是否有人使用Python for .NET？ [英] Is anyone using Python for .NET?

问题描述

是否有人使用Python for .NET？我的意思是Brian在Zope的版本，

只是从Python以单向方式访问.NET。
http://www.zope.org/Members/Brian/PythonNet

不是实验性的ActiveState东西，试图编译IL和

显然没有成功。


问题的两个动机：


1）是否将它用于我的C ++ / C＃/ .NET / Python（？）游戏项目。这是原型的一部分，所以在这种情况下，主要是工作的β。是可以接受的我不需要准备黄金时间。还有一年。


2）此时是否可以将Python + .NET互操作作为

商业模式参考各种套装。我正在收集，因为Brian的网页上缺少了b $ b资源，而且他们的邮件列表上没有回复，

它不是。毕竟，西装需要感知支持。


所以我想知道谁在为Python的轮胎踢Python，因为那将是

使Python开发成为.NET友好议程的一部分。


为什么要有这个议程？好吧，微软通常会在每个人的营销中取得成功，所以如果你和他们在一起而不是反对他们，那么你有更好的机会获得你的广泛采用的技术。

此外，人们实际上喜欢.NET语言互操作，因为它的技术优点单独使用
。这是一个罕见的情况，微软实际上领先行业

而不是克隆和征服。克隆现在是Mono，在Unix

世界中。我希望最终，至少.NET的IL组件本身不是微软的东西。程序员需要简单的语言互操作解决方案。


-

干杯， www.indiegamedesign.com

Brandon Van每个西雅图，华盛顿州


布兰登的定律（在Godwin之后） 's law'：

随着Usenet讨论的延长，

a被称为巨魔的可能性接近一个人。

Is anyone using Python for .NET? I mean Brian''s version at Zope, which
simply accesses .NET in a one-way fashion from Python.
http://www.zope.org/Members/Brian/PythonNet
Not the experimental ActiveState stuff, which tried to compile IL and
apparently didn''t succeed.

Two motives for the question:

1) whether to use it for my C++ / C# / .NET / Python (?) game project. It''s
a prototype, so in this context a "mostly working beta" is acceptable. I
won''t need "ready for prime time" for another year yet.

2) whether it''s viable at this time to consult Python + .NET interop as a
business model to various Suits. I''m gathering that due to lack of
resources on Brian''s webpage, and lack of responses on their mailing list,
that it isn''t. Suits need to perceive support, after all.

So I''m wondering who''s kicking Python for .NET''s tires, as that would be
part of the agenda of getting Python development to be .NET friendly.

Why have that agenda? Well, Microsoft does generally succeed at
out-marketing everybody, so if you''re with them rather than against them,
you have a much better chance of having your technology widely adopted.
Also, people actually like .NET language interop for its technical merits
alone. It''s a rare case where Microsoft is actually leading the industry
rather than cloning and conquering. The clone is now Mono, in the Unix
world. I hope that eventually, at least the IL components of .NET are not a
Microsoft thing per se. Programmers need easy language interop solutions.

--
Cheers, www.indiegamedesign.com
Brandon Van Every Seattle, WA

Brandon''s Law (after Godwin''s Law):
"As a Usenet discussion grows longer, the probability of
a person being called a troll approaches one RAPIDLY."

推荐答案

我喜欢做的是使用.NET框架作为我的

的GUI引擎（仅限windows）申请。


这已经可以吗？

" Brandon J. Van Every" < TR *************************** @ yahoo.com>写在

消息新闻：br ************ @ ID-207230.news.uni-berlin.de ...

What I like to do is use the .NET framework as the GUI-engine for my
(windows only) applications.

Is this already possible?
"Brandon J. Van Every" <tr***************************@yahoo.com> wrote in
message news:br************@ID-207230.news.uni-berlin.de...

是有人使用Python for .NET吗？我的意思是Brian在Zope的版本，它只是从Python以单向方式访问.NET。
http://www.zope.org/Members/Brian/PythonNet
不是实验性的ActiveState东西，试图编译IL和<显然没有成功。

问题的两个动机：

1）是否将它用于我的C ++ / C＃/ .NET / Python（？ ）游戏项目。
这是一个原型，所以在这种情况下，主要是工作的β。是可以接受的我不需要为黄金时间准备好。还有一年了。

2）此时是否可以将Python + .NET interop作为各种套装的商业模式进行咨询。由于Brian的网页缺乏资源，而且他们的邮件列表没有回复，我正在收集，
它不是。毕竟，西装需要感知支持。

