不值得写 [英] Not worth to write

问题描述

因为在一位主持人中有两个人拒绝谈论悲伤的历史和我的国家（欧盟）的权利，所以我已经从这个帖子中删除了这条消息和我的所有消息。我的消息中没有包含"大屠杀"这个词。

Because the the right to speak about the sad history and of my country (the EU) is denied by two persons among one moderator I've removed this message and all my messages from this thread. My message did not contain the word Holocaust.

推荐答案

我不认为指出谁标记它是滥用的并不是一个好主意，因为它会阻止它的使用。我发现它没有被过度使用。即使一个人过度使用它，他们的历史也会显示出来。指出
为什么它被标记为滥用，但是，这将是一个很好的主意。

I do not think that pointing out who marked it abusive is not a good idea as it would discourage its use. I do not find it to be overused. Even if a single person did overuse it, their history would show it. Pointing out why it was marked abusive, however, would be an excellent idea.

无论如何，将帖子标记为滥用的重点是指出主持人。最终，主持人应该做出决定并删除消息或删除它的滥用标记（或者有一个特殊的已被判断为非滥用标记）。

Regardless, the point of marking a post as abusive is to point it out to a moderator. Ultimately, a moderator should make a decision and either remove the message or remove it's abusive marker (or have a special already judged as not abusive marker).

BTW，很可能在另一个上下文 - 我的意思是认真 - 我会把这个帖子标记为辱骂。 Holocost是一个极端的，尽管它很重要，但对于手头的评论来说，它只是
方式，这似乎是不合适的。我觉得你知道这一点并且在你自己职位的讽刺中采取了某种形式的反感。这个想法让我总体质疑：你甚至尊重系统本身的
？

BTW, it is likely that in another context--and i mean this seriously--i would have marked this post as abusive. The Holocost is an extreme, and although it makes a point, it is way out of proportion for the comment at hand, and seems quite inappropriate here. I get the feeling that you knew that and took some form of perverse pleaure in the irony of your own post. This thought makes me question overall: do you even respect the system itself?

这篇关于不值得写的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！