VS 2012 Visual C ++ MFC让它变得更好,是否值得使用? [英] VS 2012 Visual C++ MFC has it gotten any better and is it worth using?

查看:74
本文介绍了VS 2012 Visual C ++ MFC让它变得更好,是否值得使用?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我正在开始一个新项目,我真的不想使用C#和.net。我想回到C ++,但我还没有升级到2012,但我的最后一个版本是VS 2008.我在问是否有任何理由升级到2012年,如果MFC失去了一些重量并且会值得使用。我过去使用过WTL,但它似乎在三年前就已经死了。任何见解将不胜感激。谢谢!

I''m starting a new project and I really don''t want to use C# and .net. I want to go back to C++ but I haven''t upgraded to 2012 yet the last version I have is VS 2008. I''m asking if there is any good reason to upgrade to 2012 and if MFC has lost some weight and would be worth using. I used WTL in the past but it seems to have died about three years ago. Any insight would be appreciated. Thanks!

推荐答案

我从1994年左右开始使用上述所有内容,如果今天必须创建一个C ++项目来为自己做一些事情(或者类似的话)没有平台/框架/库的边界)我会用MFC来做。很多人都认为旧的东西已经过时了,我不遵循。 MFC确实有它的瑕疵,但它很受欢迎,很有用,其中很多东西都是正确的。



我的感觉是MFC将比其目前的微软竞争对手名单更长寿(即原生C ++,ATL,WTL,C ++ / CLI,......)。
I''ve used all of the above since about 1994, and if I had to create a C++ project today to do something for myself (or similarly without boundaries on platform/framework/libraries) I would do it with MFC. A lot of people have the religion that something that is old is obsolete, which I do not follow. MFC indeed has its warts, but it is popular, useful and many things in it are done right.

My feeling is that MFC will outlive its current list of Microsoft competitors (ie. native C++, ATL, WTL, C++/CLI, ...).


这篇关于VS 2012 Visual C ++ MFC让它变得更好,是否值得使用?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