呼吁参与：哪些类型的组织采用敏捷方法？ [英] Call for participation: What types of organisations adopt agile methods?
问题描述
在许多
组织的软件开发工作超过15年，使用不同的开发方法，如
瀑布，RUP，Scrum和XP，我还是不确定是否有一个特定的''类型'的组织更有可能采用敏捷
方法？
我想可以说，那些更具创新性或开放变革的组织更有可能采用敏捷方法吗？
试试并且获得了更多的理解，因为我对
软件开发方法充满热情，五年前我开始攻读博士学位（b-b）（兼职）来研究这个问题。我现在正处于这样的地步，我将进行一项简短的调查，以确定哪些因素可能会或可能不会因为采用敏捷方法而影响b
希望提供一些
的启示。如果我们得到足够的参与，那么我希望向团队报告
，看看是否确实存在任何趋势。
该调查很简短，应该花费大约5到10分钟才能完成，
所以请提出一些比例问题，要求您根据一系列陈述对您的协议进行评分。要参加，我可以请求b $ b请使用以下链接填写调查表 -
http://ou1211237011.agile-adoption.sgizmo.com
我相信如果我们能确定组织的特点
采用并且不采用敏捷方法，我们可以更好地了解某些组织是否更有利于采用？b $ b采用敏捷方法？
注意这不是营销调查，用于博士和实习生研究目的。所有的调查结果和结果将发布给小组，并严格保密地回复。
我的研究证据可以在这里找到：
http://www.computing.open.ac.uk/Publ...tion=computing
非常感谢您的参与。
Kindest问候
Ant Grinyer
----------
商业分析师|英国Cegedim制药解决方案
博士候选人|开放大学|英国米尔顿凯恩斯
Having worked in software development for over 15 years in many
organisations using different development methodologies such as
waterfall, RUP, Scrum and XP, I''m still not sure if there is a
specific ''type'' of organisation that is more likely to adopt agile
approaches than others?
I guess it could be argued that those organisations that are more
innovative or open to change are more likely to adopt agile methods?
To try and gain more understanding, and because I have a passion for
software development methodologies, I started a PhD five years ago
(part-time) to look at this issue. I''m now at the point where I''m
conducting a short survey to determine what factors might or might not
influence the adoption of agile methods, in the hope to provide some
enlightenment. If we get enough participation, I then hope to report
this back to the group to see if there are indeed any trends.
The survey is short and should take around 5 - 10 minutes to complete,
so please bare with the scaled questions whereby you are asked to rate
your agreement against a list of statements. To participate, could I
kindly ask you to fill in the survey using the link below -
http://ou1211237011.agile-adoption.sgizmo.com
I believe if we can determine the characteristics of organisations
that adopt and do not adopt agile methods, we can get a better
understanding whether certain organisations are more conducive to
adopting agile methods?
Note this is NOT a marketing survey and is used for doctoral and
practitioner research purposes. All findings and results will be
published to the group and responses treated in strict confidence.
Evidence of my research can be found here:
http://www.computing.open.ac.uk/Publ...tion=computing
Your participation is greatly appreciated.
Kindest Regards
Ant Grinyer
----------
Business Analyst | Cegedim Pharmaceutical Solutions, UK
PhD Candidate | The Open University | Milton Keynes, UK
推荐答案
7月10日晚上11点33分，a.grin ... @ sky.com（Ant Grinyer）写道：
On Jul 10, 11:33 pm, a.grin...@sky.com (Ant Grinyer) wrote:
在软件开发领域工作超过15年
许多组织使用不同的开发方法
如瀑布，RUP，Scrum和XP，我还不确定是否有一个特定的''类型'的组织更有可能采用敏捷的b $ b接近比其他人？
Having worked in software development for over 15 years in
many organisations using different development methodologies
such as waterfall, RUP, Scrum and XP, I''m still not sure if
there is a specific ''type'' of organisation that is more likely
to adopt agile approaches than others?
我想可以说，那些更具创新性或开放变革的组织更有可能采用
敏捷方法？
I guess it could be argued that those organisations that are
more innovative or open to change are more likely to adopt
agile methods?
可以很容易地认为这些组织关注的质量和稳健性要低得多。或者不必担心
预算。或者很容易被花哨的广告词吸收，
而不是实质。
敏捷编程，因此，并不意味着什么。它只是
a积极的嗡嗡声，任何人开发新的
方法都适用于使它听起来不错。
注意表达式瀑布方法。对任何明确的方法都不适用
。它与
敏捷编程正好相反，这是一个负面的嗡嗡声，适用于那些不会购买新方法的人。
>
两者都不对应任何单一的，明确定义的方法。
粗略地说：如果我这样做，那就是敏捷的编程，但是如果
别人这样做，它是瀑布。
-
James Kanze（GABI Software）电子邮件：ja ****** ***@gmail.com
Conseils eninformatiqueorientéeobjet/
Beratung in objektorientierter Datenverarbeitung
9placeSémard，78210 St.-Cyr -l''école，法国，+ 33（0）1 30 23 00 34
It could just as easily be argued that those organisations care
less about quality and robustness. Or don''t have to worry about
a budget. Or are easily taken in by fancy advertising words,
rather than substance.
