80列宽？ 132列宽？ [英] 80 columns wide? 132 columns wide?
问题描述
在对七个公约文件的评论中，我发现了两个文件宽度为
的文件。克罗克福德说80; Nextapp说132.
我喜欢80，所以我可以在宽屏显示器上同时看到几个文件。
想法？
In a review of seven conventions documents I found two that addressed
file width. Crockford says 80; Nextapp says 132.
I like 80 so I can see several files at once on my wide monitor.
Thoughts?
推荐答案
Martin Rinehart< Ma ************ @ gmail.comwrites：
Martin Rinehart <Ma************@gmail.comwrites:
在对七个公约文件的审查中，我找到了两个解决了
文件宽度的文件。克罗克福德说80; Nextapp说132.
我喜欢80，所以我可以在宽屏显示器上同时看到几个文件。
想法？
In a review of seven conventions documents I found two that addressed
file width. Crockford says 80; Nextapp says 132.
I like 80 so I can see several files at once on my wide monitor.
Thoughts?
80是传统的 - 它是许多原始
终端的宽度。 132是有点宽，恕我直言，你可以去最宽，
，仍然可读。我认为80是一个很好的拍摄宽度，但
偶尔的线可以比那更好，如果它的工作/读取更好
（如果你已经有一些嵌套的长方法名称，例如）。
-
Joost Diepenmaat |博客： http://joost.zeekat.nl/ |工作： http://zeekat.nl/
80 is "traditional" - it''s the width of many of the original
terminals. 132 is a bit wide, and IMHO just about the widest you can go
and still be readable. I think 80 is a good width to shoot for, but the
occasional line can go a bit wider than that if that works/reads better
(if you''ve got a few nested long method names, for example).
--
Joost Diepenmaat | blog: http://joost.zeekat.nl/ | work: http://zeekat.nl/
Joost Diepenmaat写道：
Joost Diepenmaat wrote:
80是传统的 - 它是许多原始
终端的宽度。 132是有点宽，恕我直言，你可以去最宽，
，仍然可读。我认为80是一个很好的拍摄宽度，但
偶尔的线可以比那更好，如果它的工作/读取更好
（如果你已经有一些嵌套的长方法名称，例如）。
80 is "traditional" - it''s the width of many of the original
terminals. 132 is a bit wide, and IMHO just about the widest you can go
and still be readable. I think 80 is a good width to shoot for, but the
occasional line can go a bit wider than that if that works/reads better
(if you''ve got a few nested long method names, for example).
我的编辑器智能地包装超宽线。这现在是一个常见的
编辑器功能吗？如果是这样，我们应该给予任何约定宽度
启动。
P.S.我以前写的杂志最多有52个字符列。
My editor wraps overwidth lines intelligently. Is this now a common
editor feature? If so, we should give any convention re width the
boot.
P.S. I used to write for a magazine with a 52 char column max.
在comp.lang.javascript消息< 26406335-3132-4db5-b102-af9828d3cc47 @ e1
g2000pra.googlegroups.com>，星期五，2008年10月31日14:34:23，Martin Rinehart
< Ma ************ @ gmail.composted：
In comp.lang.javascript message <26406335-3132-4db5-b102-af9828d3cc47@e1
g2000pra.googlegroups.com>, Fri, 31 Oct 2008 14:34:23, Martin Rinehart
<Ma************@gmail.composted:
>在对七个约定文件的评论中，我发现了两个解决了文件宽度的问题。克罗克福德说80; Nextapp说132.
我喜欢80，所以我可以在宽屏显示器上同时看到几个文件。
想法？
>In a review of seven conventions documents I found two that addressed
file width. Crockford says 80; Nextapp says 132.
I like 80 so I can see several files at once on my wide monitor.
Thoughts?
使用72，如FAQ推荐的那样;然后你可以将你的代码发布到新闻中
没有其他问题。
-
（c）John Stockton，nr伦敦英国。 ?@merlyn.demon.co.uk DOS 3.3,6.20; WinXP。
Web< URL：http：//www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/- FAQqish topics，acronyms&链接。
PAS EXE TXT ZIP via< URL：http：//www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/programs/00index.htm>
我的DOS< ;网址：http：//www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/batfiles.htm-也是batprogs.htm。
Use 72, as the FAQ recommends; then you can post your code to News with
no additional problems.
--
(c) John Stockton, nr London UK. ?@merlyn.demon.co.uk DOS 3.3, 6.20; WinXP.
Web <URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/- FAQqish topics, acronyms & links.
PAS EXE TXT ZIP via <URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/programs/00index.htm>
My DOS <URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/batfiles.htm- also batprogs.htm.
这篇关于80列宽？ 132列宽？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
