包括JavaScript？ [英] Include JavaScript??
问题描述
我的< HEAD>中有一个相当长的JavaScript < / HEAD>部分。我想将这个javaScript放在另一个文件中，然后将其包含在内。是
那可能是什么，应该只调用包含javascript的文件？
I have a rather long JavaScript in my <HEAD> </HEAD> part. I would like to
put this javaScript in another file and then just include it instead. Is
that possible and what should files containing only javascript be called??
推荐答案
JS写道：
我的< HEAD>中有一个相当长的JavaScript < / HEAD>部分。我想把这个javaScript放在另一个文件中然后只包含它。这是可能的吗？应该只调用包含javascript的文件？
I have a rather long JavaScript in my <HEAD> </HEAD> part. I would like to
put this javaScript in another file and then just include it instead. Is
that possible and what should files containing only javascript be called??
< script type = text / javascript src = myJSFile.js>< / script>
< / script>很重要：一些旧的浏览器不理解/>，
并且需要关闭某种类型。
JavaScript文件最好以a命名。 js扩展。
<script type=text/javascript src=myJSFile.js></script>
The </script> is important: some older browsers will not understand />,
and a closing of some kind is required.
JavaScript files are best named with a .js extension.
2005年5月30日10:41，Random写道：
On 30/05/2005 10:41, Random wrote:
< script type = text / javascript src = myJSFile.js>< / script>
type属性包含斜杠，因此必须引用它。 src
属性不需要在上面显示的代码段中引用，但是这样做没有伤害。
< /脚本>很重要
当然。 SCRIPT元素需要关闭标签。
一些旧浏览器不理解/> ;, [...]
这是因为它创造了HTML是乱码。我知道你推断了XHTML的使用，但是无论如何这在网上是不可行的。
此外，非空元素的元素最小化是不允许通过XHTML 1.0获得
- 附录C（虽然该部分仅提供信息）。
JavaScript文件最好以.js扩展名命名。
<script type=text/javascript src=myJSFile.js></script>
The type attribute contains a slash, so it must be quoted. The src
attribute doesn''t need to be quoted in snippet shown above, but there is
no harm in doing so.
The </script> is important
Of course. Closing tags are required for SCRIPT elements.
some older browsers will not understand />, [...]
That''s because it creates HTML that is gibberish. I know you''re
inferring the use of XHTML, but that isn''t viable on the Web anyway.
Moreover, element minimisation for non-empty elements is not permitted
by XHTML 1.0 - Appendix C (though that section is only informative).
JavaScript files are best named with a .js extension.
除非服务器配置不同，否则它们应始终以.js扩展名命名为
，否则正确的内容类型将不会是
发送。
迈克
-
Michael Winter
替换"。无效"与.uk通过电子邮件回复。
Unless the server has been configured differently, they should always be
named with a .js extension otherwise the correct content type will not
be sent.
Mike
--
Michael Winter
Replace ".invalid" with ".uk" to reply by e-mail.
Michael Winter写道：
Michael Winter wrote:
On 30/05/2005 10:41，Random写道：
On 30/05/2005 10:41, Random wrote:
< script type = text / javascript src = myJSFile.js>< / script>
type属性包含斜杠，因此必须引用它。 src
属性不需要在上面显示的片段中引用，但这样做没有任何害处。
<script type=text/javascript src=myJSFile.js></script>
The type attribute contains a slash, so it must be quoted. The src
attribute doesn''t need to be quoted in snippet shown above, but there is
no harm in doing so.
通话我是一个极简主义者。我从来没有见过一个需要
报价的浏览器 - 即使是Lynx也会理解裸字，斜线或斜线。
击中那个该死的报价键经常会受伤我的小指。
Call me a minimalist. I''ve never seen a single browser that needed
quotes on it-- even Lynx understands barewords, slash or no slash.
Hitting that damned quote key so often hurts my pinky.
< / script>很重要
The </script> is important
当然。 SCRIPT元素需要关闭标签。
Of course. Closing tags are required for SCRIPT elements.
继续，真的吗？
Go on, really?
一些旧浏览器无法理解/> ，[...]
some older browsers will not understand />, [...]
那是因为它创造了乱码的HTML。我知道你推断了XHTML的使用，但无论如何这在网上是不可行的。
此外，XHTML不允许非空元素的元素最小化。 1.0 - 附录C（虽然该部分仅提供信息）。
That''s because it creates HTML that is gibberish. I know you''re
inferring the use of XHTML, but that isn''t viable on the Web anyway.
Moreover, element minimisation for non-empty elements is not permitted
by XHTML 1.0 - Appendix C (though that section is only informative).
幸运或不幸的是，一些较新的浏览器支持最小化
，即使在HTML中也是如此。因此区分。
Fortunately or unfortunately, some newer browsers do support minimising
even in HTML. Hence the distinguishment.
JavaScript文件最好用.js扩展名命名。
JavaScript files are best named with a .js extension.
除非服务器配置不同，否则它们应始终以.js扩展名命名，否则将无法发送正确的内容类型。
Unless the server has been configured differently, they should always be
named with a .js extension otherwise the correct content type will not
be sent.
这就是为什么使用.js
扩展名是最好的，但不是必需的。
你有什么有用的东西可以在这里添加，温特先生？
Which is why it is best, but not necessarily required, to use a .js
extension.
Did you have something helpful to add here, Mr. Winter?
这篇关于包括JavaScript？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