"Agile programming", as such, doesn''t mean anything. It''s just
a positive sounding buzz word, which anyone developing a new
methodology applies to make it sound good.
Note that the expression "waterfall methodology" doesn''t apply
to any definite methodology either. It''s just the opposite of
agile programming, a negative sounding buzz word to apply to
those who don''t buy into your new methodology.
Neither correspond to any single, well defined methodology.
Roughly speaking: if I do it, it''s agile programming, but if
someone else does it, it''s waterfall.
--
James Kanze (GABI Software) email:ja*********@gmail.com
Conseils en informatique orientée objet/
Beratung in objektorientierter Datenverarbeitung
9 place Sémard, 78210 St.-Cyr-l''école, France, +33 (0)1 30 23 00 34
（Ant Grinyer）写道：
(Ant Grinyer) wrote:
>我想可以说，那些更具创新性或开放变革的组织更有可能采用敏捷方法？
>I guess it could be argued that those organisations that are
more innovative or open to change are more likely to adopt
agile methods?
James Kanze写道：
James Kanze wrote:
可以很容易地说这些组织护理
少关于质量和稳健性。或者不必担心
预算。或者很容易被花哨的广告词吸引，
而不是实质。
It could just as easily be argued that those organisations care
less about quality and robustness. Or don''t have to worry about
a budget. Or are easily taken in by fancy advertising words,
rather than substance.
这显示缺乏对b / b
敏捷编程的支持者正在推广的内容的研究或理解。
This shows a lack of research into or understanding of what the proponents of
agile programming are promoting.
敏捷编程，因此，并不意味着什么。它只是
一个积极的声音词，任何人开发新的
方法都适用于使它听起来不错。
"Agile programming", as such, doesn''t mean anything. It''s just
a positive sounding buzz word, which anyone developing a new
methodology applies to make it sound good.
再次，你无法理解人们在说什么。 敏捷
编程是用于软件项目管理的特定方法的标题。
Again, you have failed to understand what people are saying. "Agile
programming" is a rubric for a particular approach to software project management.
注意表达式瀑布方法。对任何明确的方法都不适用
。这只是
的反面
Note that the expression "waterfall methodology" doesn''t apply
to any definite methodology either. It''s just the opposite of
瀑布已经存在了将近五十年，足够长的时间让人们了解b
还有一套特定的开发原则。
这个词是宽泛的，是的，但不仅仅是
Waterfall has been around for almost fifty years, long enough for people to
understand that it refers also to a specific set of development principles.
The term is broad, yes, but not just
a负面的声音热门词汇适用于
那些没有购买新方法的人。
a negative sounding buzz word to apply to
those who don''t buy into your new methodology.
实际上，术语瀑布是指对于软件开发而言，早于你的新
方法论几十年来，因此在这个术语上归咎于敏捷编程世界是多么不诚实。
In fact, the term "waterfall" for software development predates "your new
methodology" by decades, so it is more than a little disingenuous to blame the
agile programming world for that term.
两者都不对应任何一个，定义良好的方法。
粗略地说：如果我这样做，那就是敏捷的编程，但是如果其他人做了b $ b，那就是瀑布。
Neither correspond to any single, well defined methodology.
Roughly speaking: if I do it, it''s agile programming, but if
someone else does it, it''s waterfall.
这是不准确的。对于那些想要了解的人，谷歌搜索将揭示真相。
就像任何这样的事情，当然，有很多B.S.围绕敏捷
和其他方法。这并不能使詹姆斯坎泽的修正主义者定义更准确。
-
Lew
That is inaccurate. For those who want to know, googling will reveal the truth.
Like any such thing, of course, there is an awful lot of B.S. around "agile"
and other methodologies. That doesn''t make James Kanze''s revisionist
definitions any more accurate.
--
Lew
Ant Grinyer写道：
Ant Grinyer wrote:
在软件开发方面工作超过15年
组织使用不同的开发方法，比如
瀑布，RUP，Scrum和XP，我还不确定是否有特定的''b'类型''类型''更有可能采用敏捷的组织比其他人采用的方法更好吗？
我想可以说那些组织更多的是
创新或开放变革更有可能采用敏捷方法？
Having worked in software development for over 15 years in many
organisations using different development methodologies such as
waterfall, RUP, Scrum and XP, I''m still not sure if there is a
specific ''type'' of organisation that is more likely to adopt agile
approaches than others?
I guess it could be argued that those organisations that are more
innovative or open to change are more likely to adopt agile methods?
当然应该选择适合项目的方法，而不是固定
的组织。我知道我使用不同的方法
取决于我在做什么。
也许一个不采用敏捷方法的组织只是在做一个
他们不适合的很多项目。
Patricia
Surely the methodology should be chosen to fit the project, not fixed
for the organization. I know that I use different methodologies
depending on what I am doing.
Maybe an organization that does not adopt agile methods is just doing a
lot of projects they do not suit.
Patricia
这篇关于呼吁参与：哪些类型的组织采用敏捷方法？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
