WCF V.S.传统的ASP.Net Web服务 [英] WCF v.s. legacy ASP.Net Web Services

问题描述

可能重复：
   Web服务和mdash; WCF与标准

任何人都可以推荐我一些文件，以说明为什么WCF是比传统的ASP.NET Web服务的更好？我在性能和安全性特别感兴趣。

---

Could anyone recommend me some documents to describe why WCF is better than legacy ASP.NET web services? I am especially interested in performance and security.

推荐答案

WCF是更灵活的：

• 可以在HTTP上使用（如传统的ASMX）

• 也：可以反复使用NetTCP，MSMQ，wsHttp等等

• can be used over HTTP (like legacy ASMX)

• but also: can be used over NetTCP, MSMQ, wsHttp and so on

WCF服务可以在IIS托管（如传统的ASMX）

WCF services can be hosted in IIS (like legacy ASMX)

但WCF服务还可以自承载在一个控制台应用程序，Windows NT的服务，等等。

but WCF services can also be self-hosted in a console app, Windows NT Service, etc.

WCF提供了更多的安全功能和安全水平比ASMX（信息安全等。）

WCF offers a lot more security features and security levels than ASMX (message security etc.)

在WCF，几乎所有的东西是在配置文件中配置的 - 远远超过了与ASMX

In WCF, almost anything is configurable in a config file - much more so than with ASMX.

我没有任何现成的文件在手，描述这个 - 但是这真的是它的精髓，我想说

I don't have any ready-made documents at hand that describe this - but that's really the essence of it, I'd say.

马克·

PS：不知道这人会包含任何对您有用：

PS: Not sure if this one would contain anything useful for you:

的http://whitepapers.techrepublic.com/abstract.aspx?kw=remoting&docid=270830

PPS：你的认为的，微软将有这些白皮书堆说服人 - 但没有..... :-)

PPS: you would think that Microsoft would have heaps of these white papers to convince folks - but no..... :-)

这篇关于WCF V.S.传统的ASP.Net Web服务的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！