Access 2007富文本缺陷？ [英] Access 2007 Rich Text Deficiencies?
问题描述
我几天前发布过，在我看来，Access 2007富文本
功能不支持：a）全文理由; b）程序化
操纵。
我希望有人可能知道这种或那种方式是否是b / b
true或没有，或者可以指向我的文章或帮助文本。到目前为止我在网上和Access 2007帮助中看到的内容似乎证实了上述情况。
但是（或者至少（b））看起来不可思议所以。
我需要做出关于实现富文本功能的决定，而我需要决定是使用Access 2007还是使用第三个 - 派对控制。
以上的答案将决定我的决定。
因此，如果任何人有任何信息。以上，或者可以指向一篇
的文章，非常感谢。到目前为止，我还没有找到任何东西。
谢谢！
Neil
I posted a few days ago that it seems to me that the Access 2007 rich text
feature does not support: a) full text justification; b) programmatic
manipulation.
I was hoping that someone might know one way or the other whether that was
true or not, or could point me to an article or help text that would. What I
have seen so far online and in Access 2007 help seems to confirm the above.
But that (or at least (b)) seems incredible that it would be so.
I need to make a decision regarding implementing rich text features, and I
need to decide whether to go with Access 2007 or use a third-party control.
The answer to the above will determine my decision.
Thus, if anyone has any information re. the above, or could point me to an
article that does, it would be greatly appreciated. So far, I have not been
able to find anything.
Thank you!
Neil
推荐答案
Neil写道：
Neil wrote:
我几天前发布的，在我看来， Access 2007富文本
功能不支持：a）全文理由; b）程序化
操纵。
我希望有人可能知道这种或那种方式是否是b / b
true或没有，或者可以指向我的文章或帮助文本。到目前为止我在网上和Access 2007帮助中看到的内容似乎证实了上述情况。
但是（或者至少（b））看起来不可思议所以。
我需要做出关于实现富文本功能的决定，而我需要决定是使用Access 2007还是使用第三个 - 派对控制。
上述答案将决定我的决定。
I posted a few days ago that it seems to me that the Access 2007 rich text
feature does not support: a) full text justification; b) programmatic
manipulation.
I was hoping that someone might know one way or the other whether that was
true or not, or could point me to an article or help text that would. What I
have seen so far online and in Access 2007 help seems to confirm the above.
But that (or at least (b)) seems incredible that it would be so.
I need to make a decision regarding implementing rich text features, and I
need to decide whether to go with Access 2007 or use a third-party control.
The answer to the above will determine my decision.
我从Allen Browne那里看到了A2007问题的精彩汇编：
http://allenbrowne.com/Access2007.html
-
''--------------------------
''John Mishefske
''UtterAccess编辑器
''2007 Microsoft Access MVP
''---------------------- ----
I saw this nice compilation of issues with A2007 from Allen Browne:
http://allenbrowne.com/Access2007.html
--
''--------------------------
'' John Mishefske
'' UtterAccess Editor
'' 2007 Microsoft Access MVP
''--------------------------
谢谢，约翰。是的，我检查了艾伦的名单。这是一个很好的资源。我实际上已经给他发了一张关于这两个缺陷的说明，看看他是否想把他们加到他的名单上，但我还没有看到任何东西或听到过从他那里回来。
Neil
" John Mishefske" < jm ********** @ SPAMyahoo.com写信息
news：46 ******************** *** @ roadrunner.com ...
Thanks, John. Yes, I checked Allen''s list. It''s a great resource. I actually
sent him a note about these two deficiencies, to see if he wanted to add
them to his list, but I haven''t seen anything there or heard back from him.
Neil
"John Mishefske" <jm**********@SPAMyahoo.comwrote in message
news:46***********************@roadrunner.com...
Neil写道：
Neil wrote:
>我发布了一个几天前，在我看来，Access 2007丰富的
文本功能不支持：a）全文理由; b）程序化操作。
我希望有人可能知道某种方式或其他方式是否真实，或者可以指向我的文章或帮助文本那会是。
到目前为止我在网上和Access 2007帮助中看到的内容似乎确认了以上内容。但是那（或者至少（b））看起来很不可思议。
我需要做出关于实现富文本功能的决定，而且我需要决定是使用Access 2007还是使用第三方
控件。上述答案将决定我的决定。
>I posted a few days ago that it seems to me that the Access 2007 rich
text feature does not support: a) full text justification; b)
programmatic manipulation.
I was hoping that someone might know one way or the other whether that
was true or not, or could point me to an article or help text that would.
What I have seen so far online and in Access 2007 help seems to confirm
the above. But that (or at least (b)) seems incredible that it would be
so.
