IE字体使用问题...... [英] An IE font usage problem...

查看:87
本文介绍了IE字体使用问题......的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我有一个问题,IE似乎没有使用暗示​​字体文件中的整个字体unicode

子组。当我在

IE 6中显示以下网页而不是Firefox 1.0 PR时。


查看有问题的网页...

http://clientserver.home.comcast.net/unicode .html


如果您检查一些例子,例如平方根

(& amp;#8730;),素数(& amp;#8242;)和双素数(& amp;#8243;)。


在页面底部,在图例中,我已经包括提示

列A,B和C ...


我也看到同样的问题,使用提示的打印字体,当我做的时候打印

网页预览。


那么,为什么IE会对这些产品感兴趣?


Firefox似乎做了一个漂亮的工作,使用所有可用的字符

然后似乎提供,有些字符缺失,优秀

替换其他已安装的字体。


Rich

-
Ri ************* @ comcast.net
http://RichardRPlourde.home.comcast.net

I''ve got a problem that IE doesn''t seem to use the entire font unicode
subgroups from a hinted font file. When I display the following web page in
IE 6 as opposed to Firefox 1.0 PR.

Check out the web page in question...

http://clientserver.home.comcast.net/unicode.html

If you examine, for a few examples, characters such as square root
(√), prime (′) and double prime (″).

At the bottom of the page, in the legend, I''ve included the hints for
columns A, B, and C...

I also see the same problems, with hinted print fonts, when I do a print
preview of the web page.

So, any ideas why IE is puking on these?

Firefox seems to do a beautiful job of using all the available characters
and then seems to provide, were some characters are missing, excellent
substitutions from other installed fonts.

Rich
--
Ri*************@comcast.net
http://RichardRPlourde.home.comcast.net

推荐答案

Richard R Plourde <硒********* @ hotmail.com>在消息中写道

news:55 ******************** @ comcast.com ...
"Richard R Plourde" <Se*********@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:55********************@comcast.com...
查看有问题的网页...

http://clientserver.home.comcast.net/unicode.html
Check out the web page in question...

http://clientserver.home.comcast.net/unicode.html



除上一篇文章外...

使用Windows / XP角色地图程序,它似乎是Unicode子范围

数学运算符这似乎是缺少人物...


不知道这是否暗示我做错了什么。


-

Rich
Ri *** **********@comcast.net
http://RichardRPlourde.home.comcast.net


In addition to the previous post...

Using Windows/XP Character Map program it seems to be the Unicode subrange
"Mathematical Operators" which appears to be missing the characters...

Don''t know if that''s a hint to what I''m doing wrong.

--
Rich
Ri*************@comcast.net
http://RichardRPlourde.home.comcast.net


2004年10月31日,Sun,Richard R Plourde写道:
On Sun, 31 Oct 2004, Richard R Plourde wrote:
如果您检查一些例子,例如平方根(& amp;#8730;),素数(& amp;#8242;)和双素数(& amp; amp; amp; #8243)。
所以,任何想法为什么IE都在喋喋不休?


其中一个原因之一:


1)字体并不声称支持相关字符范围,

但您的浏览器配置没有配置合适的字体

用于后备。


2)字体-does-声称支持有问题的字符范围,

但其支持不完整。在这种情况下,IE似乎不会花费很多钱去寻找丢失的角色。


简单推荐:不要为晦涩指定字体面

个字符。用户 - 可能 - 需要调整他们的浏览器配置

(特别是IE)。


当你比我更了解IE的行为时,你/使用非常精心挑选的字体

规范(参见这些

usenet组中我和A.Prilop之间的讨论)可能/得到

稍微好一点的结果)。但我仍然持怀疑态度。


与MS OS一起分发的各种字体的实际表达式

因操作系统版本而异,即使没有更改名称

的字体。因此,不要认为你在测试上的曲目(例如)
XP(例如)也适用于'2000,当然不适用于NT4。

但是Lucida如果用户拥有它,那么无法使用Unicode或Arial Unicode MS,对于困难的角色来说,这是很好的选择。


Do -not-在任何帐户上放置通用在这种情况下,你的CSS字体列表中的sans-serif或serif



Firefox似乎在使用所有可用字符方面做得很漂亮
If you examine, for a few examples, characters such as square root
(&amp;#8730;), prime (&amp;#8242;) and double prime (&amp;#8243;). So, any ideas why IE is puking on these?
One of two reasons:

1) the font doesn''t claim to support the character range in question,
but your browser configuration hasn''t configured an appropriate font
for fallback.

2) the font -does- claim to support the character range in question,
but its support is incomplete. In this situation, IE seemingly makes
no effort to hunt the missing characters.

Simple recommendation: don''t specify font faces for obscure
characters. Users -may- need to tune their browser configuration
(especially IE).

When you understand IE''s behaviour better than I do, you /might/ get
marginally better results with a very carefully chosen font
specification (see discussions between myself and A.Prilop in these
usenet groups). But I''m still sceptical.

The actual -repertoire- of various fonts distributed with MS OSes
varies from one OS version to another, even without change in the name
of the font. So don''t assume that the repertoire that you tested on
XP (for example) will also work for ''2000, and certainly not for NT4.
But Lucida Sans Unicode, or Arial Unicode MS if the user has it, are
good choices for difficult characters.

Do -not- on any account put the generic sans-serif or serif at the end
of your CSS font list, in such a situation.
Firefox seems to do a beautiful job of using all the available characters




那里没有惊喜。



No surprises there.


2004年10月31日,Sun,Richard R Plourde写道: br>
On Sun, 31 Oct 2004, Richard R Plourde wrote:
不知道这是否暗示我做错了什么。
Don''t know if that''s a hint to what I''m doing wrong.




你''原则上,我没有做错任何事。你需要解决这个IE的缺点




对不起,我在上一篇文章中省略了我的相关网址,

所以这里是:

http://ppewww.ph.gla.ac.uk/~flavell /...ers-fonts.html


这篇关于IE字体使用问题......的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