.NET Framework 3.5 [英] .NET Framework 3.5

问题描述

3.5版本的.NET Framework（目前是Beta 2）可以安装在
pre-Vista计算机上吗？或者它只是Vista？


而且，为什么.NET Framework没有预先安装运行的

系统？我认为人们拒绝使用此类软件的主要原因之一是必须首先安装一些东西。我知道它可能需要升级，但

为什么Windows机器没有任何.NET Framework（或者我错了

这个）？

似乎.NET Framework应该附带任何Window OS，并且它应该自动升级ala Windoes更新。似乎过时了要求

最终用户安装除非使用的惰性内容，并且是使用VS编写的所有托管软件的基础！



简单地说，为什么Windows不支持托管代码？

Can the 3.5 version of .NET Framework (currently Beta 2) be installed on
pre-Vista machines? Or is it Vista-only?

And, why doesn''t .NET Framework come pre-installed with the operating
system? I think one of the main reasons people will reject such software is
having to install something first. I understand it might need upgrading, but
why do Windows machines come without any .NET Framework (or am I wrong about
this)?

It seems that .NET Framework should come with any Window OS, and that it
should auto-upgrade ala Windoes Update. It seems antiquated to require the
end-user to install something that is inert unless used, and is the basis of
all managed software written using VS!

Put simply, why isn''t managed code supported by Windows NATIVELY?

推荐答案

>可以在

>Can the 3.5 version of .NET Framework (currently Beta 2) be installed on

> Vista之前的机器上安装3.5版本的.NET Framework（目前是Beta 2）吗？还是仅限Vista？

>pre-Vista machines? Or is it Vista-only?

它适用于XP - 没有尝试过其他任何东西。

It works on XP - haven''t tried anything else.

>以及为什么.NET Framework是否预先安装了操作系统？

>And, why doesn''t .NET Framework come pre-installed with the operating
system?

一些较新的Windows操作系统确实安装了.Net FW版本为

标准。

Some newer Windows OS''s do have a version of the .Net FW installed as
standard.

>我认为人们拒绝此类软件的主要原因之一是必须先安装一些东西。

>I think one of the main reasons people will reject such software is
having to install something first.

事实上这个东西比较大（20 + MB）。

And the fact that the something is relatively big (20+MB).

> why Windows机器没有任何.NET Framework（或者我错了
这个）？

>why do Windows machines come without any .NET Framework (or am I wrong about
this)?

后者。

The latter.

>似乎.NET Framework应附带任何Window OS，并且它应该自动升级ala Windoes更新。

>It seems that .NET Framework should come with any Window OS, and that it
should auto-upgrade ala Windoes Update.

除非我弄错了，我认为这是吴建议的安装。


Dave

Unless I''m mistaken, I think it is a suggested installation via WU.

Dave

" Peter Anthony" < po ******* @ roundtripllc.comwrote in message

news：OU ************** @ TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl ...

"Peter Anthony" <po*******@roundtripllc.comwrote in message
news:OU**************@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

3.5版本的.NET Framework（目前是Beta 2）是否可以安装在
pre-Vista机器上？或者它只是Vista？


而且，为什么.NET Framework没有预先安装运行的

系统？我认为人们拒绝使用这类软件的主要原因之一就是必须首先安装一些东西。我知道它可能需要升级，但是为什么Windows机器没有任何.NET Framework（或者我不知道这是不是我的错误）？

似乎.NET Framework应该附带任何Window操作系统，并且它是

Can the 3.5 version of .NET Framework (currently Beta 2) be installed on
pre-Vista machines? Or is it Vista-only?

And, why doesn''t .NET Framework come pre-installed with the operating
system? I think one of the main reasons people will reject such software
is having to install something first. I understand it might need
upgrading, but why do Windows machines come without any .NET Framework (or
am I wrong about this)?

It seems that .NET Framework should come with any Window OS, and that it

它确实（自.NET发布以来的所有版本）。

It does (all versions since .NET was released).

应该自动升级ala Windoes更新。似乎过时了要求

should auto-upgrade ala Windoes Update. It seems antiquated to require the

确实如此。

It does.

最终用户安装惰性的东西除非使用，并且是使用VS编写的所有托管软件的基础

！


简单地说，为什么Windows NATIVELY不支持托管代码？

end-user to install something that is inert unless used, and is the basis
of all managed software written using VS!

