似乎OT;将证明相关性 [英] seems OT; will demonstrate relevance

查看:64
本文介绍了似乎OT;将证明相关性的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

Elsethread是对标识符的讨论。


有多少次你必须消灭高清并重新开始。我只是觉得

一直保持gcc在这里运行的方式,但多年来我已经忘记了我的abra

cadabras。


我需要autoexec.bat和config.sys的语句才能加载

mscdex.exe。 (我知道这个问题在其纯粹的冒失中看起来OT。给我一个

小绳子.MPJ


PS Allegro

Elsethread is a discussion of identifiers.

How many times have you had to wipe out a HD and start over. I just thought
of a way to keep gcc running all the time here, but I''ve forgotten my abra
cadabras over the years.

I need the statments for autoexec.bat and config.sys in order to load
mscdex.exe. (I know the question in its sheer temerity looks OT. Give me a
little rope. MPJ

P.S. Allegro

推荐答案



" Merrill& Michele"< be ******** @ comcast.net>写在留言中

news:v8 ******************** @ comcast.com ...

"Merrill & Michele" <be********@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:v8********************@comcast.com...
Elsethread是对标识符的讨论。

有多少次你不得不消灭高清并重新开始。我只想
想办法让gcc一直在这里运行,但我忘记了我的abra <多年来我一直在干扰。

我需要autoexec.bat和config.sys的语句才能加载
mscdex.exe。(我知道这个问题在于其纯粹的模特看起来OT。给我
a小绳子.MPJ
Elsethread is a discussion of identifiers.

How many times have you had to wipe out a HD and start over. I just thought of a way to keep gcc running all the time here, but I''ve forgotten my abra
cadabras over the years.

I need the statments for autoexec.bat and config.sys in order to load
mscdex.exe. (I know the question in its sheer temerity looks OT. Give me a little rope. MPJ




非常OT。你可以找到你想要的答案 www.msdn.microsoft.com


-Mike



Very OT. You can find the answers you seek at www.msdn.microsoft.com

-Mike


" Merrill&米歇尔" <是******** @ comcast.net>写道:
"Merrill & Michele" <be********@comcast.net> writes:
Elsethread是对标识符的讨论。

有多少次你必须消灭HD并重新开始。我只是想到了一种让gcc一直在这里运行的方法,但多年来我已经忘记了我的abra
cadabras。

我需要autoexec的声明.bat和config.sys以加载
mscdex.exe。 (我知道这个问题在其纯粹的冒失中看起来OT。给我一根小绳子.MPJ
PS Allegro
Elsethread is a discussion of identifiers.

How many times have you had to wipe out a HD and start over. I just thought
of a way to keep gcc running all the time here, but I''ve forgotten my abra
cadabras over the years.

I need the statments for autoexec.bat and config.sys in order to load
mscdex.exe. (I know the question in its sheer temerity looks OT. Give me a
little rope. MPJ

P.S. Allegro




为什么在发布问题之前,你没有证明相关性吗?

或者更好的是,只要在新闻组询问你的问题可能是什么?b $ b topical。但首先,你可能会考虑稍微提问一下

更连贯;我认为没有内部的一致性,更不用说与comp.lang.c.(Identifiers?gcc)相关的任何可能的b $ b。 autoexec.bat?

Allegro?嗯?)


-

Keith Thompson(The_Other_Keith) ks *** @ mib.org < http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>

圣地亚哥超级计算机中心< *>< http://users.sdsc.edu/~kst>

我们必须做点什么。这是事情。因此,我们必须这样做。



Why don''t you demonstrate the relevance *before* posting the question?
Or better yet, just ask in a newsgroup where your question might be
topical. But first, you might consider making your question a little
more coherent; I see no internal consistency, let alone any possible
relevance to comp.lang.c. (Identifiers? gcc? autoexec.bat?
Allegro? Huh??)

--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) ks***@mib.org <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
San Diego Supercomputer Center <*> <http://users.sdsc.edu/~kst>
We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this.




" Keith Thompson"< ks *** @ mib.org>在mes中写道圣人

新闻:ln ************ @ nuthaus.mib.org ...

"Keith Thompson" <ks***@mib.org> wrote in message
news:ln************@nuthaus.mib.org...
" Merrill&米歇尔" <是******** @ comcast.net>写道:
"Merrill & Michele" <be********@comcast.net> writes:
Elsethread是对标识符的讨论。

有多少次你必须消灭HD并重新开始。我只想
想办法让gcc一直在这里运行,但多年来我已经忘记了我的
abra cadabras。

我需要autoexec的声明.bat和config.sys以加载
mscdex.exe。 (我知道这个问题在其纯粹的冒失中看起来是OT。给我一个小小的绳子.MPJ

PS Allegro
Elsethread is a discussion of identifiers.

How many times have you had to wipe out a HD and start over. I just thought of a way to keep gcc running all the time here, but I''ve forgotten my abra cadabras over the years.

I need the statments for autoexec.bat and config.sys in order to load
mscdex.exe. (I know the question in its sheer temerity looks OT. Give me a little rope. MPJ

P.S. Allegro



为什么不你在发布问题之前证明了相关性吗?
或者更好的是,只要在新闻组中询问你的问题可能是什么话题。但首先,你可以考虑提出你的问题
更连贯;我认为没有内部一致性,更不用说与comp.lang.c.(Identifiers?gcc?autoexec.bat?
Allegro?嗯??)



Why don''t you demonstrate the relevance *before* posting the question?
Or better yet, just ask in a newsgroup where your question might be
topical. But first, you might consider making your question a little
more coherent; I see no internal consistency, let alone any possible
relevance to comp.lang.c. (Identifiers? gcc? autoexec.bat?
Allegro? Huh??)



你赢了。我没有证明相关性,ergo OT.MPJ


You win. I shan''t demonstrate relevance, ergo OT. MPJ


这篇关于似乎OT;将证明相关性的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