Re：递归make的问题。 [英] Re: Problem with recursive make.
问题描述
2008-09-09 17:53， co ******* ********@gmail.com 写道：
为什么你从所有可能的小组中挑选这个小组来问这个
的问题？毕竟，它与C ++没有任何关系，也不会与福特汽车有任何关系，但我不知何故怀疑
你没有问过在alt.autos.ford。
我得到了下面的论文，发现了递归make
的问题。我猜FreeBSD使用递归make。任何人都可以对它进行评论
，请清楚我怀疑为什么我们使用递归make。
因为递归制作很容易做到并理解，一旦有人完成了它，其他人都认为这是要走的路吗？
-
Erik Wikstr ?? m
9月9,10：26 * pm，Erik Wikstr？m< Erik-wikst ... @ telia.comwrote：
On 2008-09-09 17:53 ，contactmayankj ... @ gmail.com写道：
你为什么选择在所有可能的小组中，这个小组要问这个
的问题？毕竟，它与C ++没有任何关系，也不会与福特汽车有任何关系，但我不知何故怀疑
你没有问过在alt.autos.ford。
我想我的意思是大多数C ++开发人员都熟悉
Makefiles和automake .. ..所以它是讨论的最佳场所。
我得到了下面的论文，发现了递归make
的问题。我猜FreeBSD使用递归make。任何人都可以对它进行评论
，请清楚我怀疑为什么我们使用递归make。
因为递归制作很容易做到并理解，一旦有人完成了它，其他人都认为这是要走的路吗？
如果有问题，我们不能改进吗？
Mayank Jain
>
-
Erik Wikstr？m
9月10日，3：11 am，contactmayankj ... @ gmail.com
< contactmayankj ... @ gmail.comwrote：
9月9日晚上10点26分，Erik Wikstr？m< Erik-wikst ... @ telia.com>
写道：在2008-09-09 17:53，contactmayankj。 .. @ gmail.com
写道：
你为什么选择这个小组，在所有可能的小组中，
问这个问题？毕竟，它没有任何与C ++有关的
，也没有与福特
汽车有任何关系，但我不知何故怀疑你没有问过在
alt.autos.ford。
我想我的意思是大多数C ++开发人员熟悉
与Makefiles和automake。 ...
我对此表示怀疑。我熟悉GNU make（但不是其他品牌），
但是我不知道automake做了什么 - 我从来没有听说过它。
我绝对是C ++开发人员。
因此它是最好的讨论场所。
大多数C ++开发人员都懂英语，所以这是讨论英语语法的最好的b
。大多数C ++开发人员都会吃，所以
这是讨论食物的最佳场所。
非常规。
-
James Kanze（GABI软件）电子邮件：ja ********* @ gmail.com
Conseils eninformatiqueorientéeobjet/
Beratung in objektorientierter Datenverarbeitung
9placeSémard，78210 St.-Cyr-l''coco，France，+ 33（0）1 30 23 00 34
James Kanze写道：
大多数C ++开发人员都吃，所以这是讨论食物的最佳场所。
如果错误的响应时间让他们有机会这样做，那么:-)
-
Gennaro Prota | name.surname yahoo.com
Breeze C ++（预览版）：< https：//sourceforge.net/projects/breeze/>
你需要C ++方面的专业知识吗？ ？我有空。
On 2008-09-09 17:53, co***************@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
And why did you pick this group, out of all possible groups, to ask this
question? After all, it does not have anything to do with C++, nor does
it have anything to do with Ford cars either, but I somehow suspect that
you did not ask in alt.autos.ford.
I got the below paper and found the problems with which recursive make
have. I guess FreeBSD use recursive make. Can any one comment on it
and please clear my doubts why we use recursive make.
Because recursive make is easy to do and understand and once someone had
done it everyone else thought that it was the way to go?
--
Erik Wikstr??m
On Sep 9, 10:26*pm, Erik Wikstr?m <Erik-wikst...@telia.comwrote:On 2008-09-09 17:53, contactmayankj...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
And why did you pick this group, out of all possible groups, to ask this
question? After all, it does not have anything to do with C++, nor does
it have anything to do with Ford cars either, but I somehow suspect that
you did not ask in alt.autos.ford.
I guess all I mean most of the C++ developers are familiar with the
Makefiles and automake.... so its the best place to discuss.I got the below paper and found the problems with which recursive make
have. I guess FreeBSD use recursive make. Can any one comment on it
and please clear my doubts why we use recursive make.
Because recursive make is easy to do and understand and once someone had
done it everyone else thought that it was the way to go?Can''t we improve if something is having bug?
Mayank Jain>
--
Erik Wikstr?m
On Sep 10, 3:11 am, "contactmayankj...@gmail.com"
<contactmayankj...@gmail.comwrote:On Sep 9, 10:26 pm, Erik Wikstr?m <Erik-wikst...@telia.com>
wrote:On 2008-09-09 17:53, contactmayankj...@gmail.com
wrote:
And why did you pick this group, out of all possible groups,
to ask this question? After all, it does not have anything
to do with C++, nor does it have anything to do with Ford
cars either, but I somehow suspect that you did not ask in
alt.autos.ford.
I guess all I mean most of the C++ developers are familiar
with the Makefiles and automake....I doubt it. I''m familiar with GNU make (but not other makes),
but I have no idea what automake does---I''ve never heard of it.
And I''m definitely a C++ developer.
so its the best place to discuss.Most C++ developers understand English, so this is the best
place to discuss English grammar. Most C++ developers eat, so
this is the best place to discuss food.
Non sequitur.
--
James Kanze (GABI Software) email:ja*********@gmail.com
Conseils en informatique orientée objet/
Beratung in objektorientierter Datenverarbeitung
9 place Sémard, 78210 St.-Cyr-l''école, France, +33 (0)1 30 23 00 34
James Kanze wrote:Most C++ developers eat, so this is the best place to discuss food.If bad response times give ''em a chance to do so, yep :-)
--
Gennaro Prota | name.surname yahoo.com
Breeze C++ (preview): <https://sourceforge.net/projects/breeze/>
Do you need expertise in C++? I''m available.
这篇关于Re：递归make的问题。的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
