.Net版权所有 [英] .Net Copyright

问题描述

你好，


我不是合法的beagal，但是从我的理解，如果你想拥有权利

你需要一个想法专利。如果您无法获得专利，那么您的下一个最佳

选项是版权。然而，任何人都可以简单地通过

来确保他们的功能，尽管它们的功能相同，但是以稍微不同的方式生成。


这是否意味着简单地在VB中重写C＃代码就足以绕过

版权？


谢谢

Richard

Howdy,

I''m no legal beagal but from what i understand if you want to own the rights
to an idea you need a patent. If you cant get a patent then your next best
option is a copyright. However anyone can get around copyright simply by
ensuring their functionality albeit the same, is produced in a slightly
different way.

Does this mean that simply rewriting C# code in VB is enough to bypass
copyright?

Thanks
Richard

推荐答案

2004年5月7日星期五12:23:20 +1200，spamfurnace写道：

On Fri, 7 May 2004 12:23:20 +1200, spamfurnace wrote:

你好，

我不是合法的beagal，但是根据我的理解，如果你想拥有你需要专利的想法的权利。如果您无法获得专利，那么您的下一个最佳选择是版权。然而，任何人都可以简单地通过
确保它们的功能相同，以稍微不同的方式产生版权。

这是否意味着简单地在VB中重写C＃代码是足以绕过版权？

谢谢
理查德

Howdy,

I''m no legal beagal but from what i understand if you want to own the rights
to an idea you need a patent. If you cant get a patent then your next best
option is a copyright. However anyone can get around copyright simply by
ensuring their functionality albeit the same, is produced in a slightly
different way.

Does this mean that simply rewriting C# code in VB is enough to bypass
copyright?

Thanks
Richard

不 - 这将是一项衍生作品。 ，意思是你的VB基于C＃的
，并且合法属于原作者。

-

auric"下划线" "下划线" "在" hotmail" dot" com

*****

我试过一次吸食可乐。我几乎淹死了。

Nope - that would be a "derivative work", meaning your VB was based on
the C#, and legally belonged to the original author.
--
auric "underscore" "underscore" "at" hotmail "dot" com
*****
I tried snorting coke once. I almost drowned.

我不知道你问题的合法答案，但是另一种语言是翻译，而不是改动。用西班牙语乱世佳人仍然是乱世佳人


franco，mis queridos，yo no dan una maldici？3n

I don''t know the legal answer to your question, but one language to another is a translation, not an alteration. ''Gone with the Wind'' in spanish is still ''Gone with the Wind''

franco, mis queridos, yo no dan una maldici?3n

我不知道你在追求什么，但是，一般来说，一件作品 - 比如说>
软件程序可以为您的某个

客户提供特定月份的发票 - 可以在美国国会图书馆拥有版权。是的，该计划

是独一无二的 - 除了你之外没有其他人写过该代码，但

版权的所有者可能是你的客户，如果他/她委托你开发

该软件。


有关MJ Salone撰写的文字 - 如何使用版权软件。它是
写于1990年，但仍然是关于

版权问题和软件的法律。


HTH，


Bernie Yaeger


" spamfurnace" < SP ********* @ intermension.com>在消息中写道

新闻：例如************* @ TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl ...

Hi,

I''m not sure what you''re after, but, generally, a piece of work - say a
software program that totals invoices for a given month for one of your
customers - can be copyrighted in the Library of Congress. Yes, the program
is unique - no one else wrote that code but you, but the owner of the
copyright may well be your client, if he/she commissioned you to develop
that software.

There''s a text on this written by MJ Salone - How to copyright software. It
was written in 1990 but is still current with respect to the law on
copyright issues and software.

HTH,

Bernie Yaeger

"spamfurnace" <sp*********@intermension.com> wrote in message
news:eg*************@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...

你好，

我不是合法的beagal但是根据我的理解，如果你想拥有你需要专利的想法的
权利。如果您无法获得专利，那么您的下一个最佳选择是版权。然而，任何人都可以简单地通过
确保它们的功能相同，以稍微不同的方式产生版权。

这是否意味着简单地在VB中重写C＃代码是足以绕过版权？

谢谢
理查德

Howdy,

I''m no legal beagal but from what i understand if you want to own the rights to an idea you need a patent. If you cant get a patent then your next best
option is a copyright. However anyone can get around copyright simply by
ensuring their functionality albeit the same, is produced in a slightly
different way.

Does this mean that simply rewriting C# code in VB is enough to bypass
copyright?

Thanks
Richard

这篇关于.Net版权所有的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！