C.NET VS VB6 [英] C.NET VS VB6

问题描述

大家好，


我们收到此消息是为了回应我们在贸易展览会上提出的问题

会议。我们建议的应用程序的目标功能包括一个企业

应用程序来处理数字，显示表单，发送电子邮件和数据库

访问，将启用Web以便用户设置权限，操纵用户

帐户，以及通过网络计费，通过

网络操作数据库信息。


<评论剪辑>


.........此外，使用Visual Basic作为开发环境会给自己造成风险发展。一般来说，当

目标功能与其功能非常匹配时，像Visual Basic这样的工具最有效。当目标功能

要求开发人员延伸该工具的功能时，它可能会导致意外的显着开发时间。

。为了更好地创建应用程序的灵活性，我们建议在C＃.NET中执行

开发。但是，只要你愿意妥协你的功能集

以匹配Visual Basic的功能，VB就应该提供足够的结果。


< End Comment snip>


我错过了什么吗？你们中的任何人都可以给我带来好处或者你们的意见

以及那些功能集的候选名单VB不会做的功能

嗯。我认为整个MS办公套件都有VB主干。
什么会在VB6中受到损害而不是C＃.net ??

谢谢AK

Hello All,

We received this in response to a question we had posed at a trade show
meeting. Our proposed app''s target features consist of a business
application to crunch numbers, show forms, send emails and have Database
access, would be web enabled so users set permissions, manipulate user
accounts, and billing over web, manipulate database information over the
web.

<Comment snip >

........."Also, the use of Visual Basic as the development environment poses
its own risk to the development. In general, tools like Visual Basic are
most effective when
target features closely match their capabilities. When target features
require the developer to
stretch the capabilities of the tool, it can result in significant,
unexpected development time. For
better flexibility in creating the application, we would recommend that
development be performed
in C#.NET. However, as long as you''re willing to compromise your feature set
to match
the capabilities of Visual Basic, VB should deliver adequate results."

<End Comment snip>

Am I missing something? Could any of you give my the benefit or your opinion
and a shortlist of those "feature sets" capabilities that VB does not do too
well at. I
thought the whole MS office suite had a VB backbone. What would be
compromised in VB6 as opposed to C#.net??
Thanks AK

推荐答案

好奇，为什么选择在C＃.Net与VB6而不是C＃.Net

与VB.Net之间？

-

Terry

" AK"写道：

Just curious, why would the choice be between C#.Net vs. VB6 and not C#.Net
vs. VB.Net?
--
Terry
"AK" wrote:

大家好，


我们收到了这个回应我们在贸易展上提出的问题

会议。我们建议的应用程序的目标功能包括一个企业

应用程序来处理数字，显示表单，发送电子邮件和数据库

访问，将启用Web以便用户设置权限，操纵用户

帐户，以及通过网络计费，通过

网络操作数据库信息。


<评论剪辑>


.........此外，使用Visual Basic作为开发环境会给自己造成风险发展。一般来说，当

目标功能与其功能非常匹配时，像Visual Basic这样的工具最有效。当目标功能

要求开发人员延伸该工具的功能时，它可能会导致意外的显着开发时间。

。为了更好地创建应用程序的灵活性，我们建议在C＃.NET中执行

开发。但是，只要你愿意妥协你的功能集

以匹配Visual Basic的功能，VB就应该提供足够的结果。


< End Comment snip>


我错过了什么吗？你们中的任何人都可以给我带来好处或者你们的意见

以及那些功能集的候选名单VB不会做的功能

嗯。我认为整个MS办公套件都有VB主干。
什么是

在VB6中被攻陷而不是C＃.net ??


谢谢AK

Hello All,

We received this in response to a question we had posed at a trade show
meeting. Our proposed app''s target features consist of a business
application to crunch numbers, show forms, send emails and have Database
access, would be web enabled so users set permissions, manipulate user
accounts, and billing over web, manipulate database information over the
web.

<Comment snip >

........."Also, the use of Visual Basic as the development environment poses
its own risk to the development. In general, tools like Visual Basic are
most effective when
target features closely match their capabilities. When target features
require the developer to
stretch the capabilities of the tool, it can result in significant,
unexpected development time. For
better flexibility in creating the application, we would recommend that
development be performed
in C#.NET. However, as long as you''re willing to compromise your feature set
to match
the capabilities of Visual Basic, VB should deliver adequate results."

