新的ASP.NET 2.0术语：“CROSSPOST”是一个非常不好用的名字 [英] New ASP.NET 2.0 Terminology: "CROSSPOST" is a very BAD name to use

问题描述

亲爱的微软：


在你的新的ASP.NET 2.0页面模型中，能够交叉到另一个页面，这似乎是你的在Google中输入该字词，

" crosspost"或者交叉发布，你会得到无数的结果来自

新闻组警察抱怨海报交叉发布到许多新闻组

正如这条消息所做的那样。 br />

所以对于那些在微软的人来说，并且因为将你的表单结果发布到另一个

页面在网站上是非常重要的，并且可能是一个很重要的部分

为什么.NET如此困难，我建议你找一个比交叉

post更好的名字。


否则，当你这样做谷歌或雅虎搜索交叉发布时当

试图学习如何发布到另一个页面时，你将获得无穷无尽的结果

来自新闻组警察。新闻组警察没有松懈

抱怨交叉发布，所以没想到什么时候ASP.NET出来

谷歌或其他什么都可以告诉作为交叉

发布的差异投诉永无止境，永远是最新的。如果你在新闻组或网站上这样做，你也会得到相同的礼仪投诉

或网页。


你，微软，基本上选择与警察在投诉中所做的完全相同的名字，只会让人们更加困惑。


也许，你应该使用Post Post

名称的内容....如何发布前进？或类似的东西......但肯定是

不是单词，cross post。

Dear Microsoft:

In your new ASP.NET 2.0 page model of being able to crosspost to another
page, it would seem that if you were to type that word in Google,
"crosspost" or "cross post", you will get endless amount of results from the
newsgroup police complaining about posters cross posting to many newsgroups
as this very message is doing.

So to those at Microsoft, and since posting your form results to another
page is very very important in a web site, and probably a big big part of
why .NET is so difficult, I recommend you find a better name than "cross
post".

Otherwise, when you do that Google or Yahoo search for "cross post" when
trying to learn how to post to another page, you will get endless results
from the newsgroup police. There is no let up in the newsgroup police
complaining about cross posting, so don''t think when ASP.NET comes out
Google or whatever will be able to tell the difference as the "cross
posting" complaints are never ending and are always current. If you do that
in newsgroups or in the Web, you will also get the same etiquette complaints
or web pages as well.

You, Microsoft, are essentially choosing the exact same name as the
newgroups police do in their complaints and will only confuse people more.

Perhaps, you should using something on the lines of the "Post Back"
name....how about "Post Forward"? or something of the like...but definately
NOT the word, "cross post".

推荐答案

I我必须同意这个措辞没有经过深思熟虑。

-

<％= Clinton Gallagher

A / E / C咨询，网页设计，电子商务软件开发

Wauwatosa，密尔沃基县，美国威斯康星州

NET cs ********* @ REMOVETHISTEXTmetromilwaukee.com

URL http://www.metromilwaukee.com/clintongallagher/

" anon" <一个** @ hotmail.com>在消息中写道

news：ei ************** @ TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl ...

I have to agree that verbiage is not well thought out.
--
<%= Clinton Gallagher
A/E/C Consulting, Web Design, e-Commerce Software Development
Wauwatosa, Milwaukee County, Wisconsin USA
NET cs*********@REMOVETHISTEXTmetromilwaukee.com
URL http://www.metromilwaukee.com/clintongallagher/

"anon" <an**@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:ei**************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...

亲爱的微软：新闻组警察抱怨海报交叉发布到许多
新闻组，正如这个消息正在做的那样。

所以那些在微软的人，并且因为将你的表单结果发布到另一页
页面在网站上是非常非常重要的，并且可能是.NET如此困难的重要部分，我建议你找一个比交叉
帖子更好的名称。

否则，当你这样做时，谷歌或雅虎会搜索交叉发布。当
试图学习如何发布到另一个页面时，你将从新闻组警察那里得到无穷无尽的结果。新闻组警察没有松懈抱怨交叉发布，所以不要想当ASP.NET出来时谷歌或其他什么能够分辨出十字架发布"投诉永无止境，永远是最新的。如果你在新闻组或网站上做
，你也会得到相同的礼仪
投诉或网页。

