Java终于拥有了一个出色的gui构建器 [英] Java finally has a fantastic gui builder
问题描述
前一段时间我评估了Eclipse与Visual Studio，并确定了
Visual Studio 2005.Eclipse在很多方面都比较好，但是缺少了b $ ba gui builder决定因素。 Visual Studio 2005有一个优秀的gui构建器。 Eclipse没有，事实上，没有任何一个Java IDE拥有一个半合适的gui构建器。我们的应用程序将有很多
对话框，我们并没有浪费我们的职业生涯手工编写GridBagLayouts。
但是新的NetBeans Java IDE有世界上最好的gui建设者。
至少从这个演示开始，它似乎领先于微软的GUI
建设者甚至：
http://www.netbeans.org/files /docume...5/matisse.html
对我来说太迟了;我们不会回到Java。
A while ago I evaluated Eclipse vs Visual Studio, and settled on
Visual Studio 2005. Eclipse is better in many ways, but the lack of
a gui builder was the deciding factor. Visual Studio 2005 has an
excellent gui builder. Eclipse doesn''t, and in fact, none of the
Java IDEs had a half-decent gui builder. Our apps will have lots of
dialogs, and we didn''t waste our careers hand-coding GridBagLayouts.
But the new NetBeans Java IDE has the best gui builder in the world.
From this demo at least, it seems to be ahead of Microsoft''s GUI
builder even:
http://www.netbeans.org/files/docume...5/matisse.html
Too late for me though; we are not going back to Java.
推荐答案
2006年2月3日09:03:49 -0800，surabhi< su * ****@example.com>写道：
On 3 Feb 2006 09:03:49 -0800, surabhi <su*****@example.com> wrote:
前一段时间我评估了Eclipse与Visual Studio，并确定了Visual Studio 2005.Eclipse在很多方面都比较好，但缺乏
一个gui建设者是决定因素。 Visual Studio 2005具有优秀的gui构建器。 Eclipse并没有，事实上，没有一个Java IDE拥有一个半合适的gui构建器。我们的应用程序将有很多
对话框，我们并没有浪费我们的职业生涯手工编写GridBagLayouts。
但是新的NetBeans Java IDE拥有世界上最好的gui构建器。至少从这个演示开始，它似乎领先于微软的GUI
构建器：
http://www.netbeans.org/files/docume...5/matisse.html
对我来说太迟了;我们不会回到Java。
A while ago I evaluated Eclipse vs Visual Studio, and settled on
Visual Studio 2005. Eclipse is better in many ways, but the lack of
a gui builder was the deciding factor. Visual Studio 2005 has an
excellent gui builder. Eclipse doesn''t, and in fact, none of the
Java IDEs had a half-decent gui builder. Our apps will have lots of
dialogs, and we didn''t waste our careers hand-coding GridBagLayouts.
But the new NetBeans Java IDE has the best gui builder in the world.
From this demo at least, it seems to be ahead of Microsoft''s GUI
builder even:
http://www.netbeans.org/files/docume...5/matisse.html
Too late for me though; we are not going back to Java.
你的问题是什么？
Otis Mukinfus
http://www.otismukinfus.com
http://www.tomchilders.com
文章< pk ***** ***************************@4ax.com> ;, Otis Mukinfus
拿了汉堡包，把它扔了烤架，我说哦哇......
In article <pk********************************@4ax.com>, Otis Mukinfus
took the hamburger, threw it on the grill, and I said "Oh wow"...
