Adobe GoLive的HTML-Kit：我应该切换吗？ [英] HTML-Kit to Adobe GoLive: should I switch?

问题描述

我应该从使用HTML-Kit切换到使用Adobe GoLive吗？我只是一个志愿者，是一个小型非营利组织的网站管理员。我是在网站上工作的唯一的人。我试图从HTML-Kit切换到GoLive的唯一原因就是我可以获得学术版

便宜（70美元）。


我一直在用HTML-Kit手工编写简单的代码，因为它是免费的b $ b，以免后来调试膨胀标签汤一些

编辑吐出来，并保持较小的文件大小。这是一个过时的

观点吗？如果我有GoLive 7.0，我可以快乐地制作更多

有趣的页面而不需要编码吗？


谢谢！

Teffy

解决方案

70 USD）。


我一直用HTML-Kit手工编写简单的代码因为它是免费的b $ b，为了避免以后再回去调试臃肿的标签汤一些

编辑吐出来，并保持小文件大小。这是一个过时的

观点吗？如果我有GoLive 7.0，我可以快乐地制作更多

有趣的页面而不需要编码吗？


谢谢！

Teffy

Teffy写道：

我应该从使用HTML-Kit切换到使用Adobe GoLive吗？


No.


我只是一名志愿者，是一个小型非营利组织的网站管理员。我是网站上唯一的工作人员。我试图从HTML-Kit切换到GoLive的唯一原因是我可以获得便宜的学术版本（

70 USD）。

编号手工编码是编写IMO的最佳方式。


如果我使用GoLive 7.0，我可以愉快地制作更有趣的页面无需编码？

谢谢！
Teffy

我非常怀疑。软件永远无法实际补偿真实的思维，真实的计划，真实的设计。一个软件将无法实际做出头脑清醒的决定，能够更新自己的b $ b，阅读文章，教程，阅读新闻组等。


DU

-

Javascript和浏览器错误：
http://www10.brinkster.com/doctorunclear/

- Netscape 7的资源，帮助和提示。 x用户和作曲家

- 弹出窗口上的交互式演示，Netscape 7.x中的音乐（音频/ midi）
http://www10.brinkster.com/doctorunc...e7Section.html

Should I switch from using HTML-Kit to using Adobe GoLive? I am just
a volunteer who is webmaster for a small non-profit group. I am the
only person working on the site. The only reason I am tempted to
switch from HTML-Kit to GoLive is that I can get an academic version
for cheap ($70 USD).

I have been doing simple coding by hand with HTML-Kit because it is
free, to avoid having to go back later to debug bloated tag soup some
editors spit out, and to keep file size small. Is this an outdated
view of things? If I got GoLive 7.0, could I merrily make more
interesting pages without having to code at all?

Thanks!
Teffy

解决方案

70 USD).

I have been doing simple coding by hand with HTML-Kit because it is
free, to avoid having to go back later to debug bloated tag soup some
editors spit out, and to keep file size small. Is this an outdated
view of things? If I got GoLive 7.0, could I merrily make more
interesting pages without having to code at all?

Thanks!
Teffy

Teffy wrote:

Should I switch from using HTML-Kit to using Adobe GoLive?
No.

I am just a volunteer who is webmaster for a small non-profit group. I am the
only person working on the site. The only reason I am tempted to
switch from HTML-Kit to GoLive is that I can get an academic version
for cheap (

70 USD).

I have been doing simple coding by hand with HTML-Kit because it is
free, to avoid having to go back later to debug bloated tag soup some
editors spit out, and to keep file size small. Is this an outdated
view of things?
No. Hand-coding is the best way to code IMO.

If I got GoLive 7.0, could I merrily make more interesting pages without having to code at all?

Thanks!
Teffy

I doubt it very much. A software will never be able to actually
compensate real thinking, real planning, real designing. A software will
never be able to actually make level-headed decision, be able to update
itself, read articles, tutorials, read newsgroups, etc..

DU
--
Javascript and Browser bugs:
http://www10.brinkster.com/doctorunclear/
- Resources, help and tips for Netscape 7.x users and Composer
- Interactive demos on Popup windows, music (audio/midi) in Netscape 7.x
http://www10.brinkster.com/doctorunc...e7Section.html

这篇关于Adobe GoLive的HTML-Kit：我应该切换吗？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！