I need to make a decision regarding implementing rich text features, and
I need to decide whether to go with Access 2007 or use a third-party
control. The answer to the above will determine my decision.
我从Allen Browne那里看到了A2007问题的精彩汇编：
http://allenbrowne.com/Access2007.html
-
''--------------------------
''John Mishefske
''UtterAccess编辑器
''2007 Microsoft Access MVP
''---------------------- ----
I saw this nice compilation of issues with A2007 from Allen Browne:
http://allenbrowne.com/Access2007.html
--
''--------------------------
'' John Mishefske
'' UtterAccess Editor
'' 2007 Microsoft Access MVP
''--------------------------
Neil，我不明白你对无法分配价值的评论
编程。
大概你有一个文本框绑定到备注字段，其中富文本设置为
，或者是未绑定的文本框或文本框绑定到表达式，并设置Rich
Text属性。如果是这种情况，您应该能够将
控制源设置为：
="这有一个< b>粗体< / dword。"
同样，你可以粘贴包含项目符号列表等的文本。
在HTML中，你可以证明一段文字是正确的像这样：
< p align =" justify">
我想你是说A2007富文本框没有渲染
正确。
-
Allen Browne - 微软MVP。西澳大利亚珀斯
访问用户提示 - http：// allenbrowne .com / tips.html
回复群组，而不是mvps dot org的allenbrowne。
" Neil" < no **** @ nospam.netwrote in message
news：GF ******************* @ newssvr23.news.prodigy。 net ...
Neil, I don''t understand your comment about not being able to assign values
programmatically.
Presumably you have a text box bound to a Memo field where the Rich Text is
set, or an unbound text box or text box bound to an expression, and the Rich
Text property is set. If that''s the case, you should be able to set the
Control Source to something like:
="This has a <b>bold</dword."
Likewise, you can paste in text containing bulleted lists etc.
In HTML, you can justify a paragraph of text like this:
<p align="justify">
I guess you are saying that the A2007 rich text box does not render that
correctly.
--
Allen Browne - Microsoft MVP. Perth, Western Australia
Tips for Access users - http://allenbrowne.com/tips.html
Reply to group, rather than allenbrowne at mvps dot org.
"Neil" <no****@nospam.netwrote in message
news:GF*******************@newssvr23.news.prodigy. net...
谢谢，John。是的，我检查了艾伦的名单。这是一个很好的资源。我实际上给他发了一张关于这两个缺点的说明，看看他是否想要将b
添加到他的清单中，但我还没有看到任何东西或听到过返回
来自他。
Neil
" John Mishefske" < jm ********** @ SPAMyahoo.com写信息
news：46 ******************** *** @ roadrunner.com ...
Thanks, John. Yes, I checked Allen''s list. It''s a great resource. I
actually sent him a note about these two deficiencies, to see if he wanted
to add them to his list, but I haven''t seen anything there or heard back
from him.
Neil
"John Mishefske" <jm**********@SPAMyahoo.comwrote in message
news:46***********************@roadrunner.com...
> Neil写道：
>Neil wrote:
>>我几天前发布过，在我看来Access 2007丰富的文本功能不支持：a）全文理由; b）程序化操作。
我希望有人可能知道某种方式或其他方式是否真实，或者可以指向我的文章或帮助文本
会的。到目前为止我在网上和Access 2007中看到的帮助似乎确认了以上内容。但是那个（或至少（b））似乎不可思议它会如此。
我需要做出关于实现富文本功能的决定，并且我需要决定是使用Access 2007还是使用第三方
控件。上述答案将决定我的决定。
>>I posted a few days ago that it seems to me that the Access 2007 rich
text feature does not support: a) full text justification; b)
programmatic manipulation.
I was hoping that someone might know one way or the other whether that
was true or not, or could point me to an article or help text that
would. What I have seen so far online and in Access 2007 help seems to
confirm the above. But that (or at least (b)) seems incredible that it
would be so.
I need to make a decision regarding implementing rich text features, and
I need to decide whether to go with Access 2007 or use a third-party
control. The answer to the above will determine my decision.
我从Allen Browne那里看到了A2007问题的精彩汇编：
http://allenbrowne.com/Access2007.html
-
''-------- ------------------
''John Mishefske
''UtterAccess Editor
''2007 Microsoft Access MVP
'' --------------------------
I saw this nice compilation of issues with A2007 from Allen Browne:
http://allenbrowne.com/Access2007.html
--
''--------------------------
'' John Mishefske
'' UtterAccess Editor
'' 2007 Microsoft Access MVP
''--------------------------
这篇关于Access 2007富文本缺陷？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
