35％没有JavaScript？ [英] 35% without JavaScript?
问题描述
人们经常在ciwah说''但没有
JavaScript的用户怎么样？''所以我决定做一个实验。它建议35％
互联网用户没有在他们的浏览器中打开JavaScript。如果这里的人看了我的实验页面，我会感激你的话。
告诉我他们是否看到任何方法上的缺陷，然后才去br />
更广泛地宣传它：
http://www.safalra.com/hypertext/html/nojavascript.html
---萨法拉（Stephen Morley）---
http://www.safalra.com/hypertext
Frequently in ciwah people say ''but what about the users without
JavaScript?'', so I decided to do an experiment. It suggests 35%
internet users do not have JavaScript turned on in their browsers. I''d
appreciate it if people here had a look at my page on the experiment,
and tell me if they see any methodological flaws, before I go and
publicise it more widely:
http://www.safalra.com/hypertext/html/nojavascript.html
--- Safalra (Stephen Morley) ---
http://www.safalra.com/hypertext
推荐答案
2004年3月5日09:49:01 -0800，Safalra写道：
On 5 Mar 2004 09:49:01 -0800, Safalra wrote:
http://www.safalra.com/hypertext/html/nojavascript.html
有趣的数字，那个页面上您通常的人口统计是什么？那将是可能偏见的最大单一来源。
哦，你错过了拼错的MurkoSoft ..errr
MircoSoft，.. * _MicroSoft_在最后一部分
页面。 ;-)
-
Andrew Thompson
* http://www.PhySci.org/ 开源软件套件
* http://www.PhySci.org/codes/ Web& IT帮助
* http://www.1point1C.org/科学&技术
Interesting figure, what is your usual
demographic at that page? That would be
the single biggest source of possible bias.
Oh, and you miss-spelled MurkoSoft ..errr
MircoSoft, ..err _MicroSoft_ in the last part
of the page. ;-)
--
Andrew Thompson
* http://www.PhySci.org/ Open-source software suite
* http://www.PhySci.org/codes/ Web & IT Help
* http://www.1point1C.org/ Science & Technology
" Safalra" <我们**** @ safalra.com>在消息中写道
news：c5 ************************** @ posting.google.c om ...
"Safalra" <us****@safalra.com> wrote in message
news:c5**************************@posting.google.c om...
经常在ciwah中人们说''但是没有JavaScript的用户怎么样？''，所以我决定做一个实验。它表明35％的互联网用户没有在他们的浏览器中打开JavaScript。
不，它表明35％的SETI @ home用户（谁在2月X和2月X + 14之间访问了错误代码
页面）没有JavaScript打开它
浏览器。没有任何迹象表明这个特定网站的访问者
代表了所有互联网用户的整体。你的实验是针对非常具体的观众，而且我认为并不是多样化的，足以得出35％的互联网用户的结论。没有打开JavaScript。
如果这里的人看了我的实验页面，我会很感激，
并告诉我是否他们在我去之前看到任何方法上的缺陷并且更广泛地宣传它：
Frequently in ciwah people say ''but what about the users without
JavaScript?'', so I decided to do an experiment. It suggests 35%
internet users do not have JavaScript turned on in their browsers.
No, it suggests that 35% of SETI@home users (who visited the Error Codes
page between Feb. X and Feb X+14) do not have JavaScript turned on it thier
browsers. There is nothing that suggests visitors of this particular site
represent all internet users as a whole. Your experiment is geared towards
a very specific audience, and I would say is not diverse enough to conclude
that 35% of "internet users" do not have JavaScript turned on.
I''d
appreciate it if people here had a look at my page on the experiment,
and tell me if they see any methodological flaws, before I go and
publicise it more widely:
考虑到有数百万人在浏览网页，我认为这是一个
859人的抽样几乎不足以得出任何真正的结论。在
中，你应该使用< noscript>你的
实验中的元素，而不是你创建的黑客，它永远不会关闭开头
评论（因此，我不确定输出会如何保持一致一个
不同浏览器的数量。）
例如：
< script language =" javascript">
document.write（''< a href = setierrorsjs.txt>一个新位置< / a>。''）;
< / script>
< noscript>
< a href = setierrorsnojs.html>新位置< / a> ;.
< / noscript>
我认为你的实验有缺陷，结果有问题。
问候，
彼得福蒂
Considering that there are millions of people browsing the web, I think a
sampling of 859 people is hardly enough to make any real conclusions. In
addition, you should be making use of the <noscript> element in your
experiment, rather than the hack you created, which never closes the opening
comment (thus, I''m not sure how consistent the output would be accross a
number of different browsers).
For example:
<script language="javascript">
document.write(''<a href=setierrorsjs.txt>a new location</a>.'');
</script>
<noscript>
<a href=setierrorsnojs.html>a new location</a>.
</noscript>
I think your experiment is flawed, and the results questionable.
Regards,
Peter Foti
" Peter Foti" < PE *** @ Idontwantnostinkingemailfromyou.com>在消息中写道
news：10 ************* @ corp.supernews.com ...
"Peter Foti" <pe***@Idontwantnostinkingemailfromyou.com> wrote in message
news:10*************@corp.supernews.com...
" Safalra" <我们**** @ safalra.com>在消息中写道
新闻：c5 ************************** @ posting.google.c om ...
"Safalra" <us****@safalra.com> wrote in message
news:c5**************************@posting.google.c om...
经常在ciwah人们说''但是没有JavaScript的用户怎么样？''，所以我决定做一个实验。它表明35％的互联网用户没有在他们的浏览器中打开JavaScript。
不，它表明35％的SETI @ home用户（他们在2月份之间访问了错误代码页面）。 X和2月X + 14）没有打开JavaScript
Frequently in ciwah people say ''but what about the users without
JavaScript?'', so I decided to do an experiment. It suggests 35%
internet users do not have JavaScript turned on in their browsers.
No, it suggests that 35% of SETI@home users (who visited the Error Codes
page between Feb. X and Feb X+14) do not have JavaScript turned on it
他们的浏览器。没有任何迹象表明这个特定网站的访问者代表了所有互联网用户的整体。你的实验面向非常具体的受众群体，我认为它的多样性不足以让b $ b得出35％的互联网用户的结论。没有打开JavaScript。
thier browsers. There is nothing that suggests visitors of this particular site
represent all internet users as a whole. Your experiment is geared
towards a very specific audience, and I would say is not diverse enough to
conclude that 35% of "internet users" do not have JavaScript turned on.
如果这里的人看了我的实验页面，我会很感激，
并告诉我他们是否看到任何方法上的缺陷，然后我更广泛地宣传它：
I''d
appreciate it if people here had a look at my page on the experiment,
and tell me if they see any methodological flaws, before I go and
publicise it more widely:
考虑到有数百万人浏览网页，我认为< 859人的抽样几乎不足以得出任何真正的结论。
Considering that there are millions of people browsing the web, I think a
sampling of 859 people is hardly enough to make any real conclusions.
这可能不是真的。正如我记得的那样，当使用有效的抽样技术时，
美国
居民的有效是或否民意调查所需的主题数量，其置信区间为只要不需要人口统计故障，只需要5个百分点即可获得大约1,000美元的奖金。
This may not be true. When valid sampling techniques are used, as I recall,
the number of subjects required for a valid yes-or-no poll of U.S.
residents, for the confidence interval to be 5 percentage points, is
something around 1,000, as long as no demographic breakdowns are required..
这篇关于35％没有JavaScript？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
