ASP.NET over CGI的优点 [英] Benefits ASP.NET over CGI
问题描述
我需要创建一个小型的Web应用程序，并且正在考虑在ASP.NET中使用它来实现
。另一位开发人员（也是网络工程师）说它在他的IIS服务器上运行.NET是危险的。
他问我为什么不在CGI中这样做更快，并提供更多的灵活性。
我认为ASP.NET更快，但我不确定。有人可以给我
使用ASP.NET而不是CGI的具体好处（反之亦然）。
应用程序需要连接到SQL服务器并且有一些
组合框和网格。
-
亲切的问候，
Stijn Verrept。
Hi,
I need to make a small web-application and was thinking about doing it
in ASP.NET. Another developer (which is also network engineer) says it
is hazardous to run .NET on his IIS server.
He asks me why not do it in CGI which will be much faster and offers
more flexibility.
I thought ASP.NET was faster but I''m not sure. Can somebody give me
concrete benefits of using ASP.NET over CGI (and vice versa).
The application will need to connect to a SQL server and have some
comboboxes and a grid.
--
Kind regards,
Stijn Verrept.
推荐答案
CGI是一项较旧的技术。 CGI实际上是为网站制作
动态内容的第一种方式。 CGI应用程序有很多缺点
ISAPI / ASP.NET应用程序。速度/性能和可扩展性是ISAPI技术解决的CGI的主要问题。在ISAPI技术之上构建了一些
的框架。在其他
字中，主引擎是ISAPI。他们（仅举几例）
1. ASP
2，ASP.NET
3.冷融合
4. Java服务器页面（JSP）
他们都使用ISAPI引擎（而不是CGI）。
-
Shiv R. Kumar
http://www.matlus.com
CGI is an older technology. CGI was practically the first way to produce
dynamic content for websites. CGI applications have quite a few drawbacks
ISAPI/ASP.NET applications. Speed/Performance and scalability being the
primary issues with CGI that the ISAPI technology addresses. There are a
number of frameworks that are built on top of the ISAPI technology. In other
words the primary engine is an ISAPI. They are (to name a few)
1. ASP
2, ASP.NET
3. Cold Fusion
4. Java Server Pages (JSP)
They all use ISAPI engines (and not CGI).
--
Shiv R. Kumar
http://www.matlus.com
如果他认为运行ASP.NET有危险，那么他就不知道他在说什么了什么。
Stijn Verrept < stijn@no_s.p.a.n.entrysoft.com>在消息中写道
news：40 ********************* @ news.skynet.be ...
If he thinks its hazardous to run ASP.NET then he doesnt know what he is
talking about.
"Stijn Verrept" <stijn@no_s.p.a.n.entrysoft.com> wrote in message
news:40*********************@news.skynet.be...
我需要制作一个小型的Web应用程序，并且正在考虑在ASP.NET中执行它。另一位开发人员（也是网络工程师）说，在他的IIS服务器上运行.NET是危险的。
他问我为什么不在CGI中这样做会更快，并提供
更灵活。
我认为ASP.NET速度更快，但我不确定。有人可以给我带来使用ASP.NET而不是CGI的具体好处（反之亦然）。
应用程序需要连接到SQL服务器并有一些组合框和网格。 br />
-
亲切的问候，
Stijn Verrept。
Hi,
I need to make a small web-application and was thinking about doing it
in ASP.NET. Another developer (which is also network engineer) says it
is hazardous to run .NET on his IIS server.
He asks me why not do it in CGI which will be much faster and offers
more flexibility.
I thought ASP.NET was faster but I''m not sure. Can somebody give me
concrete benefits of using ASP.NET over CGI (and vice versa).
The application will need to connect to a SQL server and have some
comboboxes and a grid.
--
Kind regards,
Stijn Verrept.
Showjumper写道：
Showjumper wrote:
如果他认为运行ASP.NET有危险，那么他就不知道他在谈论什么。
If he thinks its hazardous to run ASP.NET then he doesnt know what he
is talking about.
也许但是那个这不是我的问题的答案。
-
亲切的问候，
Stijn Verrept。
Maybe but that''s not an answer to my question.
--
Kind regards,
Stijn Verrept.
这篇关于ASP.NET over CGI的优点的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