<End Comment snip>

Am I missing something? Could any of you give my the benefit or your opinion
and a shortlist of those "feature sets" capabilities that VB does not do too
well at. I
thought the whole MS office suite had a VB backbone. What would be
compromised in VB6 as opposed to C#.net??
Thanks AK

如果你在谈论VB.Net VS C＃


在你需要的功能中，VB.Net和C＃都可以完成这项工作

imho


对于C＃没有的项目，VB有一些重要的额外功能


1. VB.Net程序员更容易找到

2. VB.net程序员比C＃程序员更便宜

3. VB是一个真正的RAD平台

4. VB有一个更大，更活跃的社区


在firewar开始之前我也用C＃编程并找到C＃更好的低价

级别的东西不是因为VB不能做这个工作因为它可以

但是因为很多Java和C项目被移植到C＃所以

它更容易找到一些关于如何做点什么


问候


Michel Posseth [MCP]


" Terry" < Te *** @ nospam.nospamschreef在bericht

新闻：5E *************************** ******* @ microsof t.com ...

if you were talking about VB.Net VS C#

In the features that you require both VB.Net and C# can do the job

i.m.h.o.

VB has some important extra`s for a project that C# not has

1. VB.Net programmers are easier to find
2. VB.net programmers are cheaper as C# programmers
3. VB is a true RAD platform
4. VB has a bigger and more active comunity

before a flamewar starts i also program in C# and find C# better for low
level stuff not because VB couldn`t do the job cause it can
but just for the fact that a lot of Java and C projects are ported to C# so
it is easier to find some docu on how to do stuff

regards

Michel Posseth [MCP]

"Terry" <Te***@nospam.nospamschreef in bericht
news:5E**********************************@microsof t.com...

只是好奇，为什么选择在C＃.Net与VB6之间而不是

C＃.Net

vs. VB.Net？

-

Terry


" AK"写道：

Just curious, why would the choice be between C#.Net vs. VB6 and not
C#.Net
vs. VB.Net?
--
Terry
"AK" wrote:

>大家好，

我们收到了这个回复我们在贸易展上提出的问题
会议。我们建议的应用程序的目标功能包括一个业务
应用程序，以处理数字，显示表单，发送电子邮件和数据库访问，将启用Web，以便用户设置权限，操纵用户
帐户，以及通过网络收费，通过
网络操纵数据库信息。

<评论剪辑>

........."另外，使用Visual Basic作为开发环境会给开发带来风险。通常，当目标功能与其功能紧密匹配时，Visual Basic等工具最有效。当目标功能要求开发人员扩展工具的功能时，可能会导致显着的，意外的开发时间。为了更好地创建应用程序的灵活性，我们建议在C＃.NET中执行
开发。但是，只要你愿意妥协你的功能
设置
以匹配Visual Basic的功能，VB就应该提供足够的结果。
< End Comment snip>

我错过了什么吗？你们中的任何人都可以给我我的好处或者你的意见
以及那些功能集的候选名单。 VB不做的功能
太好了。我认为整个MS办公套件都有VB主干。什么会在VB6中受到损害而不是C＃.net ??

感谢AK

>Hello All,

We received this in response to a question we had posed at a trade show
meeting. Our proposed app''s target features consist of a business
application to crunch numbers, show forms, send emails and have Database
access, would be web enabled so users set permissions, manipulate user
accounts, and billing over web, manipulate database information over the
web.

<Comment snip >

........."Also, the use of Visual Basic as the development environment
poses
its own risk to the development. In general, tools like Visual Basic are
most effective when
target features closely match their capabilities. When target features
require the developer to
stretch the capabilities of the tool, it can result in significant,
unexpected development time. For
better flexibility in creating the application, we would recommend that
development be performed
in C#.NET. However, as long as you''re willing to compromise your feature
set
to match
the capabilities of Visual Basic, VB should deliver adequate results."

<End Comment snip>

Am I missing something? Could any of you give my the benefit or your
opinion
and a shortlist of those "feature sets" capabilities that VB does not do
too
well at. I
thought the whole MS office suite had a VB backbone. What would be
compromised in VB6 as opposed to C#.net??
Thanks AK

嘿伙计，


感谢您的投入..

