Python / Wx点网 [英] Python/Wx dot net

查看:130
本文介绍了Python / Wx点网的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

您好:


对不起,如果我问的是明显的问题,但我仍然在蟒蛇场景的

边缘。 ..


我正在慢慢地从Delphi / Kylix迁移到Python / Wx以促进

跨平台开发。对于我所做的开发类型,Python特别适合

。我对点网的各种后果也有些不满,但似乎可以想象,在某些时候

任何[前] Win32应用都需要以管理方式运行码。看一下

一点点长期...


python作为点网语言的地位是什么?


Wx作为dot net gui工具包的地位是什么?


BOA能够瞄准点的概率是多少

net?


我肯定在某个地方有一些链接,但名字的愚蠢

(re:.net)正在制作我的搜索无效。任何链接/评论

一般赞赏。


TIA!

Hello:

Sorry if I''m asking obvious questions but I''m still a little on the
fringe of the python scene...

I''m slowly migrating from Delphi/Kylix to Python/Wx to facilitate
cross-platform development. Python in particular is a really good fit
for the type of development I do. I''m also a little shakey on the
ramifications of dot net but it seems conceivable that at some point
any [former]Win32 apps will need to run as managed code. Looking a
little long term...

What''s the status of python as a dot net language?

What''s the status of Wx as a dot net gui toolkit?

What''s the probability of something like BOA being able to target dot
net?

I''m sure there are some links somewhere but the stupidity of the name
(re: .net) is making my searches ineffective. Any links/comments in
general appreciated.

TIA!

推荐答案

ha***@nospam.com (HankC)写道:
ha***@nospam.com (HankC) writes:
什么''作为dot net语言的python的状态?
What''s the status of python as a dot net language?




Python作为CLR的语言不在路上。

有马克·哈蒙德的一个项目,但我觉得很可能已经死了,但是如果你想尝试那就是:
http://starship.python.net/crew/mhammond/dotnet/


有另一个项目(用于.NET的Python绑定)

你可以在那里找到:
http://www.zope.org/Members/Brian/PythonNet

-

劳伦斯押韵 Oluyede
http://loluyede.blogspot.com
rh **** @ NOSPAMmyself.com



Python as a language for the CLR is not on the way.
There was a project by Mark Hammond but I think is quite
dead, but if you want to try is there:
http://starship.python.net/crew/mhammond/dotnet/

There is another project (Python bindings for .NET)
that you can find there:
http://www.zope.org/Members/Brian/PythonNet

--
Lawrence "Rhymes" Oluyede
http://loluyede.blogspot.com
rh****@NOSPAMmyself.com


HankC写道:

我正在慢慢地从Delphi / Kylix迁移到Python / Wx以促进跨平台开发。对于我所做的开发类型,Python特别适合。我对点网的影响也有点不确定,但似乎可以想象,在某些时候,任何[前] Win32应用程序都需要作为托管代码运行。看起来很长一段时间......

python作为点网语言的地位是什么?

Wx的状态是什么作为一个dot net gui工具包?

BOA能够以dot
net为目标的概率是多少?

I''m slowly migrating from Delphi/Kylix to Python/Wx to facilitate
cross-platform development. Python in particular is a really good fit
for the type of development I do. I''m also a little shakey on the
ramifications of dot net but it seems conceivable that at some point
any [former]Win32 apps will need to run as managed code. Looking a
little long term...

What''s the status of python as a dot net language?

What''s the status of Wx as a dot net gui toolkit?

What''s the probability of something like BOA being able to target dot
net?




这就是我要问的问题:dot net的未来是什么?


Python已经超越了至少两个主要的微软新举措,

我相信,并且似乎也可能比.NET更长。


我更加相信Python社区提供有用的,

交叉平台,强大而有趣的环境比我在微软提供的任何单一的一样。


我的建议:学习如何使用Python。用它来解决问题。

如果在某些时候它支持.NET,那么你就可以很好地写入这个API了,但是你也可以在.NET成为历史上的另一个脚注之后很久仍然可以写出好的

程序。


-Peter



Here''s the question I would ask: what''s the future of dot net?

Python has outlasted at least two major new Microsoft initiatives,
I believe, and seems likely to outlive .NET as well.

I hvae more faith in the Python community to provide useful,
cross-platform, robust, and fun environments than I do in Microsoft
to do provide any single one of those.

My suggestion: learn to use Python well. Use it to solve problems.
If at some point it supports .NET, you''ll be well positioned to
write to that API, but you''ll also still be able to write good
programs long after .NET is yet another footnote in history.

-Peter


Peter Hansen写道:

....
Peter Hansen wrote:
....
这是我要问的问题:未来的问题是什么? dot net?
Here''s the question I would ask: what''s the future of dot net?



Shane'的网站可能是一个不错的链接,可以看到一个小的
软件开发公司谁考虑过转移到.NET并决定跳过它:

http://www.skippingdot.net/

当然,那里有偏见(和所有地方一样)。尽管如此,.NET确实将b b $ b作为一种营销策略而被淘汰,而且b $ b营销是.NET故事的90%。


有很多东西可以从火车残骸中拯救

(有很多好主意;内省的捆绑,

十字架的标准 - 语言模块接口定义,内置网络

库),但是在它撞到stantion之前就跳上火车

尝试将它们拉出来似乎不太有用。


花费宝贵的资源将wx绑定到.NET或Python上,对于这个问题来说,似乎是浪费。当然,如果你有一个特别的问题,你需要花费时间来投入时间,但如果不这样的话,那么它就不会特别好了。拉动Python列车的引擎。


Shane''s web-site might be a decent link here to get the view of a small
software development company who''d considered moving to .NET and decided
to skip it:

http://www.skippingdot.net/

Of course, there''s a bias there (as everywhere). Still, .NET does
appear to be falling by the wayside as a marketing strategy, and
marketing is 90% of the .NET story.

There are lots of things that can be salvaged from the train-wreck
(there were lots of good ideas; introspectable bundles, standards for
cross-language module interface definitions, built-in networking
libraries), but jumping on the train just before it hits the stantion to
try to pull them out seems less than useful.

Spending precious resources binding wx to .NET, or Python, for that
matter, seems rather a waste. Sure, if there''s a particular problem you
run into where you need it, devote the time, but without that, it
doesn''t seem a particularly good engine to pull the Python train.


这篇关于Python / Wx点网的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