递归地实现lambdas [英] implement lambdas recursively
问题描述
如何递归地实现lambas。
how to implement lambas recursively.
推荐答案
解决方案1非常好但是它留下了一个漏洞的错误。
这取决于递归调用绑定到名称factorialValue
。
如果被泄露它就会崩溃。
非常人为的例子:
Solution 1 is pretty good but it leaves a vulnerability for error.
It depends on the binding to the namefactorialValue
for the recursive call.
If were compromised it falls apart.
Very contrived example:
Func<int, int> Factorial = null;
Factorial = x => (x <= 0) ? 1 : x * Factorial(x - 1);
Func<int, int> incorrectFactorial = Factorial;
Factorial = x => x;
int ans = incorrectFactorial(5);
由于重新分配了标识符<$ c $,因此 ans
的值为20 c> Factorial 。
绑定递归方法的名称需要保护:
The value of ans
here is 20 because of the reassignment of the identifier Factorial
.
The name binding the recursive method needs to be protected:
Func<int, int> Factorial = null;
Factorial = x => {
Func<int, int> internalFactorial = null;
internalFactorial = xi => (xi <= 0) ? 1 : xi * internalFactorial(xi - 1);
return internalFactorial(x);
};
Func<int, int> otherFactorial = Factorial;
Factorial = x => x;
int ans = otherFactorial(5);
这里 ans
的值是正确的120,因为递归标识符是范围内部的of lambda。
另一种方法是使用一个方法返回 Func< int,int>
:
Here the value of ans
is the correct 120 because the recursion identifier was internal to the scope of the lambda.
Another way to accomplish this would be to have a method that returns a Func<int, int>
:
static Func<int, int> GetFactorialFunction()
{
Func<int, int> Factorial = null;
Factorial = x => (x <= 0) ? 1 : x * Factorial(x - 1);
return Factorial;
}
并调用返回的函数:
and invoke the returned function:
int ans = GetFactorialFunction()(5);
Of当然,此时使用lambda 可能是多余的,因为函数可以直接实现为命名的递归函数。
Of course, at this point using a lambda is probably superfluous since the function could be implemented directly as a named, recursive function.
可以递归地实现lambda。
试试这个例子
Its possible to implement lambda recursively.
Try this as an example
Func<int, int> factorialValue = null;
factorialValue = x => (x == 0) ? 1 : x * factorialValue(x - 1);
这篇关于递归地实现lambdas的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!