.net对我来说不安全.. ???它得到反编译 [英] .net is not safe for me..??? it get's decompiled

问题描述

我在net varius反编译器上看到过，我试图通过混淆来保护我的代码，但仍然可以反转...如果你检查

for反思反编译器...

i不知道该怎么办。!!!

http://www.aisto.com/roeder/dotnet/

I have seen on the net varius decompilers and i have tried to protect
my code with obfuscation but still it can be reversed... if you check
for Reflection Decompiler...
i don''t know what to do.!!!

http://www.aisto.com/roeder/dotnet/

推荐答案

你没有反编译......它从未被编译过。你永远不必对b $ b反编译任何东西来看看有人做了什么。你只需要让b $ b有一个观察者（比如Reflector）来查看它。您还可以加载一个

程序集（.NET EXE / .NET DLL / Whatever）并使用反射库

查看代码中的任何方法或任何内容。也就是说，你b $ b可以让你自己的Reflector相当简单...


如果你不想为社会做贡献而不是帮助世界，你

保持你的代码私密和安全在你的

工作中使用混淆器。例如，如果您使用Reflector查看Reflector代码，

您将发现它主要是胡言乱语。它被混淆了。

You don''t decompile... it was never compiled. You never have to
decompile anything to see how somebody did something. You just have to
have a viewer (like Reflector) to view it. You can also load an
assembly (.NET EXE/ .NET DLL/Whatever) and use the reflection library
to view any method or whatever you need to in the code. That is, you
can make your own Reflector fairly simply...

If you don''t want to contribute to society and not help the world, you
keep your code "private" and "safe" by using an obfuscator on your
work. For example, if you use Reflector to view the Reflector code,
you will find out that it''s mostly gibberish. It''s obfuscated.

Man ..混淆是一个骗局...... .NET还不安全......

混淆了代码是清晰可辨的...你理解了一个小小的努力...

所有，字符串'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' />
微软的每个人都打到Java，但知道你有同样的问题

但是已经解决了...... .NET不能让我知道......我知道什么是好的

并且不好......而且.NET对于专业人士来说并不安全....是我的真实

意见我会等待一段时间cos什么样的安全.net提议。????

混淆器...... !!!! jummm !!!!

Man.. the obfuscation is a charade.... .NET is not safe still...
obfuscated the code is legible... with a litle effort you understand...
all, the string''s aren''t encrypted nothing convice me, a time ago
everybody at microsoft hit to Java but know you have the same problem
but have solved it... .NET not convice me... cos i know what is good
and is bad... and .NET isn''t safe for professionals.... is my real
opinion i will wait a time cos what kind of security .net offer.????
obfuscator... !!!! jummm!!!!

re：

微软的每个人都打到Java，但知道你有同样的问题


Java应用程序也很容易被分解。

这只是野兽的本质。


无论如何，我认为你可以比Java代码更容易混淆.net代码。


Juan T. Llibre，asp.net MVP

aspnetfaq.com： http://www.aspnetfaq.com/

asp .net faq： http://asp.net.do/faq/

foros de asp.net，en espa？ol： http：/ /asp.net.do/foros/

============================= ======

Ing。 Eduardo F. Sandino < ED ************* @ gmail.com>在消息中写道

新闻：11 ********************* @ e56g2000cwe.googlegro ups.com ...男人..混淆是一个游戏...... .NET还不安全......
混淆了代码清晰......你理解的一点点努力......
所有，字符串''s aren'加密没有任何事情让我有所帮助，前一段时间
微软的每个人都打到了Java，但知道你有同样的问题
但已经解决了...... .NET不能让我知道......我知道是什么很好
而且很糟糕...... .NET对于专业人士来说并不安全....我的真实意见我将等待一段时间以来提供什么样的安全.net提供。 ??混淆器...... !!!! jummm !!!!

everybody at microsoft hit to Java but know you have the same problem
Java apps are easily decompilable, too.
It''s just the nature of the beast.

Regardless, I think you can obfuscate .net code easier than Java code.


Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
aspnetfaq.com : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en espa?ol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
===================================
"Ing. Eduardo F. Sandino" <ed*************@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:11*********************@e56g2000cwe.googlegro ups.com... Man.. the obfuscation is a charade.... .NET is not safe still...
obfuscated the code is legible... with a litle effort you understand...
all, the string''s aren''t encrypted nothing convice me, a time ago
everybody at microsoft hit to Java but know you have the same problem
but have solved it... .NET not convice me... cos i know what is good
and is bad... and .NET isn''t safe for professionals.... is my real
opinion i will wait a time cos what kind of security .net offer.????
obfuscator... !!!! jummm!!!!

这篇关于.net对我来说不安全.. ???它得到反编译的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！