迭代器和版本控制 [英] Iterators and versioning

问题描述

我注意到使用迭代器可以修改集合，而

枚举它的元素。这是设计还是仅仅是他们实施的b / b $ b $的副作用？查看生成的类的反汇编I

请注意编译器生成的枚举器没有版本检查。有没有

在www的任何地方对此进行深入分析？


谢谢


kh

I notice that using iterators it is possible to modify a collection whilst
enumerating over it''s elements. Is this by design or just a side-effect of
their implementation? Viewing the disassembly for the generated classes I
note that the compiler-generated enumerator has no version checking. Is there
an in-depth analysis of this on the www anywhere?

Thanks

kh

推荐答案

我不明白这个问题......你是否在通过

集合进行迭代时说，你有一个方法来修改它吗？..如果是这样，修改的方法是作为集合对象的一部分给出的

，你不应该使用它而

迭代通过清单


VJ


" kh" < [e-mail]>在留言中写道

新闻：F3 ********************************** @ microsof t.com ...

I don''t understand this question... are you saying while iterating through a
collection, you have a method to modify it?.. if so, the method to modify is
given as part of the collection object, you should not use it while
iterating through the list

VJ

"kh" <[e-mail]> wrote in message
news:F3**********************************@microsof t.com...

我注意到使用迭代器可以修改一个集合，同时枚举它的元素。这是设计还是仅仅是其实施的副作用？查看生成的类的反汇编我注意到编译器生成的枚举器没有版本检查。是否
在www的任何地方对此进行深入分析？

谢谢

kh

I notice that using iterators it is possible to modify a collection whilst
enumerating over it''s elements. Is this by design or just a side-effect of
their implementation? Viewing the disassembly for the generated classes I
note that the compiler-generated enumerator has no version checking. Is
there
an in-depth analysis of this on the www anywhere?

Thanks

kh

这是我的问题的一部分?????????

it s part of my question ?????????

我不明白什么这个问题要么是


VJ


< mu ************ @ gmail.com>在消息中写道

news：11 ********************** @ v46g2000cwv.googlegr oups.com ...

i don''t understand what this question is either

VJ

<mu************@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:11**********************@v46g2000cwv.googlegr oups.com...

这是我的问题的一部分??????????

it s part of my question ?????????

这篇关于迭代器和版本控制的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！