用于循环扩展语法 [英] For loop extended syntax

问题描述

我肯定一定有关于这个主题的过去主题，但我不知道如何找到它：

如何扩展for< X>在"语法，以便X可以包含默认参数？这对于列表/生成器理解非常有用，例如能够写出如下内容：


[x * yz for（x，y， z = 0）in（1,2,3），（4,5），（6,7,8）]


而不是不那么优雅的显式循环版本检查每个序列的长度。

您怎么看？


George

I''m sure there must have been a past thread about this topic but I don''t know how to find it: How
about extending the "for <X> in" syntax so that X can include default arguments ? This would be very
useful for list/generator comprehensions, for example being able to write something like:

[x*y-z for (x,y,z=0) in (1,2,3), (4,5), (6,7,8)]

instead of the less elegant explicit loop version that has to check for the length of each sequence.
What do you think ?

George

推荐答案

George Sakkis写道：

George Sakkis wrote:

这对于列表/生成器理解非常有用，例如能够
写出如下内容：
[x * yz表示（1,2,3），（4,5），（6,7,8）中的（x，y，z = 0）]

This would be very
useful for list/generator comprehensions, for example being able to write something like:
[x*y-z for (x,y,z=0) in (1,2,3), (4,5), (6,7,8)]

看起来非常吸引人，但是如何处理


[x * yz for（x = 0，y，z）in（1,2,3）， （4,5），（6,7,8）]？

由于模式不匹配会引发异常吗？


如果没有，匹配规则应该如何应用？


[x * yz for（x = 0，y = 0，z = 0）in（1,2,3），（4 ，5），（6,7， 8）]


如果有疑问，请写一个关心正确填充的矢量类（

或更多一般和具有几何意义：选择正确的超平面

）并允许在不同的填充之间切换。这个解决方案是灵活的和可重复使用的
。


问候凯

Looks very appealing, but what to do with

[x*y-z for (x=0,y,z) in (1,2,3), (4,5), (6,7,8)] ?

Should it raise an exception due to a pattern mismatch?

If not how should matching rules apply here?

[x*y-z for (x=0,y=0,z=0) in (1,2,3), (4,5), (6,7,8)]

If in doubt write a vector class that cares about the correct padding (
or more general and with geometric meaning: select the right hyperplane
) and enable to switch between different paddings. This solution is
both flexible and reusable.

Regards Kay

George Sakkis写道：

George Sakkis wrote:

我肯定一定有关于这个主题的过去主题，但我不知道如何找到它：如何
关于扩展for和; X>在"语法，以便X可以包含默认参数？这对于列表/生成器理解非常有用，例如能够写出如下内容：

[x * yz for（x，y，z = 0）in（1， 2,3），（4,5），（6,7,8）]

而不是不太优雅的显式循环版本，必须检查每个序列的长度。
您怎么看？

I''m sure there must have been a past thread about this topic but I don''t know how to find it: How
about extending the "for <X> in" syntax so that X can include default arguments ? This would be very
useful for list/generator comprehensions, for example being able to write something like:

[x*y-z for (x,y,z=0) in (1,2,3), (4,5), (6,7,8)]

instead of the less elegant explicit loop version that has to check for the length of each sequence.
What do you think ?

您是如何获得该格式的数据的？它看起来对我来说有点奇怪。

你收集数据而不是使用它时，填写默认值会不会更容易？


-

Ciao，

Matteo

How did you get the data in that format in the first place? It looks a
bit strange to me. Wouldn''t it be easier to fill in default values when
you gather data as opposed to when you use it?

--
Ciao,
Matteo

" Kay Schluehr" < KA ********** @ gmx.net>写道：

"Kay Schluehr" <ka**********@gmx.net> wrote:

George Sakkis写道：

George Sakkis wrote:

这对于列表/生成器理解非常有用，例如能够写一些类似：

This would be very
useful for list/generator comprehensions, for example being able to write something like:

[x * yz for（x，y，z = 0）in（1,2,3），（4,5），（6,7， 8）]

[x*y-z for (x,y,z=0) in (1,2,3), (4,5), (6,7,8)]

看起来非常吸引人，但是如何处理

[x * yz for（x = 0，y，z）in（1， 2,3），（4,5），（6,7,8）]？

由于模式不匹配会引发异常吗？

Looks very appealing, but what to do with

[x*y-z for (x=0,y,z) in (1,2,3), (4,5), (6,7,8)] ?

Should it raise an exception due to a pattern mismatch?

>
我没有想到将语法概括为比函数

签名更多，因此这将是语法错误：

SyntaxError ：关键字arg之后的非关键字arg

如果不是这里应该如何应用匹配规则？

[x * yz for（x = 0，y = 0，z = 0 ）（1,2,3），（4,5），（6,7,8）]
如果有疑问，请写一个关心正确填充的矢量类（
或更一般和几何mea ning：选择正确的超平面
并启用不同填充之间的切换。这个解决方案既灵活又可重复使用。

关心Kay

I didn''t have in mind to generalize the syntax even more than the respective for function
signatures, therefore this would be syntax error:
SyntaxError: non-keyword arg after keyword arg
If not how should matching rules apply here?

[x*y-z for (x=0,y=0,z=0) in (1,2,3), (4,5), (6,7,8)]

If in doubt write a vector class that cares about the correct padding (
or more general and with geometric meaning: select the right hyperplane
) and enable to switch between different paddings. This solution is
both flexible and reusable.

Regards Kay

这只是一个例子;我认为所建议的功能在处理几何或向量的情况下将比有用的更有用，所以我希望它能得到语言本身的支持。


问候，

乔治

This was just an example; I think the proposed functionality will be helpful in far more cases than
dealing with geometry or vectors, so I would prefer it to be supported by the language itself.

Regards,
George

这篇关于用于循环扩展语法的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！