减轻“标记为答案”滥用 [英] Mitigating "Mark as Answer" Abuse
问题描述
线程如
这一个让我想知道当前的系统是否对这种类型的滥用行为开放，通过重复地将提问者的非回答答复标记为答案。
也许论坛所有者会想要一个功能，如果提问者发布的回复被标记为回答，则会输入一些"等待审核"。状态，如果主持人确认这是一个真正的答案，真的会成为答案。
没有。我只是看到你滥用论坛系统来标记"对任何事情都没有真正回答的回复"。作为答案。
如果答案的数量可以用来反映用户帐户的责任，至少应该使其变得更公平。
你可能不喜欢这里的主持人，虽然我发现它们会标记一些回复并不能令人满意地回答（我认为这是可以原谅的，因为论坛中的帖子量很大。我不会在这里放置名字，这是可以理解的一些mods将
作为答案回复"链接MSDN /其他论坛的答案"作为答案。在这种情况下，线程参与者有责任检查标记的答案，看看答案是否真的回答了因为我们必须查看更少的帖子，并且通过回复帖子
，我们已经表达了对这个问题的兴趣。我们必须这样做，以确保有最好的质量答案，我们可以尝试互联网。至少我没有看到一个案例，他们标记的东西不是
技术在技术论坛上回答。
Threads such as this one makes me wonder whether the current system is open for this type of abuse, by repetitively marking non-answer replies by asker as answer.
Maybe the forum owners will want a feature that, if a reply posted by asker is marked as answer, it would be entering some "waiting for review" status, and really become an answer if a moderator confirms it's really an answer.
No. I just see that you abuse the forum system to mark "replies that is not really answer to anything" as answer.
If the number of answer somehow could be used to reflect the accountability of an user account, at least it should be made to be fairer.
You may not like the moderators here, while sometmes I do find them mark some replies that's not satisfactory to be answer (I think this is forgivable due to the volume of posts in the forums. I won't put names here, it's understandable some mods will take replies "linking MSDN / some other forum's answer" as answer. On such case it would be the responsibility of thread participaters to check the marked answer to see if the reply really answered the question as we have to view much fewer thread, and by replying to a thread, we've expressed interest to the question. We must do so to make sure there's best quality answers and we could try to have on the internet. ), at least I haven't seen a single case that they mark something that's not technical as answer on a technical forum.
这篇关于减轻“标记为答案”滥用的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
