访问 - > Visual Studio和.Net Framework [英] Access -> Visual Studio and the .Net Framework
问题描述
在过去的几年中，我不得不处理越来越多的问题，包括在
客户机。通常这些都没有安装，安装不正确，或者不是最新的。有60个笔记本，可能有30种不同的配置。
当前Visual Studio（2005？）应用程序需要存在.Net
框架。
这是否减少或增加了我在
第一段中提到的问题的频率？你有经验可以分享吗？
你还知道有关这个
框架的要求存在的任何猜测可能导致进一步合法
微软的问题，基于这样一种观念，即由于框架安装了
（或者是Windows 2003 Server和Windows Vista的一部分），微软
开发软件会比其他公司的b $ b开发软件有不公平的优势吗？
-
lyle fairfield
Over the past several years I have had to deal with an increasing number of
problems involving setting up mdac, isams, service packs and the like on
client machines. Often these are not installed, not installed properly, or
not up-to-date. With 60 notebooks, there may be 30 distinct configurations.
Current Visual Studio (2005?) applications require the presence of the .Net
framework.
Has this lessened or increased the frequency of the problem I mentioned in
paragraph one occurring? Do you have experiences to share?
Further are you aware of any speculation that the requirement of this
framework?s existence is likely to lead to further legal problems for
Microsoft, based on the notion that since the framework is installed with
(or is part of) Windows 2003 Server and Windows Vista, Microsoft
development software will have an unfair advantage over other firm?s
development software?
--
lyle fairfield
推荐答案
2007年10月26日星期五，格林威治标准时间11:03:39，lyle fairfield< ly ****** @ yahoo.ca>
写道：
dotnet框架极大地简化了这些问题，如果你使用
它。也就是说，你仍然可以使用你的dotnet组件中的ADO。
不推荐，但你可以。当然所有的依赖关系
仍然适用。
使用Windows更新自动更新dotnet框架。我不知道mdac是什么。
ISAM我不知道。由于afaik它没有内置到框架中，
你的里程可能会有所不同。
法律角度：我不担心。它要么不会发生，要么花费很多年才能在法庭上自行解决，最后有一些
妥协。
-Tom。
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 11:03:39 GMT, lyle fairfield <ly******@yahoo.ca>
wrote:
The dotnet framework simplifies these matters tremendously, if you use
it. This is to say, you can still use ADO from your dotnet component.
Not recommended, but you can. Then of course all the dependencies
still apply.
The dotnet framework is automatically updated with Windows Updates. I
don''t think mdac is/was.
ISAMs I don''t know. Since afaik it''s not built into the framework,
your mileage may vary.
The legal angle: I would not worry about. It will either not happen or
take many years to wind itself through the courts, with some
compromise at the end.
-Tom.
>
在过去的几年中，我不得不处理越来越多涉及设置mdac的问题客户端机器上的，isams，Service Pack等。通常这些都没有安装，没有正确安装，或者不是最新的。有60个笔记本电脑，可能有30种不同的配置。
当前的Visual Studio（2005？）应用程序需要存在.Net
框架。
这是否减少或增加了我在第一段中提到的问题的频率发生了什么？你有经验可以分享吗？
你还知道有任何关于这个
框架存在的要求可能导致微软进一步法律问题的猜测，基于这样一种观念，即由于框架是与Windows 2003 Server和Windows Vista一起安装的（或者是其一部分），Microsoft
开发软件将比其他公司的开发具有不公平的优势。软件？
>
Over the past several years I have had to deal with an increasing number of
problems involving setting up mdac, isams, service packs and the like on
client machines. Often these are not installed, not installed properly, or
not up-to-date. With 60 notebooks, there may be 30 distinct configurations.
Current Visual Studio (2005?) applications require the presence of the .Net
framework.
Has this lessened or increased the frequency of the problem I mentioned in
paragraph one occurring? Do you have experiences to share?
Further are you aware of any speculation that the requirement of this
framework?s existence is likely to lead to further legal problems for
Microsoft, based on the notion that since the framework is installed with
(or is part of) Windows 2003 Server and Windows Vista, Microsoft
development software will have an unfair advantage over other firm?s
development software?
10月26日上午9:38，Tom van Stiphout< no.spam.tom7 ... @ cox.netwrote：
On Oct 26, 9:38 am, Tom van Stiphout <no.spam.tom7...@cox.netwrote:
星期五，2007年10月26日11:03:39 GMT，lyle fairfield< lylef ... @ yahoo.ca>
写道：
如果使用
，dotnet框架可以极大地简化这些问题。也就是说，你仍然可以使用你的dotnet组件中的ADO。
不推荐，但你可以。当然所有的依赖关系
仍然适用。
使用Windows更新自动更新dotnet框架。我不知道mdac是什么。
ISAM我不知道。由于afaik它没有内置在框架中，
您的里程可能会有所不同。
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 11:03:39 GMT, lyle fairfield <lylef...@yahoo.ca>
wrote:
The dotnet framework simplifies these matters tremendously, if you use
it. This is to say, you can still use ADO from your dotnet component.
