终端服务器或运行时版本？ [英] Terminal Server or runtime version?
问题描述
新客户已经联系我整理。他们现有的
数据库。他们偶尔需要远程访问数据库，并使用终端服务器这样做。
。奇怪的是，所有本地
用户都使用TS来节省Access许可证！
两个问题：
如果20个人使用TS访问数据库，你需要每个用户获得一个访问许可证吗？
是否存在很大差异在这两个设置之间的性能：
1.前端和后端都安装在终端服务器上。
2.在Workstation上安装前端（使用Access运行时）后端安装了
在服务器上。
数据库有大约20个用户（5个，可能是10个并发）轻量级使用，
相当直接的crm系统。
谢谢，
Paul
I have been approached by a new customer to "sort-out" their existing
database. They occasionally need to remotely access the database and are
using Terminal Server to do so. The weird thing is that all of the local
users are using TS as well to save on Access licences!
Two questions:
If 20 people use TS to access a database do you need an Access licence for
each user?
Is there a big difference in performance between these two set-ups:
1. Frontend and Backend both installed on a Terminal Server.
2. Frontend installed on Workstation (with Access runtime) Backend installed
on server.
The database has around 20 users (5, maybe 10 concurrent) light usage,
fairly straight forward crm system.
Thanks,
Paul
推荐答案
Paul H写道：
Paul H wrote:
我被新客户接洽到整理他们现有的
数据库。他们偶尔需要远程访问数据库，并且
正在使用终端服务器这样做。奇怪的是，本地用户都使用TS来节省Access许可证！
两个问题：
如果20个人使用TS访问数据库，您是否需要为每个用户提供Access
许可证？
I have been approached by a new customer to "sort-out" their existing
database. They occasionally need to remotely access the database and
are using Terminal Server to do so. The weird thing is that all of
the local users are using TS as well to save on Access licences!
Two questions:
If 20 people use TS to access a database do you need an Access
licence for each user?
除非他们在TS上使用运行时，否则他们违反了
EULA。 TS不等于自由软件。
Unless they are using the runtime on the TS then they are violating the
EULA. TS does not equal "free software".
这两种设置之间的性能差异很大：
1.前端和后端都安装在终端服务器上。
2.安装在Workstation上的前端（使用Access运行时）后端
安装在服务器上。
Is there a big difference in performance between these two set-ups:
1. Frontend and Backend both installed on a Terminal Server.
2. Frontend installed on Workstation (with Access runtime) Backend
installed on server.
在局域网上，没有。在广域网上，第一个是实用的唯一选项
all。
-
Rick Brandt，Microsoft Access MVP
电子邮件（视情况而定）至...
在Hunter dot com的RBrandt
On a LAN, no. On a WAN the first is the only option that is practical at
all.
--
Rick Brandt, Microsoft Access MVP
Email (as appropriate) to...
RBrandt at Hunter dot com
" Paul H" < pa ** @ nospam.comwrote：
"Paul H" <pa**@nospam.comwrote:
>这两种设置之间的性能差异很大：
1。前端和后端都安装在终端服务器上。
2。在Workstation上安装了前端（使用Access运行时）后端安装在服务器上。
>Is there a big difference in performance between these two set-ups:
1. Frontend and Backend both installed on a Terminal Server.
2. Frontend installed on Workstation (with Access runtime) Backend installed
on server.
选项1会快得多。多快五倍。
Tony
-
Tony Toews，Microsoft Access MVP
请仅在新闻组中回复，以便其他人可以阅读整个邮件主题。
Microsoft Access Links，Hints，Tips&会计系统
http://www.granite.ab.ca /accsmstr.htm
我可以澄清一下....即使两个部分都在终端上
服务器，每个用户应该还有自己的前端副本，
对吗？我试图为客户第一次设置这个并且
我仍然在努力解决如何做通用的问题。前端设置。
谢谢。
Jan
Tony Toews [MVP]写道：
Can I just clarify on this....even when both parts are on the Terminal
Server, each user should still have their own copy of the front end,
right? I"m trying to set this up for the first time for a client and
I''m still struggling with how to do a "generic" front-end setup.
Thanks.
Jan
Tony Toews [MVP] wrote:
" Paul H" < pa ** @ nospam.comwrote：
"Paul H" <pa**@nospam.comwrote:
>这两种设置之间的性能差异很大：
1.前端和后端都安装在终端服务器上。 2.
安装在Workstation上的前端（使用Access运行时）后端安装在服务器上。
>Is there a big difference in performance between these two set-ups:
1. Frontend and Backend both installed on a Terminal Server. 2.
Frontend installed on Workstation (with Access runtime) Backend
installed on server.
选项1会快得多。多达五次
更快。
Tony
Option 1 would be substantially faster. As much as five times
faster.
Tony
这篇关于终端服务器或运行时版本？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
