澄清这一群体的范围 [英] Clarification of the scope of this group

问题描述

我在最近的一个帖子中被告知，因为我使用的一个编译器不支持''命名空间''，所以我不应该使用这个组但是要求

其他地方;也许是comp.lang.c ++。but_without_namespace''？什么是一般的

共识？


Tim

解决方案

Tim Clacy写道：

我在最近的一个帖子中被告知，因为我使用的其中一个编译器不支持''命名空间''，所以我不应该使用这个组一般的共识是什么？

我们谈论C ++标准中提到的所有内容什么都没有

更多，没什么。如果你的编译器不支持命名空间建议

关于如何规避那些不属于标准C ++和

进入编译器特定问题领域的问题这里有一个主题。

相反，你应该在一个组中询问你的编译器是热门的。


-

Unforgiven

大多数人做出概括

Freek de Jonge

Unforgiven写道：< blockquote class =post_quotes> Tim Clacy写道：

我在最近的一个帖子中被告知，因为我使用的其中一个编译器不支持''命名空间''，不应该使用这个小组
但要问别处;也许是comp.lang.c ++。but_without_namespace''？
什么是普遍的共识？
我们谈论C ++标准中提到的所有内容，

C ++标准？我的理解是，即使VC 7.0和gcc在所有方面都不符合
。你是否建议这个小组纯粹是为了抽象，理论上的语言问题而不是实际的实际问题？实际的

语言实现？

仅此而已，没什么。如果您的编译器不支持
命名空间有关如何规避标准C ++的
域以及编译器特定的
问题的建议，这些问题在这里不是主题。相反，你应该在一个组中询问
你的编译器是热门的。

Unforgivable写道：

如果你的编译器不支持命名空间的建议，关于如何绕过标准C ++领域和编译器特定问题领域

我已经失去了我读过建议以避免

''命名空间'的次数，然而你在这里建议你在这里提出一个问题

与不支持命名空间的编译器的变通方法有关

不合适;实际上，你说''不要使用命名空间''，但是如果你需要使用''命名空间''并且你编译器不支持它，那么请问

其他地方:-)

I was advised in a recent thread that, because one of the compilers that I
use does not support ''namespace'', I should not use this group but ask
elsewhere; perhaps comp.lang.c++.but_without_namespace''? What''s the general
consensus?

Tim

解决方案

Tim Clacy wrote:

I was advised in a recent thread that, because one of the compilers
that I use does not support ''namespace'', I should not use this group
but ask elsewhere; perhaps comp.lang.c++.but_without_namespace''?
What''s the general consensus?

We talk about everything that is mentioned in the C++ standard, nothing
more, nothing less. If your compiler does not support namespaces advice
about how to circumvent that falls out of the domain of Standard C++ and
into the domain of compiler-specific issues, which are not topical here.
Instead you should ask in a group where your compiler is topical.

--
Unforgiven

"Most people make generalisations"
Freek de Jonge

Unforgiven wrote:

Tim Clacy wrote:

I was advised in a recent thread that, because one of the compilers
that I use does not support ''namespace'', I should not use this group
but ask elsewhere; perhaps comp.lang.c++.but_without_namespace''?
What''s the general consensus?
We talk about everything that is mentioned in the C++ standard,

THE C++ standard? My understanding is that even VC 7.0 and gcc aren''t
compliant in all respects. Are you suggesting that this group is purely for
abstract, theoretical language issues and not practical issues with actual
language implementations?
nothing more, nothing less. If your compiler does not support
namespaces advice about how to circumvent that falls out of the
domain of Standard C++ and into the domain of compiler-specific
issues, which are not topical here. Instead you should ask in a group
where your compiler is topical.

Unforgivable wrote:

If your compiler does not support namespaces advice about how
to circumvent that falls out of the domain of Standard C++ and
into the domain of compiler-specific issues

I''ve lost count of the number of times I''ve read advice to avoid
''namespace'', and yet here you are suggesting that to ask a question here
related to a workaround for a compiler that doesn''t support namespace is
inappropriate; effectively, you are saying ''don''t use namespace'', but if you
need to use ''namespace'' and you''re compiler doesn''t support it, then ask
elsewhere :-)

这篇关于澄清这一群体的范围的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！