Not recommended, but you can. Then of course all the dependencies
still apply.
The dotnet framework is automatically updated with Windows Updates. I
don''t think mdac is/was.
ISAMs I don''t know. Since afaik it''s not built into the framework,
your mileage may vary.
您是否能够将.Net框架与Java Runtime
环境进行比较，例如尺寸，安装简便性等。 />
功能，对其他驻留技术和其他日期的影响 -
今天的计算机操作，与COM技术集成，
和交叉平台适用性？它们基本上是同一类物品吗？
对不起，我看到我要了一本短书，但我在网上找不到什么
关于.Net Framework实际上是什么以及它实际是如何工作的。
所以对这些问题中的任何一个问题的评论都可以帮助我理解。
Are you able to compare the .Net framework with the Java Runtime
Environment on matters such as size, ease of installation,
capabilities, impact on other resident technologies and the other day-
to-day operations of the computer, integration with COM technologies,
and cross-platform applicability? Are they essentially the same kind
of thing?
Sorry, I see I''ve asked for a short book, but I find little on the net
about what the .Net Framework actually is and how it actually works.
So comments on any one of those issues might help me understand.
On Sun，2007年10月28日04:03:23 -0700，lyle< ly ************ @ gmail.com> ;
写道：
对不起，我是一个微观的。
dotnet框架本质上是一个庞大的类库，为程序员提供了大量可编程的类。
你可以命名它，并且有一个封装它的dotnet类。从
字符串类或两个文件流到加密到图形。这是
a高级概述：
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hfa3fa08.aspx
DotNet还提供简单的内存管理（真实的）
COM）的问题在于你基本上不必担心释放内存：
垃圾收集器会在你之后来清理。我知道Java有类似的设施。
-Tom。
On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 04:03:23 -0700, lyle <ly************@gmail.com>
wrote:
Sorry, I''m stictly a microsofty.
The dotnet framework is essentially a huge class library, providing
the programmer with a very large number of classes to program against.
You name it, and there is a dotnet class encapsulating it. From a
String class or two to File Streams to Encryption to Graphics. Here is
a high-level overview:
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hfa3fa08.aspx
DotNet also provides for easy memory management (a real problem with
COM) in that you essentially don''t have to worry about freeing memory:
the garbage collector will come by and clean up after you. I
understand Java has a similar facility.
-Tom.
> On 10月26日上午9：38，Tom van Stiphout< no.spam.tom7 ... @ cox.netwrote：
>On Oct 26, 9:38 am, Tom van Stiphout <no.spam.tom7...@cox.netwrote:
> 2007年10月26日星期五格林威治标准时间11:03:39，lyle fairfield< lylef ... @ yahoo.ca>
写道：
如果你使用
它，dotnet框架可以极大地简化这些问题。也就是说，你仍然可以使用你的dotnet组件中的ADO。
不推荐，但你可以。当然所有的依赖关系仍然适用。
使用Windows更新自动更新dotnet框架。我不认为mdac是/是。
ISAMs我不知道。由于afaik它没有内置在框架中，
您的里程可能会有所不同。
>On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 11:03:39 GMT, lyle fairfield <lylef...@yahoo.ca>
wrote:
The dotnet framework simplifies these matters tremendously, if you use
it. This is to say, you can still use ADO from your dotnet component.
Not recommended, but you can. Then of course all the dependencies
still apply.
The dotnet framework is automatically updated with Windows Updates. I
don''t think mdac is/was.
ISAMs I don''t know. Since afaik it''s not built into the framework,
your mileage may vary.
您是否能够将.Net框架与Java Runtime
环境进行比较，例如尺寸，安装简便性，
功能，对其他居民的影响技术和其他日子 - 今天的计算机操作，与COM技术的集成，以及跨平台的适用性？它们本质上是同一类的东西吗？
对不起，我看到我要了一本简短的书，但我在网上找不到什么。实际上是Net Framework以及它实际上是如何工作的。
所以对这些问题中的任何一个问题的评论可能有助于我理解。
Are you able to compare the .Net framework with the Java Runtime
Environment on matters such as size, ease of installation,
capabilities, impact on other resident technologies and the other day-
to-day operations of the computer, integration with COM technologies,
and cross-platform applicability? Are they essentially the same kind
of thing?
Sorry, I see I''ve asked for a short book, but I find little on the net
about what the .Net Framework actually is and how it actually works.
So comments on any one of those issues might help me understand.
这篇关于访问 - > Visual Studio和.Net Framework的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
