为什么Java Fail和C ++会上升 [英] Why Java Fail and C++ rise

问题描述

大家好，


我见过很多论坛都在争夺这两种语言。


缺点


1）当一个完整的java应用程序被编写并且必须打包时，整个JRE必须打包它。因为使用了特定的

JRE版本，所以整个JRE和java应用程序都需要

来部署。

也可以假设最终用户可能正在使用Java应用程序

来解决他/她的日常问题但是当用户拥有一个小的硬盘驱动器容量JAVA FAILS很大时候。 />
如果你看看所有专业的Java应用程序，那些公司就会部署他们的产品，但他们也部署了公司用来开发应用程序的JRE
。这将需要一个版本控制

锁定，这会增加java产品。

使用JAVA会导致更高的硬盘空间消耗，更多

内存和更多CPU功率。

由于这个硬件，普通终端用户不鼓励使用

Java应用程序。


我必须说如果我创建一个OOP对象，我应该能够在销毁一个对象时指定

。

漂亮很多DMD编译器。


除了指针外，还有C ++规则。

FireHead

解决方案

在2007-09-26 12:37， fi ***** ********@gmail.com 写道：

Hello All，


I已经看过很多论坛都在争夺这两种语言。


缺点


1）当编写完整的java应用程序时一世t必须是打包的，然后整个JRE必须与它一起打包。因为使用了特定的

JRE版本，所以整个JRE和java应用程序都需要

来部署。

也可以假设最终用户可能正在使用Java应用程序

来解决他/她的日常问题但是当用户拥有一个小的硬盘驱动器容量JAVA FAILS很大时候。 />
如果你看看所有专业的Java应用程序，那些公司就会部署他们的产品，但他们也部署了公司用来开发应用程序的JRE
。这将需要一个版本控制

锁定，这会增加java产品。

使用JAVA会导致更高的硬盘空间消耗，更多

内存和更多CPU功率。

由于这个硬件，普通终端用户不鼓励使用

Java应用程序。


我必须说如果我创建一个OOP对象，我应该能够在销毁一个对象时指定

。

漂亮很多DMD编译器。


除了指针外，还有C ++规则。

除了向合唱团讲道之外，你有什么想要的C ++问题

回答了吗？


-

Erik Wikstr ?? m

你好，

fi ************* @ gmail.com 写道：

>

缺点


1）当编写完整的java应用程序并且必须

打包然后整个JRE必须打包它。

>

我必须说如果我创建一个OOP对象我应该可以指定
当一个对象被破坏时，
。

几乎是DMD编译器。

>

除了指针外，还有C ++规则。

只列举几个部分，其中Java和/或
C ++的常见实现有弱点或者语言的功能很容易

滥用是不足以得出任何结论。即使完成

两种语言的相应列表也不会发生太大变化。

>


FireHead

Nomen est omen。


Bernd Strieder

fi ************* @gmail。 com 写道：

Hello All，


我见过很多论坛都在讨论这些问题2种语言。

我们在这里不需要再打架了。



Brian

Hello All,

I have seen a lot of forums that are fight over these 2 languages.

Disadvantages

1) When a complete java application has been written and it has to be
packaged then entire JRE has to packaged with it. Because a particular
JRE version is used therefore the entire JRE and java application has
to deployed in conjuction.
Also it can be assumed that end-user might be using a Java application
to solve his/her daily problems BUT when the users have a small hard-
drive capacity JAVA FAILS big time.
If you look at all professional Java applications, the companies
deploy their products but they also deploy JRE that the company has
used to develop the application. This would have to a version control
lock-in, which inturn the increase of java products.
Using JAVA it will lead a higher consumption of hard-drive space, more
RAM and more CPU power.
Because of this hardware common-end user will be discourage to use
Java applications.

I must say that if I create an OOP object I should be able to specify
when the destruction of a object should occur.
Pretty much DMD compiler.

Besides pointers C++ rules hand down.
FireHead

解决方案

On 2007-09-26 12:37, fi*************@gmail.com wrote:

Hello All,

I have seen a lot of forums that are fight over these 2 languages.

Disadvantages

1) When a complete java application has been written and it has to be
packaged then entire JRE has to packaged with it. Because a particular
JRE version is used therefore the entire JRE and java application has
to deployed in conjuction.
Also it can be assumed that end-user might be using a Java application
to solve his/her daily problems BUT when the users have a small hard-
drive capacity JAVA FAILS big time.
If you look at all professional Java applications, the companies
deploy their products but they also deploy JRE that the company has
used to develop the application. This would have to a version control
lock-in, which inturn the increase of java products.
Using JAVA it will lead a higher consumption of hard-drive space, more
RAM and more CPU power.
Because of this hardware common-end user will be discourage to use
Java applications.

I must say that if I create an OOP object I should be able to specify
when the destruction of a object should occur.
Pretty much DMD compiler.

Besides pointers C++ rules hand down.

Besides preaching to the choir, do you have any C++ question you want
answered?

--
Erik Wikstr??m

Hello,

fi*************@gmail.com wrote:

>
Disadvantages

1) When a complete java application has been written and it has to be
packaged then entire JRE has to packaged with it.

>
I must say that if I create an OOP object I should be able to specify
when the destruction of a object should occur.
Pretty much DMD compiler.

>
Besides pointers C++ rules hand down.

Just enumerating a few parts where common implementations of Java and
C++ have weaknesses or where features of the languages are easily
abused is not enough to conclude anything. Even completing the
respective lists for both languages will not change a lot.

>

FireHead

Nomen est omen.

Bernd Strieder

fi*************@gmail.com wrote:

Hello All,

I have seen a lot of forums that are fight over these 2 languages.

And we don''t need another fight here.


Brian

这篇关于为什么Java Fail和C ++会上升的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！