重新思考Python教程 [英] Rethinking the Python tutorial

问题描述

虽然正式的Python教程已经很好地实现了它的b / b $ b目的，但保持最新状态几乎没有任何优先权，而且还有其他人热情地

在网上创建非常好的Python教程。


我认为Swaroop CH的''Byte of Python''很好

初学者教程，以及''潜入Python''由Mark

Pilgrim是一个很好的教程，对于经验丰富的

程序员来说。


我的根本想法是，我们在下面的镜像中反映了这些内容，以及

只需从Python中删除旧教程

2.5（或2.6？）docs。将这两个好的文本作为Python教程给予

官方状态。


正如我们想要采用最好的软件包一样

对于标准库，我认为我们应该使用

最好的文档，而且我认为还有

少了教程后向兼容性问题

而不是图书馆。 :)


我认为这个改变会给我们提供更好的文件，因为它可以减轻维护负担。如果有一天

来的时候Mark Pilgrim或Swaroop CH不想要

维护这些文本，我强烈怀疑

有其他教程我们可以用

替换它们，如果没有其他人介入以保持它们是最新的。

While the official Python Tutorial has served its
purpose well, keeping it up to date is hardly anyones
top priority, and there are others who passionately
create really good Python tutorials on the web.

I think ''A Byte of Python'' by Swaroop C H is a good
beginners tutorial, and ''Dive Into Python'' by Mark
Pilgrim is a good tutorial for more experienced
programmers.

My radical idea is that we mirror these at
diveinto.python.org and byteof.python.org, and
simply remove the old tutorial from the Python
2.5 (or 2.6?) docs. Give these two good texts an
official status as the Python tutorials.

Just as we want to adopt best of breed packages
for the standard library, I think we should use
best of breed documentation, and I think there are
less backward compatibility issues with tutorials
than with libraries. :)

I think this change would give us better docs as
well as a smaller maintenance burden. If a day
comes when Mark Pilgrim or Swaroop C H don''t want
to maintain these texts, I strongly suspect that
there are other tutorials we can replace them with
if noone else steps in to keep them up to date.

推荐答案

09 / 02/06，Magnus Lycka< ly *** @ carmen.se>写道：

On 09/02/06, Magnus Lycka <ly***@carmen.se> wrote:

虽然正式的Python教程已经很好地实现了它的目的，但保持它的最新状态几乎没有任何人的优先权，还有其他人热情地
在网上创建非常好的Python教程。

我认为Swaroop CH的''Byte of Python''是一个很好的初学者教程，并且''潜入Python''由Mark
Pilgrim对于经验丰富的程序员来说是一个很好的教程。

我的激进想法是我们在/ devinto.python.org和byteof.python.org上反映这些内容。 ，并简单地从Python
2.5（或2.6？）文档中删除旧教程。将这两个好文本作为Python教程的官方地位。

就像我们想要为标准库采用最好的软件包一样，我想我们应该使用<最好的文档，我认为与教程相比，库存的后向兼容性问题要少于库。 :)

我认为这种改变会给我们提供更好的文档，以及更小的维护负担。如果有一天，当Mark Pilgrim或Swaroop CH不想要维护这些文本时，我强烈怀疑
还有其他教程我们可以用
代替它们。没有其他人介入以保持最新状态。

While the official Python Tutorial has served its
purpose well, keeping it up to date is hardly anyones
top priority, and there are others who passionately
create really good Python tutorials on the web.

I think ''A Byte of Python'' by Swaroop C H is a good
beginners tutorial, and ''Dive Into Python'' by Mark
Pilgrim is a good tutorial for more experienced
programmers.

My radical idea is that we mirror these at
diveinto.python.org and byteof.python.org, and
simply remove the old tutorial from the Python
2.5 (or 2.6?) docs. Give these two good texts an
official status as the Python tutorials.

Just as we want to adopt best of breed packages
for the standard library, I think we should use
best of breed documentation, and I think there are
less backward compatibility issues with tutorials
than with libraries. :)

I think this change would give us better docs as
well as a smaller maintenance burden. If a day
comes when Mark Pilgrim or Swaroop C H don''t want
to maintain these texts, I strongly suspect that
there are other tutorials we can replace them with
if noone else steps in to keep them up to date.

如何将当前教程放入wiki并查看

人是否开始更新它？我不是说它会起作用，但它可能会产生有趣的效果......


Ed

How about putting the current tutorial into the wiki and seeing if
people start updating it? I''m not saying it would work, but it might
have interesting effects...

Ed

现在有超过300个教程列在
www。 awaretek.com/tutorials.html 所以人们甚至可以想象一下

" mega-tutorial"使用每个小节的最佳教程，

a la Turbogears ;-)））


当然它可能会有不同的相似之处一个FrankenTutorial

;-)））

Ron Stephens

There are now more than 300 tutorials listed at
www.awaretek.com/tutorials.html so one could even imagine a
"mega-tutorial" using the best-of-breed tutorial for each sub-section,
a la Turbogears ;-)))

Of course it might bear an unholy resemblance to a FrankenTutorial
;-)))

Ron Stephens

我认为你们有所作为。我们需要一些方法来聚合，

更新，并且不仅扩展教程，而且扩展Python上的各种信息.b
材料。 Python Wiki是一个适合所有人的好地方，

虽然它到目前为止还没有变成类似维基百科的东西。


AdSR

I think you guys are up to something. We need some way to aggregate,
update, and extend not just tutorials but all kinds of informatory
material on Python. The Python Wiki is a good place for all that,
although it hasn''t become anything resembling a Wikipedia so far.

AdSR

这篇关于重新思考Python教程的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！