所以我想知道是谁在为Python推出Python的轮胎，因为那将是
的一部分议程。让Python开发变得非常友好。

为什么要有这个议程？好吧，微软通常会成功地推销每个人，所以如果你和他们在一起而不是反对他们，那么你有更好的机会让你的技术被广泛采用。
此外，人们实际上喜欢.NET语言互操作，仅凭其技术优势。这是一个罕见的情况，微软实际上是领导行业而不是克隆和征服。在Unix的世界里，克隆现在是Mono。我希望最终，至少.NET的IL组件本身不是微软的b $ b。程序员需要简单的语言互操作解决方案。

-
干杯， www .indiegamedesign.com
Brandon Van每个西雅图，华盛顿州

布兰登定律（遵循Godwin定律）：
作为Usenet的讨论一个人被称为巨魔的概率越来越长。

Is anyone using Python for .NET? I mean Brian''s version at Zope, which
simply accesses .NET in a one-way fashion from Python.
http://www.zope.org/Members/Brian/PythonNet
Not the experimental ActiveState stuff, which tried to compile IL and
apparently didn''t succeed.

Two motives for the question:

1) whether to use it for my C++ / C# / .NET / Python (?) game project. It''s a prototype, so in this context a "mostly working beta" is acceptable. I
won''t need "ready for prime time" for another year yet.

2) whether it''s viable at this time to consult Python + .NET interop as a
business model to various Suits. I''m gathering that due to lack of
resources on Brian''s webpage, and lack of responses on their mailing list,
that it isn''t. Suits need to perceive support, after all.

So I''m wondering who''s kicking Python for .NET''s tires, as that would be
part of the agenda of getting Python development to be .NET friendly.

Why have that agenda? Well, Microsoft does generally succeed at
out-marketing everybody, so if you''re with them rather than against them,
you have a much better chance of having your technology widely adopted.
Also, people actually like .NET language interop for its technical merits
alone. It''s a rare case where Microsoft is actually leading the industry
rather than cloning and conquering. The clone is now Mono, in the Unix
world. I hope that eventually, at least the IL components of .NET are not a Microsoft thing per se. Programmers need easy language interop solutions.

--
Cheers, www.indiegamedesign.com
Brandon Van Every Seattle, WA

Brandon''s Law (after Godwin''s Law):
"As a Usenet discussion grows longer, the probability of
a person being called a troll approaches one RAPIDLY."

" Brandon J. Van Every" < TR *************************** @ yahoo.com>在留言新闻中写道：< br ************ @ ID-207230.news.uni-berlin.de> ...

"Brandon J. Van Every" <tr***************************@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<br************@ID-207230.news.uni-berlin.de>...

这是一个罕见的案例微软实际上是领导这个行业的地方而不是克隆和征服。克隆现在是单声道，在Unix
世界。

It''s a rare case where Microsoft is actually leading the industry
rather than cloning and conquering. The clone is now Mono, in the Unix
world.

来自合同和互操作性 - 与安德斯的对话

Hejlsberg，第五部分 [1]：


Anders Hejlsberg，微软的杰出工程师，

带领设计C＃的团队（发音为C Sharp）
编程语言... 1996年，在Borland工作了13年之后，Hejlsberg加入了微软，他最初在那里担任
，担任Visual J ++的架构师。 ..


我不是Sun或Java的忠实粉丝，但这是相当一些行业

领导你正在展示我们，布兰登。 ;-)


Paul


[1] http://www.artima.com/intv/interop.html

Paul Boddie写道：

Paul Boddie wrote:

来自合同和互操作性 - 与Anders的对话

From "Contracts and Interoperability - A Conversation with Anders

Hejlsberg，第V部分 [1]：

Anders Hejlsberg，微软的杰出工程师，带领设计C＃（发音为C Sharp）编程语言的团队...... 1996年在Borland工作了13年之后，Hejlsberg加入了Microsoft，在那里他最初担任Visual J ++的架构师......

我不是很喜欢Sun或Java，但这是你向我们展示的一些行业领导者，Brandon。 ; - ）

Hejlsberg, Part V" [1]:

"Anders Hejlsberg, a distinguished engineer at Microsoft,
led the team that designed the C# (pronounced C Sharp)
programming language... In 1996, after 13 years with
Borland, Hejlsberg joined Microsoft, where he initially
worked as an architect of Visual J++..."

I''m no big fan of Sun or Java, but that''s quite some industry
leadership you''re showing us, Brandon. ;-)

eh？你是说所有Hejlsberg都知道编程语言

设计是他在开发Java时所采用的东西吗？


< / F>

eh? are you saying that all Hejlsberg knows about programming language
design is stuff he picked up while working on a Java implementation?

</F>

这篇关于是否有人使用Python for .NET？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！