Https自签名证书显示Https不信任为什么？ [英] Https Self Signed Certificate Shows Https not trusted why?

问题描述

https 显示并要求安装或移动到不同的位置

显示喜欢的东西不好请告诉我该怎么办？

https shows and ask for install or moves to different location
It showing Like something is not good please tell me what to do?

推荐答案

如果签名页面由您自己或了解您并且知道您的证书的人使用（例如，如果您亲自递交了公钥或公钥令牌），则自签名证书就可以了。并说这是我的，可以信任）。这样，没有人可以欺骗你的网站;你的朋友可以检查一下。到目前为止一切都那么好。



但是，如果某个用户看到该网站代表您的组织并且需要一些确凿的证据证明您的声明。好的，这个人可以检查证书，但证据怎么样？正如您应该了解的那样，其他人可以自签一些其他证书（与您完全一样），并假装他的恶意网站代表您的组织。如何区分？



证书颁发机构的用途。请参阅：

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Certificate_authority [< a href =http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Certificate_authoritytarget =_ blanktitle =New Window> ^ ]，

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_certificate [ ^ ]，

http ：//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_signature [ ^ ]，

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public-key_cryptography [ ^ ]。

-SA

Self-signed certificate is just fine if the signed page is used by yourself or people who know you and know your certificate (for example, if you personally handed them its public key or public key token and say "this is mine, can be trusted"). This way, no one can spoof your site; your friends can check it up. So far so good.

But how about some user who sees that the site represents your organization and needs some firm evidence of your statement. Okay, this person can check up the certificate, but how can be the evidence? As you should understand, someone else could self-sign some other certificate (exactly the same way you did) and pretend that his malicious site represents your organization. How to tell the difference?

That what the certificate authorities are for. Please see:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Certificate_authority[^],
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_certificate[^],
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_signature[^],
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public-key_cryptography[^].

—SA

这篇关于Https自签名证书显示Https不信任为什么？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！