谁控制了Access的改进 [英] Who controls improvements in Access
问题描述
我一直以为是那些会说话的人，那些写着Access的人，那就是大师。自称是真正的主人。
访问告诉MS他们想要什么。
一个低级的现实世界的开发人员，而不是一些谈论的主管专家
怎么样，有没有MS听到他们的声音？
多年前他们有类似心愿单的东西，但我一直以为
这几乎是一个圆形文件。
" Salad" < oi*@vinegar.com>写了
我一直以为会说话的人，编写Access
杂志的人，大师等。那些自称为真正的主人
访问告诉MS他们想要什么。
一个低级的现实世界的开发者，不是一些谈论的主管专家
搞砸了，有没有让MS听到他们的声音？
几年前他们有类似的愿望清单，但我一直认为这很漂亮很多圆形文件。
仅仅是为了记录，没有一个我认识的MVP，包括你真正的b $ b，你要么回答到大师也不是称自己为真正的主人
of Access。我们花了更多时间背对着墙壁。比一些
并自愿花时间和精力来帮助其他用户。我这样做是因为很多人多年来一直帮助我，而且他们大多数人都问过我是否会将b
传递给那些需要它的人帮助 - - 我还有很多b&b付款这样做。
微软也有一个MVP愿望清单，但每个愿望清单只有一个
的微软认为的众多信息来源对于多个版本的Access，它可能需要
即使是一个可接受的想法，也可以将它变成
产品。并且，很多建议都没有进入。坦白说，我怀疑从他们的大企业客户那里回来给他们的请求
通过他们的销售人员可能获得最受关注。
当我在一家创建和销售软件的大公司工作时（其中包括
其他东西），它有一个竞争分析部门 ;谁分析了b $ b b b竞争产品和客户在我们和他人的产品之间选择了b $ b的客户情况 - 我怀疑，但不知道，那个
Microsoft具有类似的功能。如果他们这样做，我们失去了这个出价的趋势
，因为竞争对手有'X'功能而我们没有会很快得到别人的关注。
Larry Linson
Microsoft Access MVP
" Larry Linson" <博***** @ localhost.not>在消息中写道
news：7x1se.5838
1q5.3779@trnddc02 ..." Salad" < oi*@vinegar.com>写了
我一直以为会说话的人，编写Access
杂志的人，大师等。那些自称为真正的主人
访问告诉MS他们想要什么。
一个低级的现实世界的开发者，不是一些谈论的主管专家
搞砸了，有没有让MS听到他们的声音？
几年前他们有类似的愿望清单，但我一直认为这很漂亮这是一个圆形的文件。
只是为了记录，没有一个我认识的MVP，包括你真正的MVP，要么回答guru，要么回答guru。也不是称自己为Access的真正主人。我们花了更多时间背对着墙壁。比一些人更愿意并自愿花时间和精力去帮助其他用户。我之所以这样做，是因为很多人多年来一直帮助我，而且他们大多数人都问我是否能帮助那些需要帮助的人 - 我有一个
很多还钱这样做。
微软也有一个MVP愿望清单，但每个愿望清单只是微软认为的众多信息来源中的一个，它可能是采取多个版本的Access，即使是一个公认的想法，也可以将其纳入
产品。并且，许多建议都没有进入。坦白说，我怀疑
通过他们的销售人员从他们的大企业客户
回来的请求可能会得到最受关注。
当我为一家创建和销售软件的大公司工作时（在其他事物中），它有一个竞争分析部门。谁分析了客户选择我们和他人产品之间的竞争产品和客户情况 - 我怀疑，但不知道，微软有类似的功能。如果他们这样做，我们失去了这个出价的趋势
因为竞争对手有'X'功能而我们没有很快就会得到别人的关注。
拉里·林森
微软Access MVP
多恩尼必须真的很无聊或完全疯狂地花费所有这些
时间试图冒充我。看到如何成为一名MVP和一名专业的开发人员，Donnie很难想象这是多么可怜的景象。虽然，我承认他似乎已经把我的
风格打得很好了。但这只是证明他在他的手上有太多时间，或者他再次离开他的药物。
I''ve always thought that the talking heads, the people that write Access
mags, the "gurus" that tout themselves as being the true masters of
Access tell MS what they want.
