关于创建多媒体网页的问题 - 它们的必要性 [英] question about creating multi media web pages - their necessity

查看:88
本文介绍了关于创建多媒体网页的问题 - 它们的必要性的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

由于大多数人仍然在拨号或最多使用DSL(虽然这有* b $ b * IS *宽带)是否有助于或损害一个人的网页添加多媒体?

是否一定会分散网页的主题?我们准备好了吗?b $ b从静态网页转移到更流畅的网页?是否需要支付此举费用?
?费用是多少? ......带宽?

....开发? ......许可?


普遍的共识是什么? (我这样做是为了作业)

-


Woodzy
http://www.rtdos.com
http://rtdos.com/forum (rtdos留言板)
http://rtdos.com/rtdos (rtdos活跃的开发人员聊天)

http://rtdos.com/chat

每周日@ 7PM MDT安排聊天,每周日@ 1PM MDT预订

since a majority of people are still on dial up or at most DSL (though there
*IS* broadband) does it help or hurt one''s webpage adding multi media ?
does it necessarily distract from the theme of the webpage ? Are we ready
to move from static webpages to webpages that are more fluid ? Is it cost
that is prohibiting this move ? Cost of what ? ...bandwidth ?
....development ? ...licensing ?

What''s the general consensus ? (i''m doing this for an assignment)
--

Woodzy
http://www.rtdos.com
http://rtdos.com/forum (rtdos message boards)
http://rtdos.com/rtdos (rtdos active developer chat)

http://rtdos.com/chat
Chats scheduled every Thursday @ 7PM MDT and
every Sunday @ 1PM MDT

推荐答案

" * ProteanThread *" < SY *** @ rtdos.com>在消息中写道

news:f2 ****************************** @ news.teranew s。 com ...
"*ProteanThread*" <sy***@rtdos.com> wrote in message
news:f2******************************@news.teranew s.com...
因为大多数人仍在拨号或最多DSL(虽然
那里* IS *宽带)它是否有助于或伤害一个人的网页添加多个媒体?
它是否一定会分散网页的主题?我们准备好从静态网页转移到更流畅的网页吗?成本是否会阻止此举?费用是多少? ......带宽?
......发展? ......许可?

一般共识是什么? (我正在做这个任务)
since a majority of people are still on dial up or at most DSL (though there *IS* broadband) does it help or hurt one''s webpage adding multi media ?
does it necessarily distract from the theme of the webpage ? Are we ready
to move from static webpages to webpages that are more fluid ? Is it cost
that is prohibiting this move ? Cost of what ? ...bandwidth ?
...development ? ...licensing ?

What''s the general consensus ? (i''m doing this for an assignment)




IMO,首先关注网站需要使其生效:不要做什么

多媒体,除非需要使其有效;如果您可以将它放到

拨号用户,是否真的需要它?



IMO, focus first on what the site needs to make it effective: don''t do
multimedia unless needed to make it effective; and if you can drop it for
dial-up users, is it truly needed?


在文章< f2 * *****************************@news.teranews.co m> ;,
sy *** @ rtdos.com 启示我们...
In article <f2******************************@news.teranews.co m>,
sy***@rtdos.com enlightened us with...
因为大多数人仍在拨号或最多DSL(虽然有* * *宽带)是否有助于或损害一个人的网页添加多媒体?


这在很大程度上取决于页面内容和

提供多媒体内容的方式。

A没有多媒体下载,电影预览网站会很糟糕。一个没有Flash或Applets的游戏网站会很无聊。两者也将是主要由DSL或宽带用户使用的



所有在Flash中完成的主页都是浪费带宽。


如果网站不需要多媒体,为什么要使用多媒体?

它是否一定会分散网页的主题?


必要吗?不。但是,当我在拨号时,我确实讨厌所有页面都在Flash中完成了并且没有经常访问它们。点击流媒体视频打开

是一回事 - 使用嵌入式Flash强制多媒体

是另一回事。

我喜欢的网站是几乎所有的Flash,但我现在很享受它,因为我有
有宽带。我永远不会用拨号来访问。

我们准备好从静态网页转移到更流畅的网页吗?


这与多媒体关系不大。我有动态页面

与多媒体无关,所有与javascript有关

DHTML和/或服务器端动态生成。

成本是否禁止此举?费用是多少? ......带宽?
......发展? ......许可?
since a majority of people are still on dial up or at most DSL (though there
*IS* broadband) does it help or hurt one''s webpage adding multi media ?
That would highly depend on what the content of the page is and the
means of delivering the multimedia content.
A movie preview site would be pretty bad without multimedia downloads. A
game site would be boring without Flash or Applets. Both would also be
used primarily by people with DSL or broadband.
A homepage all done up in Flash is a waste of bandwidth.

