为什么*((int *)pd)一旦pd + = 4就重置为零? [英] Why *((int*)pd) is reseeting to zero once pd+=4 ?
本文介绍了为什么*((int *)pd)一旦pd + = 4就重置为零?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!
问题描述
class Test
{
// The unsafe keyword allows pointers to be used within
// the following method:
static unsafe void Copy(byte[] src, int srcIndex,
byte[] dst, int dstIndex, int count)
{
if (src == null || srcIndex < 0 ||
dst == null || dstIndex < 0 || count < 0)
{
throw new ArgumentException();
}
int srcLen = src.Length;
int dstLen = dst.Length;
if (srcLen - srcIndex < count ||
dstLen - dstIndex < count)
{
throw new ArgumentException();
}
// The following fixed statement pins the location of
// the src and dst objects in memory so that they will
// not be moved by garbage collection.
fixed (byte* pSrc = src, pDst = dst)
{
byte* ps = pSrc;
byte* pd = pDst;
// Loop over the count in blocks of 4 bytes, copying an
// integer (4 bytes) at a time:
for (int n =0 ; n < count/4 ; n++)
{
*((int*)pd) = *((int*)ps);
pd += 4;
ps += 4;
}
// Complete the copy by moving any bytes that weren't
// moved in blocks of 4:
for (int n =0; n < count%4; n++)
{
*pd = *ps;
pd++;
ps++;
}
}
}
static void Main(string[] args)
{
byte[] a = new byte[100];
byte[] b = new byte[100];
for(int i=0; i<100; ++i)
a[i] = (byte)i;
Copy(a, 0, b, 0, 100);
Console.WriteLine("The first 10 elements are:");
for(int i=0; i<10; ++i)
Console.Write(b[i] + " ");
Console.WriteLine("\n");
}
}
我的尝试:
我试图调试但不明白为什么*((int *)pd)重置为零
从他的链接下面获得
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa288474(v=vs.71).aspx
What I have tried:
I tried to debug but did not understand why *((int*)pd) is resetting to zero
got fromt he below link
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa288474(v=vs.71).aspx
推荐答案
没有什么是重置 。
在此表达式中,不会修改任何内存部分。根据你的声明,pd
是一个指向byte的指针;所以pd + = 4
给你另一个向前移动4个字节的指针。它恰好发生了另外4个字节(int
的大小),类型转换指针指向的内存,它用零填充。使用调试器,你会看到。
顺便说一下,在你的代码中,我看不到使用unsafe $ c $的真实理由c>和指针。
-SA
Nothing is "resetting".
In this expression, no part of memory is modified. According to your declaration,pd
is a pointer to byte; sopd += 4
gives you another pointer which is shifted forward by 4 bytes. It just so happened that another 4 bytes (size ofint
), the memory where the type-casted pointer points, it filled with zeros. Use the debugger and you will see.
By the way, in your code I cannot see real justification for usingunsafe
and pointers.
—SA
这篇关于为什么*((int *)pd)一旦pd + = 4就重置为零?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!
查看全文