空论坛和广告偏见 [英] Empty Forum and Advertising Prejudices
问题描述
好吧，谈到SBI！......我从他们那里学到的两件事是
空论坛偏见和广告偏见......显然，一个空的论坛会关闭访客，使他们再也不会访问该网站
了 - 是吗？
SBI！建议开始一个论坛 - 如果有必要，首先 -
只有当每天至少有五十个访客时;最好是一百元......但是如果确实存在空的论坛偏见，那么它是否可以成功反击
成功反击 - 彻底中和 - 好原创
内容??
和广告偏见......显然有些人在广告上涨时停止访问网站......没有什么可以冒犯的，现在，就像
不断的弹出窗口和飞越和动画横幅......但显然
有些人根本就不喜欢任何广告 - - 和
这些目录编辑器就在其中！这也是真的吗？为什么
应该让人们对旧媒体没有问题（或很少）比如
报纸得到了广告的支持，但是这个问题与
网站有同样的问题，即使他们以前喜欢过的网站也是如此，
这样的他们再也不去参观了吗？
一如既往，非常感谢您的所有时间和帮助！
Well, speaking of SBI!...two of the things I''ve learned from them are
"empty forum prejudice" and "advertising prejudice"...apparently, an
empty forum turns off visitors such that they never visit the site
again -- true?
SBI! recommends starting a forum -- if necessary in the first place --
only when there are at least fifty visitors a day; preferably one
hundred...but if empty forum prejudice does exist, could it be
successfully counters -- outright neutralized -- by good original
content??
And advertising prejudice...apparently there are people who stop
visiting a site when ads go up...nothing outrageous, now, like
constant pop-ups and fly-overs and animated banners...but apparently
there are people who just don''t like any advertising at all -- and
these directory editors are among them! Is that true, too?? Why
should people have no problem (or very little) with "old media" like
newspapers being supported by advertising but have such a problem with
websites that do the same, even those they had previously enjoyed,
such that they never visit again??
As always, many thanks for all your time and help!
推荐答案
囚犯War写道：
Prisoner at War wrote:
好吧，谈到SBI！......我从他们那里学到的两件事是
"空论坛偏见和广告偏见......显然，一个空的论坛会关闭访客，使他们再也不会访问该网站
了 - 是吗？
SBI！建议开始一个论坛 - 如果有必要，首先 -
只有当每天至少有五十个访客时;最好是一百元......但是如果确实存在空的论坛偏见，那么它是否可以成功反击
成功反击 - 彻底中和 - 好原创
内容??
和广告偏见......显然有些人在广告上涨时停止访问网站......没有什么可以冒犯的，现在，就像
不断的弹出窗口和飞越和动画横幅......但显然
有些人根本就不喜欢任何广告 - - 和
这些目录编辑器就在其中！这也是真的吗？为什么
应该让人们对旧媒体没有问题（或很少）比如
报纸得到了广告的支持，但是这个问题与
网站有同样的问题，即使他们以前喜欢过的网站也是如此，
这样的他们再也不去参观了？
一如既往，非常感谢您的所有时间和帮助！
Well, speaking of SBI!...two of the things I''ve learned from them are
"empty forum prejudice" and "advertising prejudice"...apparently, an
empty forum turns off visitors such that they never visit the site
again -- true?
SBI! recommends starting a forum -- if necessary in the first place --
only when there are at least fifty visitors a day; preferably one
hundred...but if empty forum prejudice does exist, could it be
successfully counters -- outright neutralized -- by good original
content??
And advertising prejudice...apparently there are people who stop
visiting a site when ads go up...nothing outrageous, now, like
constant pop-ups and fly-overs and animated banners...but apparently
there are people who just don''t like any advertising at all -- and
these directory editors are among them! Is that true, too?? Why
should people have no problem (or very little) with "old media" like
newspapers being supported by advertising but have such a problem with
websites that do the same, even those they had previously enjoyed,
such that they never visit again??
As always, many thanks for all your time and help!