How does a lowly real-world developer, not some talking head pundit
touter, ever get MS to hear them?
Years ago they had something like a Wishlist, but I''ve always thought
that''s pretty much a circular file.
"Salad" <oi*@vinegar.com> wrote
I''ve always thought that the talking
heads, the people that write Access
mags, the "gurus" that tout themselves
as being the true masters of
Access tell MS what they want.
How does a lowly real-world developer,
not some talking head pundit
touter, ever get MS to hear them?
Years ago they had something like a
Wishlist, but I''ve always thought
that''s pretty much a circular file.
Just for the record, none of the MVPs with whom I am acquainted, including
yours truly, either answer to "guru" nor "tout ourselves as the true masters
of Access". We have "spent more time with our backs to the wall" than some
and volunteer our time and effort to assist other users. I do so because
many people helped me over the years and all most of them asked was that I
pass on the help to someone who needed it when I was able -- and I have a
lot of "paying back" that way to do.
Microsoft also has an MVP Wish list, but each of the wish lists are only one
of the many sources of information Microsoft considers, and it may take
multiple versions of Access for even an accepted idea to make it into the
product. And, many of the suggestions never make it in. I, frankly, suspect
that requests that come back to them from their larger enterprise customers
via their sales force probably gets the most attention.
When I worked for a large company that created and sold software (among
other things), it had a "competitive analysis department" who analyzed
competitive products and customer situations where the customer had chosen
between our and others'' products -- I suspect, but do not know, that
Microsoft has a similar function. If they do, a trend of "we lost that bid
because the competitor had function ''X'' and we do not" would get someone''s
attention rather quickly.
Larry Linson
Microsoft Access MVP
"Larry Linson" <bo*****@localhost.not> wrote in message
news:7x1se.5838
1q5.3779@trnddc02..."Salad" <oi*@vinegar.com> wroteI''ve always thought that the talking
heads, the people that write Access
mags, the "gurus" that tout themselves
as being the true masters of
Access tell MS what they want.
How does a lowly real-world developer,
not some talking head pundit
touter, ever get MS to hear them?
Years ago they had something like a
Wishlist, but I''ve always thought
that''s pretty much a circular file.
Just for the record, none of the MVPs with whom I am acquainted, including
yours truly, either answer to "guru" nor "tout ourselves as the true
masters
of Access". We have "spent more time with our backs to the wall" than some
and volunteer our time and effort to assist other users. I do so because
many people helped me over the years and all most of them asked was that I
pass on the help to someone who needed it when I was able -- and I have a
lot of "paying back" that way to do.
Microsoft also has an MVP Wish list, but each of the wish lists are only
one
of the many sources of information Microsoft considers, and it may take
multiple versions of Access for even an accepted idea to make it into the
product. And, many of the suggestions never make it in. I, frankly,
suspect
that requests that come back to them from their larger enterprise
customers
via their sales force probably gets the most attention.
When I worked for a large company that created and sold software (among
other things), it had a "competitive analysis department" who analyzed
competitive products and customer situations where the customer had chosen
between our and others'' products -- I suspect, but do not know, that
Microsoft has a similar function. If they do, a trend of "we lost that bid
because the competitor had function ''X'' and we do not" would get someone''s
attention rather quickly.
Larry Linson
Microsoft Access MVP
Well Donnie must be really bored or gone totally bonkers to spend all this
time trying to impersonate me. It''s indeed a pitiful sight to see how
Donnie struggles to imagine what it might be like to be an MVP and a
professional developer. Although, I will admit he seems to have gotten my
style down pretty well. But that just proves he has too much time on his
hands or he''s off his meds again.
这篇关于谁控制了Access的改进的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