If a site doesn''t need multimedia, why use it?
does it necessarily distract from the theme of the webpage ?
Necessarily? No. But when I was on dial-up, I sure hated pages all done
up in Flash and didn''t visit them often. Having streaming video open
with a click is one thing - forcing multimedia by using embedded Flash
is another.
A site I rather enjoy is almost all Flash, but I enjoy it now that I
have broadband. I would never visit with dial-up.
Are we ready
to move from static webpages to webpages that are more fluid ?
That has very little to do with multimedia. I have dynamic pages that
have nothing to do with multimedia and everything to do with javascript
DHTML and/or server-side dynamic generation.
Is it cost
that is prohibiting this move ? Cost of what ? ...bandwidth ?
...development ? ...licensing ?




什么招?人们没有宽带或没有使用多媒体的网站?

前者肯定是成本。后者是因为没有足够的人使用宽带来打扰。我的宽带费用是我的拨号费用的3倍以上,是最便宜的拨号费用的近5倍。如果我不得不削减家庭开支,那将是第一个去的。普通用户的优先列表并不是很高。


-

- < br $> b $ b~kaeli~

针灸是一种很好的做法。
http://www.ipwebdesign.net/wildAtHeart
http://www.ipwebdesign.net/kaelisSpace



What move? People not getting broadband or sites not using multimedia?
The former is cost, certainly. The latter is because not enough people
have broadband to bother. My broadband costs over 3 times what my dial-
up cost and nearly 5 times what the cheapest dial-up costs. If I had to
cut back on household expenses, it would be the first to go. It''s not
very high on the average user''s priority list.

--
--
~kaeli~
Acupuncture is a jab well done.
http://www.ipwebdesign.net/wildAtHeart
http://www.ipwebdesign.net/kaelisSpace


" kaeli" < TI ****** @ NOSPAM.comcast.net>在留言中写道

新闻:MP *********************** @ nntp.lucent.com ...
"kaeli" <ti******@NOSPAM.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:MP***********************@nntp.lucent.com...
文章< f2 ****************************** @ news.teranews.co m>,
sy***@rtdos.com 启发我们...
In article <f2******************************@news.teranews.co m>,
sy***@rtdos.com enlightened us with...
因为大多数人仍然在拨号或最多DSL(虽然
那里* IS *宽带)它是否有助于或伤害一个人的网页添加多媒体?
since a majority of people are still on dial up or at most DSL (though there *IS* broadband) does it help or hurt one''s webpage adding multi media ?



这将是高度取决于页面内容是什么以及提供多媒体内容的方式。
没有多媒体下载,电影预览网站会很糟糕。没有Flash或Applet,游戏网站会很无聊。两者也将主要由DSL或宽带用户使用。
所有在Flash中完成的主页都浪费带宽。

如果网站不需要多媒体,为什么要使用它?



That would highly depend on what the content of the page is and the
means of delivering the multimedia content.
A movie preview site would be pretty bad without multimedia downloads. A
game site would be boring without Flash or Applets. Both would also be
used primarily by people with DSL or broadband.
A homepage all done up in Flash is a waste of bandwidth.

If a site doesn''t need multimedia, why use it?

它是否一定会分散网页的主题?
does it necessarily distract from the theme of the webpage ?



必然吗?没有。但是当我在拨号时,我确实讨厌在Flash中完成所有页面并且没有经常访问它们。通过点击打开流媒体视频是一回事 - 使用嵌入式Flash强制多媒体
是另一回事。
我很喜欢的网站几乎都是Flash,但我现在很喜欢它<有宽带。我永远不会用拨号来访问。



Necessarily? No. But when I was on dial-up, I sure hated pages all done
up in Flash and didn''t visit them often. Having streaming video open
with a click is one thing - forcing multimedia by using embedded Flash
is another.
A site I rather enjoy is almost all Flash, but I enjoy it now that I
have broadband. I would never visit with dial-up.

我们准备好从静态网页转移到更流畅的网页吗?
Are we ready
to move from static webpages to webpages that are more fluid ?


DHTML和/或服务器端动态生成有关。



That has very little to do with multimedia. I have dynamic pages that
have nothing to do with multimedia and everything to do with javascript
DHTML and/or server-side dynamic generation.

是否需要花费
是否禁止此举?费用是多少? ......带宽?
......发展? ......许可?
Is it cost
that is prohibiting this move ? Cost of what ? ...bandwidth ?
...development ? ...licensing ?



什么举动?人们没有宽带或网站没有使用多媒体?
前者是成本,当然。后者是因为没有足够的人有宽带来打扰。我的宽带成本是我的拨号成本的3倍以上,是最便宜的拨号成本的近5倍。如果我不得不削减家庭开支,那将是第一个去的。对普通用户的优先列表来说,这并不是很高。

-
-
〜凯莉〜
针灸是jab做得很好。
http://www.ipwebdesign.net/wildAtHeart
http://www.ipwebdesign.net/kaelisSpace



但你是否同意开发工具的成本(从免费软件到方式


But would you agree that the cost of development tools (from freeware to way


这篇关于关于创建多媒体网页的问题 - 它们的必要性的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