Put simply, why isn''t managed code supported by Windows NATIVELY?

MS Research正在开发一个纯托管内核（Singularity），你可以在他们的网站上读到它b / b < a rel =nofollowhref =http://research.microsoft.com/os/singularity/target =_ blank> http://research.microsoft.com/os/singularity/ 。


我喜欢很多想法，你实际上会看到基于静态类型检查而不是运行时检查的性能改进

。我不相信CLR等效层是值得的，这可能会损害性能，但是使用静态类型分析来实现高性能消息传递IPC
应该是一个真正的打击。

MS Research has a purely managed kernel (Singularity) under development, you
can read about it on their website
http://research.microsoft.com/os/singularity/.

I like a lot of the ideas, you''ll actually see performance improvements
based on static type checking instead of runtime checks. I''m not convinced
that the CLR equivalent layer is worthwhile, that may hurt performance, but
using static type analysis to enable high-performance message-passing IPC
should be a real hit.

好的。这解释了为什么我的老板，他今年买了他的电脑，要求我

在他的机器上安装.NET Framework 3.0（可重新分发），然后我的

应用程序才能工作，但是一旦安装它就工作得很好？如果预先安装了
，为什么我必须这样做？


Ben Voigt [C ++ MVP]" < rb*@nospam.nospamwrote in message

news：ul ************** @ TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl ...

OK. THen explain why my boss, who bought his computer this year, required me
to install .NET Framework 3.0 (re-distributable) on his machine before my
application would work, but worked fine once I installed it? If it is
pre-installed, why would I have to do this?

"Ben Voigt [C++ MVP]" <rb*@nospam.nospamwrote in message
news:ul**************@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

>

" Peter Anthony" < po ******* @ roundtripllc.comwrote in message

news：OU ************** @ TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl ...

>
"Peter Anthony" <po*******@roundtripllc.comwrote in message
news:OU**************@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

>可以在Vista之前的机器上安装3.5版本的.NET Framework（目前是Beta 2）吗？或者它只是Vista？

并且，为什么.NET Framework没有预先安装操作系统？我认为人们拒绝使用此类软件的主要原因之一是必须先安装一些东西。我知道它可能需要升级，但为什么Windows机器没有任何.NET Framework
（或者我错了）？

似乎.NET Framework应该随附任何Window操作系统，它是

>Can the 3.5 version of .NET Framework (currently Beta 2) be installed on
pre-Vista machines? Or is it Vista-only?

And, why doesn''t .NET Framework come pre-installed with the operating
system? I think one of the main reasons people will reject such software
is having to install something first. I understand it might need
upgrading, but why do Windows machines come without any .NET Framework
(or am I wrong about this)?

It seems that .NET Framework should come with any Window OS, and that it

确实如此（自.NET发布以来的所有版本）。

It does (all versions since .NET was released).

>应该自动升级ala Windoes更新。似乎过时了需要

>should auto-upgrade ala Windoes Update. It seems antiquated to require
the

确实如此。

It does.

>最终用户安装除非使用的惰性东西，并且是使用VS编写的所有托管软件的基础！

简单地说，为什么Windows NATIVELY不支持托管代码？

>end-user to install something that is inert unless used, and is the basis
of all managed software written using VS!

Put simply, why isn''t managed code supported by Windows NATIVELY?

MS Research正在开发一个纯托管内核（Singularity），

你可以在他们的网站上阅读它
< a rel =nofollowhref =http://research.microsoft.com/os/singularity/target =_ blank> http://research.microsoft.com/os/singularity/ 。


我喜欢很多想法，你实际上会看到基于静态类型检查而不是运行时检查的性能改进

。我不是说b / b
确信CLR等效层是值得的，这可能会损害

性能，但是使用静态类型分析来实现高性能

消息传递IPC应该是一个真正的打击。

MS Research has a purely managed kernel (Singularity) under development,
you can read about it on their website
http://research.microsoft.com/os/singularity/.

I like a lot of the ideas, you''ll actually see performance improvements
based on static type checking instead of runtime checks. I''m not
convinced that the CLR equivalent layer is worthwhile, that may hurt
performance, but using static type analysis to enable high-performance
message-passing IPC should be a real hit.

这篇关于.NET Framework 3.5的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！