回答有关我为什么询问VB6而不是<的问题br $> b $ b VB.net

我们在VB6中有一个臭鼬工作的概念原型，因为它是我们在架子上的工具

当我们说过踢东西的时候。它已经很好地完成了，但是你们都知道，这些东西可以承担起自己的生命，因为范围很大，可以添加功能，而我正在尝试看看这条路。

如果我们采取进一步的措施，我只想知道我们多久要用各种语言来逃离悬崖。 （也许我们应该移植到

VB.net ??? VB.NET如何更好VB6？）


我之前的商店评估与编码人员的对话是

各种语言更适合各种任务。进一步按，

虽然，我多次发现那些贬低C ++例如
的人不是C ++商店，而那些贬低VB或VB.net的人是C ++商店！

我总是认为这样的谈话有点像说Fords是

crummy cars因为我驾驶雪佛兰！！

AK


" Terry" < Te *** @ nospam.nospamwrote in message

news：5E *************************** ******* @ microsof t.com ...

Hey Guys,

Thanks for the input..
In answer to the question about why I was asking about VB6 as opposed to
VB.net

We have a skunk worked concept prototype in VB6 simply because it was tool
that we had on the shelf when we stated kicking things around. It has done
well, but as you all know, these things can take on a life of their own as
far as scope creep to add features, and I am trying to look down the road.
If we take things further i just wanted to know how soon we were going to
run off a cliff with the various lanuguges. (Maybe we should port to
VB.net??? How is VB.net better that VB6??)

My assessment from prior shop-talk conversations with coders was that
various languages are better suited to various tasks. On pressing further,
though, I many times found that those that were dissing C++ for example
were not C++ shops, and those that were dissing VB or VB.net were C++ shops!
I alway have thought that such talk was kind of like saying "Fords are
crummy cars because I drive a Chevy"!
AK

"Terry" <Te***@nospam.nospamwrote in message
news:5E**********************************@microsof t.com...

只是好奇，为什么选择在C＃.Net与VB6之间而不是

C＃.Net

vs. VB.Net？

-

Terry


" AK"写道：

Just curious, why would the choice be between C#.Net vs. VB6 and not
C#.Net
vs. VB.Net?
--
Terry
"AK" wrote:

>大家好，

我们收到了这个回复我们在贸易展上提出的问题
会议。我们建议的应用程序的目标功能包括一个业务
应用程序，以处理数字，显示表单，发送电子邮件和数据库访问，将启用Web，以便用户设置权限，操纵用户
帐户，以及通过网络收费，通过
网络操纵数据库信息。

<评论剪辑>

........."另外，使用Visual Basic作为开发环境会给开发带来风险。通常，当目标功能与其功能紧密匹配时，Visual Basic等工具最有效。当目标功能要求开发人员扩展工具的功能时，可能会导致显着的，意外的开发时间。为了更好地创建应用程序的灵活性，我们建议在C＃.NET中执行
开发。但是，只要你愿意妥协你的功能
设置
以匹配Visual Basic的功能，VB就应该提供足够的结果。
< End Comment snip>

我错过了什么吗？你们中的任何人都可以给我我的好处或者你的意见
以及那些功能集的候选名单。 VB不做的功能
太好了。我认为整个MS办公套件都有VB主干。什么会在VB6中受到损害而不是C＃.net ??

感谢AK

>Hello All,

We received this in response to a question we had posed at a trade show
meeting. Our proposed app''s target features consist of a business
application to crunch numbers, show forms, send emails and have Database
access, would be web enabled so users set permissions, manipulate user
accounts, and billing over web, manipulate database information over the
web.

<Comment snip >

........."Also, the use of Visual Basic as the development environment
poses
its own risk to the development. In general, tools like Visual Basic are
most effective when
target features closely match their capabilities. When target features
require the developer to
stretch the capabilities of the tool, it can result in significant,
unexpected development time. For
better flexibility in creating the application, we would recommend that
development be performed
in C#.NET. However, as long as you''re willing to compromise your feature
set
to match
the capabilities of Visual Basic, VB should deliver adequate results."

<End Comment snip>

Am I missing something? Could any of you give my the benefit or your
opinion
and a shortlist of those "feature sets" capabilities that VB does not do
too
well at. I
thought the whole MS office suite had a VB backbone. What would be
compromised in VB6 as opposed to C#.net??
Thanks AK

这篇关于C.NET VS VB6的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！