VC ++与C ++ [英] VC++ vs C++

问题描述

我在哪里可以找到一份文件，概述

Microsoft的Visual C ++和ANSI C ++之间的主要区别？

谢谢，


Marco

解决方案

Marco写道：

我在哪里可以找到一份文件，概述了 Microsoft的Visual C ++和ANSI C ++？

您应该在microsoft.public.vc.language中询问。他们知道

所有具体内容使得当前的VC ++编译器仍然没有完全符合标准。


AFAIK，它但是，非常接近。像98％的东西。我已经读过了

某处。


Victor

它说的是什么1997年的ISO C ++标准，即2004年，b $ b可以说是主流的C ++编译器，Microsoft Visual C ++没有完全实现该语言的b $ b？这主要是由于标准的复杂性或者微软对标准的优先级是否较低？

合规性？我已经读过g ++越来越慢，因为ISO C ++功能正在添加
。


Victor Bazarov< v。******** @ comAcast.net>在消息新闻中写道：< hk **************** @ dfw-read.news.verio.net> ...

Marco写道：< blockquote class =post_quotes>我在哪里可以找到一份文档，概述了Microsoft的Visual C ++和ANSI C ++之间的主要区别？

你可能应该在microsoft中询问.public.vc.language。他们知道有关当前VC ++编译器仍然不能完全符合标准的所有细节。

AFAIK，它非常接近。像98％的东西。我已经在某处读过了它。

Victor

是******* @ aol.com 写道：

它对2004年的ISO C ++标准有什么看法，可以说是主流的C ++编译器，Microsoft Visual C ++没有完全实现该语言？这主要是由于标准的复杂性还是微软对标准的合规性给予了较低的优先级？我已经读过，随着ISO C ++功能的添加，g ++变得越来越慢。


请不要顶一下。如果你不认为谈话达到

，当你回复它时，是相关的，不要引用它。

如果你认为报价是必要的，把你的文字_后_引用。

谢谢。


现在，关于标准合规性，微软有几个领域

他们仍然不合规，而且这些列在

http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en...sInVisualC.asp


请自己阅读并自行决定是否因为Microsoft

实现者懒惰或太忙而无法实现所有内容。


至于G ++，就我而言，它现在是一个二级编译器。

它曾经是好的，但不再是。主要原因是参与开发商的动机

（或者说缺乏）。


V

Victor Bazarov< v ******** @ comAcast.net>在消息新闻中写道：< hk **************** @ dfw-read.news.verio.net> ...

Marco写道：

我在哪里可以找到一份文档，概述了Microsoft的Visual C ++和ANSI C ++之间的主要区别？

AFAIK，它非常接近。像98％的东西。我已经在某个地方读到了它。

Victor

Where can I find a document outlining the main differences between
Microsoft''s Visual C++ and ANSI C++?
Thanks,

Marco

解决方案

Marco wrote:

Where can I find a document outlining the main differences between
Microsoft''s Visual C++ and ANSI C++?

You should probably ask in microsoft.public.vc.language. They know
all the specifics on what makes current VC++ compiler still not
perfectly compliant with the Standard.

AFAIK, it''s very close, though. Something like 98%. I''ve read it
somewhere.

Victor

What does it say about the 1997 ISO C++ standard that in 2004,
arguably the dominant C++ compiler, Microsoft Visual C++ does not
fully implement the language? Is this primarily due to the complexity
of the standard or Microsoft''s placing a lower priority on standards
compliance? I have read that g++ is getting slower as ISO C++ features
are being added.

Victor Bazarov <v.********@comAcast.net> wrote in message news:<hk****************@dfw-read.news.verio.net>...

Marco wrote:

Where can I find a document outlining the main differences between
Microsoft''s Visual C++ and ANSI C++?

You should probably ask in microsoft.public.vc.language. They know
all the specifics on what makes current VC++ compiler still not
perfectly compliant with the Standard.

AFAIK, it''s very close, though. Something like 98%. I''ve read it
somewhere.

Victor

be*******@aol.com wrote:

What does it say about the 1997 ISO C++ standard that in 2004,
arguably the dominant C++ compiler, Microsoft Visual C++ does not
fully implement the language? Is this primarily due to the complexity
of the standard or Microsoft''s placing a lower priority on standards
compliance? I have read that g++ is getting slower as ISO C++ features
are being added.
Please don''t top-post. If you don''t think the conversation up to
the point when you''re replying to it, is relevant, don''t quote it.
If you think the quote is needed, put your text _after_ the quote.
Thank you.

Now, regarding the Standard-compliance, Microsoft has a few areas
that they are still non-compliant, and those are listed in

http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en...sInVisualC.asp

Please read and decide to yourself whether it''s because Microsoft
implementors are lazy or too busy to implement everything.

As for G++, it''s now a second-grade compiler, as far as I''m concerned.
It used to be good, but not any more. The main reason is motivation
(or rather lack thereof) of the participating developers.

V

Victor Bazarov <v.********@comAcast.net> wrote in message news:<hk****************@dfw-read.news.verio.net>...

Marco wrote:

Where can I find a document outlining the main differences between
Microsoft''s Visual C++ and ANSI C++?

You should probably ask in microsoft.public.vc.language. They know
all the specifics on what makes current VC++ compiler still not
perfectly compliant with the Standard.

AFAIK, it''s very close, though. Something like 98%. I''ve read it
somewhere.

Victor

这篇关于VC ++与C ++的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！