我''建议你停止交叉发布到这么多的新闻组。如果你想要讨论这个问题，请选择一两个适合的人，并自行限制
。
否则人们我会停止回答你。
-
==================
删除x来自我的电子邮件地址
Jerry Stuckle
JDS计算机培训公司
js ******* @ attglobal.net
==================
I''d suggest you stop cross posting to so many newsgroups. If you want
to discuss this, pick one or two whcih are appropriate and limit
yourself to those.
Otherwise people are going to stop answering you.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
js*******@attglobal.net
==================
感谢您的建议，但我不明白交叉发布
偏见 - 我的意思是，我的问题与新闻组相关 -
张贴;我不是在rec.europe.travel询问访客心理学
什么的！我是否应该向每个
相关新闻组发布相同的消息？相关的交叉发布怎么样？
会减损任何人对usenet的体验？
5月11日上午9:49，Jerry Stuckle< jstuck ...... @ attglobal.netwrote：
Thanks for the suggestion, but I don''t understand "cross-posting
prejudice" -- I mean, my question is relevant to the newsgroups cross-
posted; I''m not asking about visitor psychology in rec.europe.travel
or something! Am I supposed to post the same message to every
relevant newsgroup instead?? Just how does relevant cross-posting
detract from anyone''s experience of usenet?
On May 11, 9:49 am, Jerry Stuckle <jstuck...@attglobal.netwrote:
>
我建议你停止交叉发布到这么多的新闻组。如果你想要讨论这个问题，请选择一两个适合的人，并自行限制
。
否则人们我会停止回答你。
-
==================
删除x来自我的电子邮件地址
Jerry Stuckle
JDS计算机培训公司
jstuck ... @ attglobal.net
==================
>
I''d suggest you stop cross posting to so many newsgroups. If you want
to discuss this, pick one or two whcih are appropriate and limit
yourself to those.
Otherwise people are going to stop answering you.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstuck...@attglobal.net
==================
On 2008-05-11 11:34:04 - 0400，战争中的囚徒< pr ************* @ yahoo.com上述：
On 2008-05-11 11:34:04 -0400, Prisoner at War <pr*************@yahoo.comsaid:
>
5月11日上午9:49，Jerry Stuckle< jstuck ... @ attglobal.netwrote：
>
On May 11, 9:49 am, Jerry Stuckle <jstuck...@attglobal.netwrote:
>>
我建议你停止交叉发布到这么多的新闻组。如果你想讨论这个问题，请选择一两个适合自己的人，并将自己限制在那些人之间。
否则人们就会停止回答你。
>>
I''d suggest you stop cross posting to so many newsgroups. If you want
to discuss this, pick one or two whcih are appropriate and limit
yourself to those.
Otherwise people are going to stop answering you.
感谢您的建议，但我不明白交叉发布
偏见 - 我的意思是，我的问题与新闻组相关 -
张贴;我不是在rec.europe.travel询问访客心理学
什么的！我是否应该向每个
相关新闻组发布相同的消息？相关的交叉发布如何降低任何人对usenet的体验？
Thanks for the suggestion, but I don''t understand "cross-posting
prejudice" -- I mean, my question is relevant to the newsgroups cross-
posted; I''m not asking about visitor psychology in rec.europe.travel
or something! Am I supposed to post the same message to every
relevant newsgroup instead?? Just how does relevant cross-posting
detract from anyone''s experience of usenet?
没有多重打印通常会更糟。只需选择一两组，
寻找反馈。合并它，然后考虑在另一个
组中发布以获得不同的角度。
也可以转发到群组，通常可以通过
新闻服务器或读者（因为它是垃圾邮件的标志）。或者可能导致
许多类似的评论，因为更多人在同一时间回复
。
- -
Rob McAninch
http://rock13.com/
No multiposting would typically be worse. Just pick a group or two,
look for feedback. Incorporate it, then consider posting in another
group to get a different angle.
Crossposting to too may groups, often gets your messages filtered by
either news servers or readers (as it is sign of spam). Or may lead to
many similar comments as a larger number of people are replying at
about the same time.
--
Rob McAninch
http://rock13.com/
这篇关于空论坛和广告偏见的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