你，微软，基本上是选择确切的警察在他们的投诉中所起的相同的名称，只会让人们更加困惑。

也许，你应该使用Post Post这个名字的名字来命名
....如何发布前进？或类似的东西......但是
肯定不是单词，cross post。

Dear Microsoft:

In your new ASP.NET 2.0 page model of being able to crosspost to another
page, it would seem that if you were to type that word in Google,
"crosspost" or "cross post", you will get endless amount of results from the newsgroup police complaining about posters cross posting to many newsgroups as this very message is doing.

So to those at Microsoft, and since posting your form results to another
page is very very important in a web site, and probably a big big part of
why .NET is so difficult, I recommend you find a better name than "cross
post".

Otherwise, when you do that Google or Yahoo search for "cross post" when
trying to learn how to post to another page, you will get endless results
from the newsgroup police. There is no let up in the newsgroup police
complaining about cross posting, so don''t think when ASP.NET comes out
Google or whatever will be able to tell the difference as the "cross
posting" complaints are never ending and are always current. If you do that in newsgroups or in the Web, you will also get the same etiquette complaints or web pages as well.

You, Microsoft, are essentially choosing the exact same name as the
newgroups police do in their complaints and will only confuse people more.

Perhaps, you should using something on the lines of the "Post Back"
name....how about "Post Forward"? or something of the like...but definately NOT the word, "cross post".

*"匿名" <一个** @ hotmail.com> scripsit：


请仅在页面中包含与主题相关的组。

在您的情况下，'恕我直言，只有ASP.NET组（也许是

whidbey组中的一个）。

* "anon" <an**@hotmail.com> scripsit:

Please only include groups in your page which are related to the topic.
In your case that''s IMHO only the ASP.NET group (and maybe one of the
whidbey groups).

在你的新的ASP.NET 2.0页面模型中能够交叉到另一个
如果您要在Google中输入该字词，那么/ crosspost就会显示出来。或者交叉发布，你会得到无数的结果来自
新闻组警察抱怨海报交叉发布到许多新闻组
正如这个消息正在做的那样。

所以那些在微软的人，并且因为将你的表单结果发布到另一页
页面在网站上是非常非常重要的，并且可能是.NET如此困难的重要部分，我建议你找一个比交叉
帖子更好的名字。


我没有看到问题。例如，在许多其他情况下（例如，自然语言）使用VB.NET关键字If，

，如果你将
输入谷歌，你会在前几次点击中找到很多信息，但不会在VB.NET中找到''如果......那么'的文件。

否则，当你这样做谷歌或雅虎搜索交叉发布时当
试图学习如何发布到另一个页面时，你将从新闻组警察那里得到无穷无尽的结果。


什么是新闻组警察？

你，微软，基本上选择与警察在他们的投诉中所做的完全相同的名字并且只会让人们更加困惑。

In your new ASP.NET 2.0 page model of being able to crosspost to another
page, it would seem that if you were to type that word in Google,
"crosspost" or "cross post", you will get endless amount of results from the
newsgroup police complaining about posters cross posting to many newsgroups
as this very message is doing.

So to those at Microsoft, and since posting your form results to another
page is very very important in a web site, and probably a big big part of
why .NET is so difficult, I recommend you find a better name than "cross
post".
I don''t see the problem. The VB.NET keyword "If", for example, is used
in many other circumstances (for example, natural language) too, if you
enter it into Google, you will find a lot of information, but not the
documentation for ''If...Then'' in VB.NET in the first few hits.
Otherwise, when you do that Google or Yahoo search for "cross post" when
trying to learn how to post to another page, you will get endless results
from the newsgroup police.
What''s newsgroup police?
You, Microsoft, are essentially choosing the exact same name as the
newgroups police do in their complaints and will only confuse people more.

如上所述，很多单词/关键字在他们的

意义上超载。


-

Herfried K. Wagner [MVP]

< http://www.mvps.org/dotnet>

As mentioned above, a lot of words/keywords are overloaded in their
meaning.

