Windows上的前端PC / Mac上的后端？ [英] Frontend on Windows PC/backend on a Mac?
问题描述
我几天前发布了一个关于运行不同版本的
访问前端与后端数据库的问题。得到了一些好的建议
但是现在我收到了这些信息：
我们目前正在运行AppleShare IP 6.3，这允许机器运行
Windows通过IP连接。
所以服务器的首选是Mac。如果需要，客户愿意购买一台
的Windows机器，但如果可能的话，我想使用现有的服务器。有人可以告诉我吗？如果
后端是在Mac上/没有运行Access，我的数据库可以运行吗？ （我最初的想法是不，那个
文件系统会有所不同）。
thx
Linda
I posted a question a couple of days ago about running different versions of
Access for the frontend versus the backend databases. Got some good advice
but now I''ve received this information:
"We are currently running AppleShare IP 6.3 and this allows machines running
Windows to connect via IP."
So the first choice of server is a Mac. The client is willing to buy a
Windows machine if necessary but would like to use an existing server if
possible. Could anyone advise me please? Could my database function if the
backend was on a Mac/not running Access? (My initial thought is no, that
the file systems would be different).
thx
Linda
推荐答案
Squirrel写道：
Squirrel wrote:
我几天前发布了一个关于运行不同版本
的问题访问前端与后端数据库。得到了一些好的建议
但现在我收到了这些信息：
我们目前正在运行AppleShare IP 6.3，这使得运行Windows的机器可以通过IP连接。
所以服务器的首选是Mac。如有必要，客户愿意购买Windows机器，但如果可能，则希望使用现有服务器。有人可以告诉我吗？如果
后端是在Mac上/没有运行Access，我的数据库可以运行吗？ （我最初的想法是否定的，文件系统会有所不同）。
I posted a question a couple of days ago about running different versions of
Access for the frontend versus the backend databases. Got some good advice
but now I''ve received this information:
"We are currently running AppleShare IP 6.3 and this allows machines running
Windows to connect via IP."
So the first choice of server is a Mac. The client is willing to buy a
Windows machine if necessary but would like to use an existing server if
possible. Could anyone advise me please? Could my database function if the
backend was on a Mac/not running Access? (My initial thought is no, that
the file systems would be different).
文件系统不应该打扰你。我的后端目前在unix
机器上。这很好，只要文件共享机制能够正常工作。
Mac应该在共享文件时支持smb协议。我不能确认是否确实如此。也许Apple网站可以告诉你更多。
-
Bas Cost Budde
http://www.heuveltop.nl/BasCB
File systems shouldn''t bother you. My backend currently is on a unix
machine. That is fine, as long as the file sharing mechanism does its work.
The Mac should support the smb protocol in sharing files. I can''t
remember whether it does. Maybe the Apple site can tell you more.
--
Bas Cost Budde
http://www.heuveltop.nl/BasCB
2004年2月5日星期四09:04:22 + 0100，Bas Cost Budde< ba*@heuveltop.org>写道：
On Thu, 05 Feb 2004 09:04:22 +0100, Bas Cost Budde <ba*@heuveltop.org> wrote:
Squirrel写道：
Squirrel wrote:
我几天前发布了一个关于运行不同版本的
访问前端与后端的问题数据库。得到了一些好的建议
但现在我收到了这些信息：
我们目前正在运行AppleShare IP 6.3，这使得运行Windows的机器可以通过IP连接。
所以服务器的首选是Mac。如有必要，客户愿意购买Windows机器，但如果可能，则希望使用现有服务器。有人可以告诉我吗？如果
后端是在Mac上/没有运行Access，我的数据库可以运行吗？ （我最初的想法是否定的，文件系统会有所不同。）
I posted a question a couple of days ago about running different versions of
Access for the frontend versus the backend databases. Got some good advice
but now I''ve received this information:
"We are currently running AppleShare IP 6.3 and this allows machines running
Windows to connect via IP."
So the first choice of server is a Mac. The client is willing to buy a
Windows machine if necessary but would like to use an existing server if
possible. Could anyone advise me please? Could my database function if the
backend was on a Mac/not running Access? (My initial thought is no, that
the file systems would be different).
文件系统不应该打扰你。我的后端目前在unix
机器上。这很好，只要文件共享机制能够正常工作。
Mac应该在共享文件时支持smb协议。我不能记得它是否确实如此。也许Apple网站可以告诉你更多信息。
File systems shouldn''t bother you. My backend currently is on a unix
machine. That is fine, as long as the file sharing mechanism does its work.
The Mac should support the smb protocol in sharing files. I can''t
remember whether it does. Maybe the Apple site can tell you more.
实际上，Access对其后端服务器有着非常挑剔的历史。
只有最精湛的最好的Netware工程师才能做到这一点，而且直到最近才开始，SAMBA也是一个禁区。 Squirrel要求使用
AppleShare，我不知道这是否会运作良好，但是有一个很好的
机会它不会。在OS X上，你可以运行SAMBA 2.x，甚至可能已经完成了它所做的事情，但是我对OS上的任何东西都不太确定。 />
9.
Actually, Access has a history of being very picky about its back-end server.
Only the fery best Netware engineers have ever made that work, and until
recently, SAMBA was pretty much a no-go, too. Squirrel is asking about using
AppleShare, and I don''t know if that will work well or not, but there''s a good
chance it won''t. On OS X, you can probably run SAMBA 2.x, and that might even
be what it''s doing by already, but I wouldn''t be too sure about anything on OS
9.
2004年2月4日星期三16:59:20 -0800 comp.databases.ms-access，
松鼠 <无线***** @ covad.net>写道：
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 16:59:20 -0800 in comp.databases.ms-access,
"Squirrel" <wi*****@covad.net> wrote:
我几天前发布了一个关于为前端和后端数据库运行不同版本的访问的问题。得到了一些好的建议
但现在我收到了这些信息：
我们目前正在运行AppleShare IP 6.3，这使得运行Windows的机器可以通过IP连接。
所以服务器的首选是Mac。如有必要，客户愿意购买Windows机器，但如果可能，则希望使用现有服务器。有人可以告诉我吗？如果
后端是在Mac上/没有运行Access，我的数据库可以运行吗？ （我最初的想法是否定的，文件系统会有所不同）。
I posted a question a couple of days ago about running different versions of
Access for the frontend versus the backend databases. Got some good advice
but now I''ve received this information:
"We are currently running AppleShare IP 6.3 and this allows machines running
Windows to connect via IP."
So the first choice of server is a Mac. The client is willing to buy a
Windows machine if necessary but would like to use an existing server if
possible. Could anyone advise me please? Could my database function if the
backend was on a Mac/not running Access? (My initial thought is no, that
the file systems would be different).
理论上，服务器上使用的文件系统应该不重要，因为它'这是工作站工作的
，例如你可以在
Linux ext2分区上有一个MDB文件。你的工作站并不知道差异，因为服务器使它看起来像一个网络盘，所以理论上（那个词再次是
）它应该是可能的，但在实践中，你可能会遇到
锁定问题，这里的ISTR人没有太多的运气
Linux / Samba。
-
A）bort，R）etry，I）用大锤子撞击。
In theory the filesystem used on the server should not matter as it''s
the workstation doing the work, e.g. you can have a MDB file on a
Linux ext2 partition. Your workstation doesn''t know the difference as
the server makes it look like a network disk so in theory (that word
again) it should be possible but in practice, you may experience
locking problems, ISTR people here not having much luck with
Linux/Samba.
--
A)bort, R)etry, I)nfluence with large hammer.
这篇关于Windows上的前端PC / Mac上的后端？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
