3D游戏,3d应用程序有什么好处:C#WPF vs HTML / CSS / Javascript? [英] What is good for 3d games, 3d applications: C# WPF vs HTML/CSS/Javascript?

查看:60
本文介绍了3D游戏,3d应用程序有什么好处:C#WPF vs HTML / CSS / Javascript?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我知道还有很多其他的东西,但

我们只比较2个,而不是其他引擎,只有这2个:



1. C#WPF。

2. HTML / CSS / Javascript。



什么有更高的渲染性能?

I know there are lots of other stuff, but
we compare only the 2 ones, not other engines, only these 2 ones:

1. C# WPF.
2. HTML/CSS/Javascript.

What has higher render performance?

推荐答案

我在这里引用来自Telerik的Georgi的回答:

I cite you here a answer from Georgi from Telerik:
Quote:

两种技术(C#/ XAML和HTML)在UI响应性和性能方面都表现得非常接近。有一些细微的差别,但根据我们的经验,为每个平台制作组件,我们可以说差异是微不足道的。话虽如此,选择您感觉更舒服的平台取决于您和您的技能。

Both technologies (C#/XAML & HTML) perform close regarding UI responsiveness and performance. There are some slight differences but from our experience, making components for each platform, we may say that the differences are insignificant. With that said, it is up to you and your skills to choose the platform that you feel more comfortable with.



因此,如果您选择在WPF和HTML之间(并且如上所述)选项是二年级),而不是根据你的知识选择......

什么可能使HTML成为最受欢迎的是有几个3D(JavaScript)引擎可以帮助你更快地开始(我不知道)一个WPF特定的3D引擎... ...


So if your choice is between WPF and HTML (and as noted both these options are second grade) than you should choose according your knowledge...
What may make HTML a favorite is that there are several 3D (JavaScript) engines that may help you start faster (I do not know a WPF specific engine of 3D)...


这篇关于3D游戏,3d应用程序有什么好处:C#WPF vs HTML / CSS / Javascript?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