同步_tracking记录但不是数据行 [英] Syncs _tracking record but not data row

查看:53
本文介绍了同步_tracking记录但不是数据行的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

使用SF 2.1

我遇到了一个奇怪且不一致的错误。 有时,当我配置一个额外的范围时,它将同步跟踪记录而不是实际数据记录。

I am experiencing a strange and inconsistent bug.  Sometimes when I provision an additional scope it will sync the tracking records but not the actual data records.

场景。 我为数据库配置了几个范围,每个范围包含几个单独的表。 我同步数据库。 没问题,一切都很好。 然后,我提供了一些额外的几个范围,这些范围包含一些与
第一组范围相同的表,但具有不同的过滤器参数。 这次我同步时拉出自己的_tracking记录并将它们同步到客户端数据库中,但它不会复制实际数据表中的记录... ???

Scenario.  I provision a database with several scopes containing several separate tables each.  I sync the database.  No problems, all is well.  I then provision an additional few scopes that contain some of the same tables as in the first set of scopes, but with different filter parameters.  This time when I sync it pulls own the _tracking records and syncs those into the client database, but it doesn't copy the records in the actual data tables...???

这个但并不总是会发生。 它大部分时间都应该工作,但是它时不时地以这种方式运行,我无法建立任何导致这种行为的模式。 

This doesn't always happen though.  It works most of the time as it should, but every now and then it behaves in this way and I have not been able to establish any pattern whatsoever for what leads to this behavior. 

还有其他人遇到过这种情况吗?

Anybody else experience this?

推荐答案

您是否为同一个表中的其他范围指定了CreateProceduresForAdditionalScope?默认值是CreateOrUseExisting,我已经看到这种情况发生在同一个表的另一个范围指向相同的SelectChanges sp
have you specified CreateProceduresForAdditionalScope for the additional scope on the same table? The default is CreateOrUseExisting and I have seen this happen where an additional scope for the same table is pointing to the same SelectChanges sp


这篇关于同步_tracking记录但不是数据行的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