.Net与Java [英] .Net vs Java
问题描述
在广泛使用.Net和Java之后，这些是我的差异。
见：
Java没有有了Reflection.Emit
但它确实有反思。
到目前为止这没关系，因为大多数程序员都太笨了而无法使用
Reflection.Emit。
Visual Studio .net是创建Web服务的最简单方法。
Windows.Forms，而容易创建，无可救药地落后于其他工具包
如Swing和Gtk。
< blockquote> Moonraker写道：
在广泛使用.Net和Java之后，这些是我看到的差异：
Java没有Reflection.Emit
但它确实有反思。
到目前为止这没关系，因为大多数程序员都太愚蠢了，无法使用
Reflection.Emit。
你试过吗？ Mono作为.net的替代品？
从CD启动的200多个liveCD中的一些
并且无需安装即可运行单声道已经正常工作。
< a rel =nofollowhref =http://www.frozentech.com/content/livecd.phptarget =_ blank> http://www.frozentech.com/content/livecd.php
所有免费和完成技术的开源代码
配置和修改heart'的内容。
7写道：
你有没有尝试过Mono作为.net的替代品？
是的，我是单声道的忠实粉丝！
200张奇怪的liveCD，从CD启动并运行而无需安装单声道已经工作。
http：//www.frozentech。 com / content / livecd.php
所有免费和完成的技术与开源源代码
配置和修改heart'的内容。
我直接从源头获取我的信息：Suse。
有一个Red Carpet频道，因此可以轻松更新。
最近我对Glade中的UI开发很着迷 - 一种基于XML的
结构，用于定义可以使用mono / c＃操作的表单。它显然比AXML早了2年
。
>是的，我是单声道的忠实粉丝！
可能这回答了你的问题，很难与大/大粉丝争论。
但是从c＃（我从第一次测试以来使用它）转到java我没有看到任何与java有关的问题。
有些东西在java中更好，另外在.net中 - 它们都很大
NUT。
无论如何，一些蜜蜂会帮助解决它。
Moonraker < RO *** @ moore.bond.007>在消息中写道
新闻：是的****************** @ newsread1.news.pas.earth link.net ...
在广泛使用.Net和Java之后，这些是我看到的差异：
Java没有Reflection.Emit
但它确实如此有反思。
到目前为止这没关系，因为大多数程序员都太愚蠢无法使用
Reflection.Emit。
Visual Studio .net是最简单的创建Web服务的方法。
Windows.Forms虽然易于创建，却无可救药地落后于其他工具包，例如Swing和Gtk。
After working extensively with .Net and Java, these are the differences I
see:
Java does not have Reflection.Emit
But it does have Reflection.
That''s okay so far, because most programmers are too dumb to use
Reflection.Emit.
Visual Studio .net is the easiest way to create web services.
Windows.Forms, while easy to create, are hopelessly behind other toolkits
such as Swing and Gtk.
Moonraker wrote:
After working extensively with .Net and Java, these are the differences I
see:
Java does not have Reflection.Emit
But it does have Reflection.
That''s okay so far, because most programmers are too dumb to use
Reflection.Emit.
Visual Studio .net is the easiest way to create web services.
Windows.Forms, while easy to create, are hopelessly behind other toolkits
such as Swing and Gtk.
Have you tried Mono as replacement for .net?
Some of the 200 odd liveCDs that boot from CD
and run without having to install come with mono already working.
http://www.frozentech.com/content/livecd.php
All free and done up techies with open source source code
to configure and modify to heart''s content.
7 wrote:
Have you tried Mono as replacement for .net?
Yes, I am a huge fan of mono!
Some of the 200 odd liveCDs that boot from CD
and run without having to install come with mono already working.
http://www.frozentech.com/content/livecd.php
All free and done up techies with open source source code
to configure and modify to heart''s content.
I get mine straight from the source: Suse.
There is a Red Carpet channel so it can be easily updated.
Lately I''ve been fascinated with developing UIs in Glade -- an XML based
structure for defining forms that can operate with mono/c#. It''s
obviously 2 years ahead of AXML.
>Yes, I am a huge fan of mono!
Probably this answers your question, it''s hard to argue with big/huge fan.
But moving from c# (I used it from since first beta) to java I don''t see any
problems with java.
Some things are better in java, another in .net - they both are pretty big
NUT.
Anyway, some beeer would help to solve it.
"Moonraker" <ro***@moore.bond.007> wrote in message
news:Yp******************@newsread1.news.pas.earth link.net...
After working extensively with .Net and Java, these are the differences I
see:
Java does not have Reflection.Emit
But it does have Reflection.
That''s okay so far, because most programmers are too dumb to use
Reflection.Emit.
Visual Studio .net is the easiest way to create web services.
Windows.Forms, while easy to create, are hopelessly behind other toolkits
such as Swing and Gtk.
这篇关于.Net与Java的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
