Oracle在技术上优于Ingres吗？ [英] is Oracle technically better than Ingres ?

问题描述

亲爱的数据库朋友，


在Ingres工作了13年后，我现在正在使用Oracle。


但是Oracle技术上比Ingres好。


如果有人能够解释上述

问题，我会非常感激。


如果你能''请''保持你的评论

技术水平也会有所帮助。


问候

Michael Newport

解决方案

mi ************ @ yahoo.com （michael newport）在留言中写道：< 63 *************** **********@posting.google.c om> ...

亲爱的数据库朋友，

Ingres 13年后，我现在正在使用甲骨文。

但甲骨文在技术上要优于安格尔。

如果有人能够对上述问题有所了解，我将非常感激。 。

如果你这也会有所帮助可以''请''在
技术层面上保留你的意见。

迈克尔纽波特

它我用INGRES做了很长时间，所以我不会说

它是好还是坏，因为我不知道它使用什么技术

现在。


我会说Oracle的Multiversioning使系统运行很多

比使用各种形式的锁的DBMS更顺畅控制访问。

它可能更耗资源，但易用性和性能

多补偿，恕我直言。


查看Oracle Concepts手册。你会学到很多关于

系统运作方式和原因。

HTH，

ed

" michael newport" < MI ************ @ yahoo.com>在消息中写道

news：63 ************************* @ posting.google.co m ... < blockquote class =post_quotes>亲爱的数据库朋友，

在Ingres工作了13年之后，我现在正在使用Oracle。

但是Oracle技术上优于Ingres 。

如果有人能对上述问题有所了解，我将非常感激。

如果你能请，这也会很有帮助。保持你的意见
技术水平。

任何实现SQL的东西都很糟糕。因此，您的问题是关于每种产品展示的每种程度的吮吸程度。这是一个艰难的。


我喜欢Ingres的管理方便。我喜欢Ingres DDL是

" transactional的事实。我喜欢轻松创建（并销毁）一个新的Ingres数据库。我喜欢轻松恢复和恢复

一个Ingres数据库。我也喜欢r3中很多内容的外观。


另一方面，我喜欢Oracle实现READ COMMITTED

隔离级别的方式。


正如我暗示的那样，我宁愿不必使用它们中的任何一个。但是Ingres是最糟糕的IMO。


Roy Hann（理光商城网上的rhann）

Rational Commerce Ltd. br /> www.rationalcommerce.com

" Ingres development ，调整和培训专家

mi ************ @ yahoo.com （michael newport）在留言中写道：< 63 *************** **********@posting.google.c om> ...

亲爱的数据库朋友，

Ingres 13年后，我现在正在使用甲骨文。

但甲骨文在技术上要优于安格尔。

如果有人能够对上述问题有所了解，我将非常感激。 。

如果您能够''请''将您的意见保持在技术水平上也会有所帮助。

问候
Michael Newport

迈克尔，我从来没有直接和Ingres一起工作过，但我们这里曾经有过

数据库，而且使用它的两位开发人员更喜欢使用它们。针对Oracle运行相同的应用程序

提供了更多的时间并且需要更少的数据库相关维护。


Oracle从此大大提升。有两种不同的独立咨询报告表明Oracle 10g比SQL Server更易于管理。


我有熟悉Oracle，SQL Server，DB2 UDB和mySQL。我比其他人更喜欢Oracle b $ b Oracle。我的第二个，Ed的建议是看看或者更好地阅读概念手册。这是开始的地方

甲骨文。


HTH - Mark D Powell -

Dear friends of database(s),

After 13 years of Ingres, I am now using Oracle.

But is Oracle technically better than Ingres.

I would be much obliged if anyone could shed some light on the above
question.

It would also be helpful if you could ''please'' keep your comments on a
technical level.

Regards
Michael Newport

解决方案

mi************@yahoo.com (michael newport) wrote in message news:<63*************************@posting.google.c om>...

Dear friends of database(s),

After 13 years of Ingres, I am now using Oracle.

But is Oracle technically better than Ingres.

I would be much obliged if anyone could shed some light on the above
question.

It would also be helpful if you could ''please'' keep your comments on a
technical level.

Regards
Michael Newport

It''s been a long time since I did anything with INGRES so I won''t say
it''s better or worse, because I don''t know what technology it uses
now.

I will say that Oracle''s Multiversioning makes systems run a lot
smoother than DBMS that uses various forms of locks to conrol access.
It can be more resource hungry, but the ease of use and performance
more than compensates, IMHO.

take a look at the Oracle Concepts manual. You''ll learn a lot about
how the system operates and why.

HTH,
ed

"michael newport" <mi************@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:63*************************@posting.google.co m...

Dear friends of database(s),

After 13 years of Ingres, I am now using Oracle.

But is Oracle technically better than Ingres.

I would be much obliged if anyone could shed some light on the above
question.

It would also be helpful if you could ''please'' keep your comments on a
technical level.

Anything that implements SQL sucks. Your question therefore is about the
degree of suckiness exhibited by each product. That''s a tough one.

I like Ingres'' ease of management. I like the fact that Ingres DDL is
"transactional". I like the ease with which I can create (and destroy) a
new Ingres database. I like the ease with which I can restore and recover
an Ingres database. I also like the look of a lot of what is coming in r3.

On the other hand I like the way Oracle implements the READ COMMITTED
isolation level.

As I implied, I''d rather not have to use either of them. But Ingres is the
least bad IMO.

Roy Hann (rhann at rationalcommerce dot com)
Rational Commerce Ltd.
www.rationalcommerce.com
"Ingres development, tuning, and training experts"

mi************@yahoo.com (michael newport) wrote in message news:<63*************************@posting.google.c om>...

Dear friends of database(s),

After 13 years of Ingres, I am now using Oracle.

But is Oracle technically better than Ingres.

I would be much obliged if anyone could shed some light on the above
question.

It would also be helpful if you could ''please'' keep your comments on a
technical level.

Regards
Michael Newport

Michael, I have never worked directly with Ingres, but we had the
database here once and the two developers who worked with it liked
Oracle much better. Running the same applications against Oracle
provided more up time and required less database related maintenance.

Oracle has advanced greatly since then. There are two different
independent consulting reports that state that Oracle 10g is easier to
manage than SQL Server.

I have wroked with Oracle, SQL Server, DB2 UDB, and mySQL. I like
Oracle better than the others. I second, Ed''s suggestion to look or
better yet read the Concepts manual. It is the place to start with
Oracle.

HTH -- Mark D Powell --

这篇关于Oracle在技术上优于Ingres吗？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！