在开发静态代码分析器时应该使用哪种方法？ [英] which methodology should be used in developing static code analyzer?

问题描述

我有一个项目，我正在研究所以我遇到了不同类型的开发方法，在选择项目方法时，这对我来说非常头疼，因为一切似乎都适合。



谁能告诉我哪一个主要用于开发各种项目？

解决方案

否。

问题是方法论要么适合 - 在这种情况下它们可能会被使用，或者它们不适合 - 在这种情况下它们可能会被使用，因为开发人员熟悉方法并使其工作，即使它不是最好的。



我们不能说这是'X'类型的项目，所以使用方法'Y'因为'X'的定义'项目的类型不是'静态代码分析器'，它与它如何工作，它将如何呈现给用户，以及其他一系列因素有关 - 并且有许多不同的方式来编写静态代码分析器代码肛门yzer因为有开发人员试图写它们！



看看这个： http://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/CMS-Information-Technology/XLC /Downloads/SelectingDevelopmentApproach.pdf [ ^ ]和： http://www.icbl.hw.ac.uk/ltdi/cookbook/preparation/selecting.html [ ^ ]和谷歌的选择开发方法 [ ^ ]看看有多少不同的想法如何选择一个有！

I have a project which I am working on so I came across different types of development methodology when it comes to selecting a project methodology it quite a headache for me because all seems to fit.

Can anyone tell me which one is mostly used to develop the kinds of projects ?

解决方案

No.
The trouble is that methodologies either fit - in which case they may well be used, or they don't fit - in which case they will probably be used anyway because the developer is familiar with the methodology and get get it to work, even if it isn't the best.

We can't say "It's 'X' type of project, so use methodology 'Y'" because the definition of 'X' type of project isn't 'static code analyzer' it's to do with how it's going to work, how it's going to present to the user, a huge range of other factors - and there are as many different ways to write "a static code analyzer" as there are developers trying to write them!

Have a look at this: http://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/CMS-Information-Technology/XLC/Downloads/SelectingDevelopmentApproach.pdf[^] and this: http://www.icbl.hw.ac.uk/ltdi/cookbook/preparation/selecting.html[^] and google for choosing a developement methodology[^] to see how many different idea on how to pick one there are!

这篇关于在开发静态代码分析器时应该使用哪种方法？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！