.NET最终会占用吗？ [英] Is .NET finally taking of?
问题描述
这个.NET的东西在商业上存在了1年我相信。
很多书籍和杂志谈论这个.NET
但到目前为止我只遇到过一个需要这个.NET的应用程序。
即使是微软制作的程序都还在使用非NET技术。
所以你认为这个.NET实际上会变得流行吗？
微软是否真的开始创建一个.NET版本的互联网
资源管理器和Windows的其他部分？
This .NET thing exists commercially for 1 year now I believe.
A lot of books and magazines talk about this .NET
But so far I only encountered 1 application that needed this .NET.
Even the programs made by Microsoft all are still using none-NET technology.
So do you think that this .NET would actually become popular?
Is Microsoft actually starting to create an .NET version of Internet
Explorer and other parts of Windows?
推荐答案
< Ol ********** @skyscan.be>在消息中写道
<Ol**********@skyscan.be> wrote in message
那么你认为这个.NET真的会变得流行吗？
我们从一开始就知道
人需要花一些时间才能切换。将它与Windows 16位转换为Windows 32位的b
进行比较。即使在今天，仍有一些人仍在使用16位Windows应用程序。
Microsoft实际上是否开始创建.NET版本的Internet
Explorer
重写一个非常好的应用程序只是因为它没有经济意义上的b / b
。所以他们不会这样做。
IE也是一个不好的例子，因为版本6将是最后一个独立的
版本。
Windows的其他部分？
So do you think that this .NET would actually become popular?
We all knew from the beginning that it was going to take some time for
people to switch over. Compare it to the transition of Windows 16-bit to
Windows 32-bit. Even today, some people are still using 16-bit Windows apps.
Is Microsoft actually starting to create an .NET version of Internet
Explorer
Rewriting a perfectly good application just for the heck of it doesn''t make
economical sense. So they won''t do that.
IE is also a bad example, because version 6 will be the last standalone
version.
and other parts of Windows?
资源管理器[不要与Internet Explorer混淆]下一版本的
Windows将是一个。 NET应用程序，其中包括。
问候，
Pieter Philippaerts
托管SSL / TLS： http://www.mentalis.org/go.php?sl
更不用说VS.NET了。我相信它是用C＃编写的。
Not to mention VS.NET. I believe it was written in C#.
>>所以你认为这个.NET实际上会变得流行吗？
>> So do you think that this .NET would actually become popular?
我们从一开始就知道
人们需要一些时间切换。将其与Windows 16位转换为Windows 32位进行比较。即使在今天，仍有一些人仍在使用16位Windows
We all knew from the beginning that it was going to take some time for
people to switch over. Compare it to the transition of Windows 16-bit to
Windows 32-bit. Even today, some people are still using 16-bit Windows
应用程序。
到目前为止，我看到了很多书籍，杂志评论，代码示例，但使用.NET的实际程序并不多。
也许是因为哈希尔如果你必须支持多个
语言版本，那么在一个安装文件中安装.NET框架无法轻松完成。
另一个大问题是，当你分发一个应用程序，然后你得到非常好的b / b奇怪的错误，找不到的dll，文件打开的盒子没有运行，
在允许运行之前首先必须将其编写到本地驱动器的代码....
所有这些都是因为增加了网络安全功能。我喜欢这些新的
的东西，但要理解这一切并不是那么容易。
apps.
So far I see a lot of books, magazine reviews, code examples but not much
real programs using .NET.
Maybe it is because of the hassel of installing the .NET framework that
cannot be easily done in one setup file if you must support multiple
language versions.
Another big problem is when you distribute an applicaton, then you get very
strange errors, dll''s that are not found, file Open boxes that does not run,
code that first must be comied to a local drive before it allows to run....
All because of this increased net security functionality. I love these new
things, but it is not that eaasy to understand all of this.
微软是否真的开始了创建一个.NET版本的Internet
Explorer
Is Microsoft actually starting to create an .NET version of Internet
Explorer
重写一个非常好的应用程序只是因为它没有
Rewriting a perfectly good application just for the heck of it doesn''t
具有经济意义。所以他们不会这样做。
将有一段混合应用程序使用托管/非托管
代码。
make economical sense. So they won''t do that.
There will be a period of mixed applications that uses managed/unmanaged
code.
和Windows的其他部分？
and other parts of Windows?
资源管理器[不要与Internet Explorer混淆]下一个版本
Explorer [do not confuse that with Internet Explorer] of the next version
的Windows将是一个.NET应用程序，其中包括。
of Windows will be a .NET application, amongst others.
Internet Explorer将是一个很好的移植到.NET，因为它会停止
更多vunerabilities。
特别是所有可以通过互联网接收的核心组件将是开始移植到.NET的良好一步。
但这需要一些时间。学习曲线再次设置了一点点
更高。
Internet Explorer would be a nice thing to port to .NET since it would stop
some more vunerabilities.
Especially all core components that can be accesed by Internet would be a
good step forward in start porting to .NET.
But this will take some time. The learning curve have set again a little bit
higher.
这篇关于.NET最终会占用吗？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