2006年2月3日09:03:49 -0800，surabhi< su ***** @ example。 COM>写道：
On 3 Feb 2006 09:03:49 -0800, surabhi <su*****@example.com> wrote:
前一段时间我评估了Eclipse与Visual Studio，并确定了Visual Studio 2005.Eclipse在很多方面都比较好，但缺乏
一个gui建设者是决定因素。 Visual Studio 2005具有优秀的gui构建器。 Eclipse并没有，事实上，没有一个Java IDE拥有一个半合适的gui构建器。我们的应用程序将有很多
对话框，我们并没有浪费我们的职业生涯手工编写GridBagLayouts。
但是新的NetBeans Java IDE拥有世界上最好的gui构建器。至少从这个演示开始，它似乎领先于微软的GUI
构建器：
http://www.netbeans.org/files/docume...5/matisse.html
对我来说太迟了;我们不会回到Java。
A while ago I evaluated Eclipse vs Visual Studio, and settled on
Visual Studio 2005. Eclipse is better in many ways, but the lack of
a gui builder was the deciding factor. Visual Studio 2005 has an
excellent gui builder. Eclipse doesn''t, and in fact, none of the
Java IDEs had a half-decent gui builder. Our apps will have lots of
dialogs, and we didn''t waste our careers hand-coding GridBagLayouts.
But the new NetBeans Java IDE has the best gui builder in the world.
From this demo at least, it seems to be ahead of Microsoft''s GUI
builder even:
http://www.netbeans.org/files/docume...5/matisse.html
Too late for me though; we are not going back to Java.
你的问题是什么？
What was your question?
他们为什么要在页面上使用flash？
-
面条杰弗逊
mhm31x9 Smeeter＃29＃WSD 30
sTaRShInE_mOOnBeAm在Hotmail点com <无线电通信/>
NP：Jellyroll - 蓝色谋杀
现在，技术一直在变得越来越好，这很好，
但是大部分时间都是你需要的是一根口香糖，
a折刀，还有一个微笑。
- Robert Redford间谍游戏
Why are they using flash for the page?
--
Noodles Jefferson
mhm31x9 Smeeter#29 WSD#30
sTaRShInE_mOOnBeAm aT HoTmAil dOt CoM
NP: "Jellyroll" -- Blue Murder
"Now, technology''s getting better all the time and that''s fine,
but most of the time all you need is a stick of gum,
a pocketknife, and a smile."
-- Robert Redford "Spy Game"
你不明白吗？ ......他没有问题，这只是一个咆哮的声音
在爪哇。
可怜的灵魂''Mukinfus'' - 甚至名字也增加了悲伤。
" Otis Mukinfus" < pH值*** @ emailaddress.com>在留言中写道
news：pk ******************************** @ 4ax.com ...
Don''t you see? ... he didn''t have a question, it was just a ranting whinge
at Java.
Poor soul ''Mukinfus'' - even the name adds to the sadness.
"Otis Mukinfus" <ph***@emailaddress.com> wrote in message
news:pk********************************@4ax.com...
2006年2月3日09:03:49 -0800，surabhi< su ***** @ example.com>写道：
On 3 Feb 2006 09:03:49 -0800, surabhi <su*****@example.com> wrote:
前一段时间我评估了Eclipse与Visual Studio，并确定了Visual Studio 2005.Eclipse在很多方面都比较好，但缺乏
一个gui建设者是决定因素。 Visual Studio 2005具有优秀的gui构建器。 Eclipse并没有，事实上，没有一个Java IDE拥有一个半合适的gui构建器。我们的应用程序将有很多
对话框，我们并没有浪费我们的职业生涯手工编写GridBagLayouts。
但是新的NetBeans Java IDE拥有世界上最好的gui构建器。至少从这个演示开始，它似乎领先于微软的GUI
构建器：
http://www.netbeans.org/files/docume...5/matisse.html
对我来说太迟了;我们不会回到Java。
A while ago I evaluated Eclipse vs Visual Studio, and settled on
Visual Studio 2005. Eclipse is better in many ways, but the lack of
a gui builder was the deciding factor. Visual Studio 2005 has an
excellent gui builder. Eclipse doesn''t, and in fact, none of the
Java IDEs had a half-decent gui builder. Our apps will have lots of
dialogs, and we didn''t waste our careers hand-coding GridBagLayouts.
But the new NetBeans Java IDE has the best gui builder in the world.
From this demo at least, it seems to be ahead of Microsoft''s GUI
builder even:
http://www.netbeans.org/files/docume...5/matisse.html
Too late for me though; we are not going back to Java.
你的问题是什么？
Otis Mukinfus
http://www.otismukinfus.com
http://www.tomchilders.com
这篇关于Java终于拥有了一个出色的gui构建器的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
