有[可序列化]和[序列化（）在C＃中有区别吗？ [英] is there a difference between [Serializable] and [Serializable()] in c#?

问题描述

我已经碰到了使用任何两个符号的例子。我找不到它的任何事情告诉哪一个是常见的一种，为什么2符号是允许的，如果有实际两者之间的细微差别。

I've bumped into examples using either of both notations. I can't find anything about it what tells which one is the common one, why 2 notations are allowed, and if there is actually any subtle difference between the two.

任何人的想法？

推荐答案

不，没有任何功能上的差异。

Nope, no functional difference.

为什么两种不同的风格，你问？所述第一符号是允许为了简便起见。第二符号是允许的，因为某些属性取参数：

Why the 2 different styles, you ask? The first notation is allowed for brevity. The 2nd notation is allowed because some attributes take parameters:

[Category("Foobar related methods.")]
public void Foo()
{
}

另外请注意，[Serializable接口]实际上只是短期的手[SerializableAttribute（）] - C＃，您可以省略属性后缀以及空构造括号

Also note that [Serializable] is really just short-hand for [SerializableAttribute()] - C# lets you omit the Attribute suffix as well as the empty constructor parens.

这篇关于有[可序列化]和[序列化（）在C＃中有区别吗？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！