色，而且大多数用户都懒得设置自己的

首选项？在某些情况下，用户不允许改变浏览器的设置（即在图书馆，

网吧）

>
-

Els
http：// locusmeus .com /

Sonhos vem。 Sonhos v？o。 Orestoébritfeito。

- Renato Russo -

Because authors happen to change the default colors of the
links, and most users don''t bother to set their own
preferences? And in some cases, users aren''t allowed to
change the settings of their browser (i.e. in libraries,
internet-cafes)

--
Els
http://locusmeus.com/
Sonhos vem. Sonhos v?o. O resto é imperfeito.
- Renato Russo -

这篇关于雅各布尼尔森说：改变访问过的链接的颜色的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！