comp.databases.ms访问 [英] comp.databases.ms-access

问题描述

Google网上论坛报告向CDMA发布的数字如下：


2001：136000

2002：148000

2003：103000

2004：45400

2005：35500

-------


查看过去几周的帖子我发现只有少数长期常客，

（David Fenton，Larry Linson，Steve Jorgensen，Rick Brandt，Tom Van

Stiphout ，Allan Browne。查克格里姆斯比），每个人只有几个帖子。

我对这些帖子进行了粗略的检查，所以如果我错过了

你，请原谅我。


-------


今天，在07:00，我发现只有五个活跃的线程

从午夜开始。


-------


评论？

您认为：

CDMA一般已经下降;

CDMA帖子的质量下降了（以及数量）;

MS-Access使用率正在下降;

MVP stat的潜在回报我们引诱了一些常客来到MS

团体;

围绕Access 2000，MVP和XMVP巨魔的争吵推动了

成员离开？

CDMA可以或将会恢复到之前的使用频率和高

状态吗？

Google Groups reports numbers postings to CDMA as follows:

2001: 136000
2002: 148000
2003: 103000
2004: 45400
2005: 35500

-------

Looking over last weeks postings I find only a few long-term regulars,
(David Fenton, Larry Linson, Steve Jorgensen, Rick Brandt, Tom Van
Stiphout, Allan Browne. Chuck Grimsby), and only a few posts from each.
I did a very cursory examination of these postings, so if I have missed
you, please forgive me.

-------

Today, at 07:00 I can find just five threads that have been active
since midnight.

-------

Comment?
Do you think:
CDMA, in general, has declined;
The quality of CDMA posts has declined, (as well as the number);
MS-Access use is declining;
The potential reward of MVP status has lured some of our regulars to MS
groups;
The acrimony surrounding Access 2000, MVPs and XMVP trolls drove
members away?
CDMA can or will return to its previous frequency of use and high
status?

推荐答案

2005年9月19日04:44:08 -0700，lylefair < LY ****** @ yahoo.ca>写道：

On 19 Sep 2005 04:44:08 -0700, "lylefair" <ly******@yahoo.ca> wrote:

Google网上论坛报告数字发布到CDMA如下：

2001：136000
2002：148000
2003：103000
2004：45400
2005：35500

-------

查看上周发布的文章，我发现只有少数长期常客，（David Fenton，Larry Linson，Steve Jorgensen，Rick Brandt，Tom Van
Stiphout，Allan Browne。Chuck Grimsby），每个帖子只有几个。
我做了一个非常粗略的检查这些帖子，所以如果我错过了你，请原谅我。

-------

今天，07：00我从午夜开始就可以找到五个活跃的线程。

-------

评论？
您认为：<一般来说，CDMA已经下降;
CDMA帖子的质量下降了（以及数量）;
MS-Access的使用正在下降;
MVP状态吸引了我们的一些常客到MS
团体;
围绕Access 2的争吵000，MVP和XMVP巨魔驱逐了成员吗？
CDMA可以或将会恢复到以前的使用频率和高状态吗？

Google Groups reports numbers postings to CDMA as follows:

2001: 136000
2002: 148000
2003: 103000
2004: 45400
2005: 35500

-------

Looking over last weeks postings I find only a few long-term regulars,
(David Fenton, Larry Linson, Steve Jorgensen, Rick Brandt, Tom Van
Stiphout, Allan Browne. Chuck Grimsby), and only a few posts from each.
I did a very cursory examination of these postings, so if I have missed
you, please forgive me.

-------

Today, at 07:00 I can find just five threads that have been active
since midnight.

-------

Comment?
Do you think:
CDMA, in general, has declined;
The quality of CDMA posts has declined, (as well as the number);
MS-Access use is declining;
The potential reward of MVP status has lured some of our regulars to MS
groups;
The acrimony surrounding Access 2000, MVPs and XMVP trolls drove
members away?
CDMA can or will return to its previous frequency of use and high
status?

1）（CDMA，一般情况下已经下降）编号

2）（CDMA帖子质量下降）编号

3）（MVP状态）没有。

4）（巨魔）是。

5）（回到以前的使用频率）也许吧。由于许多

用户要使用基于Web的应用程序，因此需要特定于Access的答案的人数将减少此处的流量。


虽然，不要忘记，因为我们都在这里回答问题，Goggle是

建立相当知识的答案！并且，正如我们经常提醒人们一样，Goggling提出一个问题通常是获得答案然后等待某人回答的更快的方式。


-

驱动器C：错误。 （A）bort（R）etry（S）mack The Darned Thing

1) (CDMA, in general, has declined) No.
2) (The quality of CDMA posts has declined) No.
3) (MVP status) No.
4) (trolls) Yes.
5) (return to its previous frequency of use) Maybe. Since a number of
users are going to Web-based applications, the number of people
needing Access-specific answers are going to reduce the traffic here.

Although, don''t forget that as we all answer questions here, Goggle is
building up quite the knowledge base of answers! And, as we often
remind people, Goggling a question is often a faster way to get an
answer then asking and waiting for someone to answer.

--
Drive C: Error. (A)bort (R)etry (S)mack The Darned Thing

Chuck Grimsby< c。******* @ worldnet。 att.net.invalid>写在

新闻：6o ******************************** @ 4ax.com：

Chuck Grimsby <c.*******@worldnet.att.net.invalid> wrote in
news:6o********************************@4ax.com:

1）（CDMA，一般来说，已经拒绝）


我会说它有。我使用xNews并选择我想要的某些海报

他们的帖子突出显示。这些帖子的数量远远低于以前的价格（而且这是因为那些已经改变了电子邮件地址的人已经发布了吗？我的得分文件还没有获得

。

2）（CDMA帖子质量下降）


我会说不。现在看来问题的质量现在更加严重地向新手倾斜了。


但我确实认为使用Access的人数较少它曾经是，但*曾经*使用它的人，甚至是最终的用户，比他们更加认真，比如5年之前。


这就是说，我现在的大部分工作都是为那些已经承诺使用Access的人提供支持。我没有为那些尚未使用Access数据库的
客户工作。

3）（MVP状态）


我认为这个是无关紧要的。在我看来，任何在MS新闻组中放弃这个群体的人都是疯了。我在这些新闻组中永远找不到任何东西，因为它们太过分手了。

能够告诉我在哪里发布特定问题。结果是如此多的碎片整体上特定主题的群体比这个综合群体更有帮助。

4）（巨魔） ）


我不知道这是否真的让任何人离开了，但是我不能说b
。

过去经常发帖的人很多都不在这里，因为他们的工作把他们带到了其他地方。

5）（返回到之前的使用频率）

1) (CDMA, in general, has declined)
I''d say it has. I use xNews and select certain posters who I want
their posts highlighted. The number of such posts is much lower than
it used to be (and that''s accounting for people who are still
posting who have changed email addresses that I haven''t yet gotten
into my scoring file).
2) (The quality of CDMA posts has declined)
I would say not. It seems the quality of questions is now more
severely skewed towards the novices, though.

But I do think that the number of people using Access is lower than
it once was, but that the people who *are* using it, even the end
users, are more serious about it than they were, say, 5 years ago.

That said, most of my work these days is in supporting people who''ve
already committed to using Access. I"m not picking up any work for
clients who don''t already use Access databases.
3) (MVP status)
I think this one is irrelevant. Anyone who abandons this group for
the MS newsgroups is insane, in my opinion. I can never find
anything in those newsgroups, as they are just way too broken up to
be able to tell where to post a specific question. The result is so
much fragmentation that overall the topic-specific groups are less
helpful than this one omnibus group.
4) (trolls)
I don''t know if this has actually driven anyone away, but I couldn''t
say.

A number of people who used to post regularly just aren''t here any
more because their work has taken them elsewhere.
5) (return to its previous frequency of use)

我对此表示怀疑。我认为Access正在逐渐下滑，因为我们知道它的产品。

这种下降始于1999年，随着A2K的发布，它已经明确表示微软关注更多了关于企业

市场比他们关心小企业。


-

David W. Fenton http://www.bway.net/~dfenton

dfenton at bway dot net http://www.bway.net/~dfassoc

2005年9月19日星期一20:48:09 -0500，David W. Fenton。 < DX ******** @ bway.net.invalid>写道：

On Mon, 19 Sep 2005 20:48:09 -0500, "David W. Fenton" <dX********@bway.net.invalid> wrote:

< big snip>在我看来，任何在MS新闻组中放弃这个群体的人都是疯了。我永远无法在这些新闻组中找到任何内容，因为它们太过分散，无法告诉在哪里发布特定问题。结果是如此多的碎片整体上，特定于主题的群体比这个综合群体更有帮助。

<big snip> Anyone who abandons this group for
the MS newsgroups is insane, in my opinion. I can never find
anything in those newsgroups, as they are just way too broken up to
be able to tell where to post a specific question. The result is so
much fragmentation that overall the topic-specific groups are less
helpful than this one omnibus group.

我可以保证这一点。它可以解释一些我们在这里稍微偏离主题的帖子，我不会介意的。

这个组的帖子比例非常高回答者，及时

。

I can vouch for that. It may explain some of the mildly off-topic posts we
get here, which I for one don''t mind.
This group has a VERY high proportion of posts answerer, and promptly
too.

这篇关于comp.databases.ms访问的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！