--
Herfried K. Wagner [MVP]
<http://www.mvps.org/dotnet>

不要过帖到这么多团体！ （oops，添加到FUD中）; - >


虽然这个想法当然有价值，但考虑过滤到ASP.NET组

你会比单独的dotnet获得更少的响应。使用内置的crud很难去ASP.NET中的另一个页面......直到Whidbey。你可以

仍然使用与旧ASP相同的方法（即从Response

对象中提取），但是你会失去一些好处。 ViewState是另一个

的可能性，因为它被传递到新页面。观看ViewStateMac

设置，因为它必须遵循精确编码，否则你会得到ViewState

损坏。


注意：是的，这很痛苦。在惠德贝（Whidbey）好多了。


-

Gregory A. Beamer

MVP; MCP：+ I，SE，SD，DBA


**************************** ********************** ********************

在盒子外面思考！

************************************* ************* ********************

anon <一个** @ hotmail.com>在消息中写道

news：ei ************** @ TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl ...

Don''t cross post to so many groups! (oops, added to the FUD) ;->

While the idea certainly has merit, consider filtering to the ASP.NET group
and you will get fewer responses than dotnet alone. It is difficult to go to
another page in ASP.NET using the built in crud ... until Whidbey. You can
still use the same methodology as old ASP (ie, pull from the Response
object), but you lose some of the benefits. ViewState is another
possibility, as it is passed to the new page. Watch the ViewStateMac
settings, as it has to follow exact encoding, or you will get ViewState
corrupt.

NOTE: Yes, it is a pain. Much better in Whidbey.

--
Gregory A. Beamer
MVP; MCP: +I, SE, SD, DBA

************************************************** ********************
Think Outside the Box!
************************************************** ********************
"anon" <an**@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:ei**************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...

亲爱的微软：新闻组警察抱怨海报交叉发布到许多
新闻组，正如这个消息正在做的那样。

所以那些在微软的人，并且因为将你的表单结果发布到另一页
页面在网站上是非常非常重要的，并且可能是.NET如此困难的重要部分，我建议你找一个比交叉
帖子更好的名称。

否则，当你这样做时，谷歌或雅虎会搜索交叉发布。当
试图学习如何发布到另一个页面时，你将从新闻组警察那里得到无穷无尽的结果。新闻组警察没有松懈抱怨交叉发布，所以不要想当ASP.NET出来时谷歌或其他什么能够分辨出十字架发布"投诉永无止境，永远是最新的。如果你在新闻组或网站上做
，你也会得到相同的礼仪
投诉或网页。

你，微软，基本上是选择确切的警察在他们的投诉中所起的相同的名称，只会让人们更加困惑。

也许，你应该使用Post Post这个名字的名字来命名
....如何发布前进？或类似的东西......但是
肯定不是单词，cross post。

Dear Microsoft:

In your new ASP.NET 2.0 page model of being able to crosspost to another
page, it would seem that if you were to type that word in Google,
"crosspost" or "cross post", you will get endless amount of results from the newsgroup police complaining about posters cross posting to many newsgroups as this very message is doing.

So to those at Microsoft, and since posting your form results to another
page is very very important in a web site, and probably a big big part of
why .NET is so difficult, I recommend you find a better name than "cross
post".

Otherwise, when you do that Google or Yahoo search for "cross post" when
trying to learn how to post to another page, you will get endless results
from the newsgroup police. There is no let up in the newsgroup police
complaining about cross posting, so don''t think when ASP.NET comes out
Google or whatever will be able to tell the difference as the "cross
posting" complaints are never ending and are always current. If you do that in newsgroups or in the Web, you will also get the same etiquette complaints or web pages as well.

You, Microsoft, are essentially choosing the exact same name as the
newgroups police do in their complaints and will only confuse people more.

Perhaps, you should using something on the lines of the "Post Back"
name....how about "Post Forward"? or something of the like...but definately NOT the word, "cross post".

这篇关于新的ASP.NET 2.0术语：“CROSSPOST”是一个非常不好用的名字的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！